From: Brad Edwards IMIIMIllM>
From: Brad Edwards IMIIMIllM> To: ' Cc: Brittany Henderson ' 0 Subject: Re: Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:16:53 +0000 I am sorry we haven't sent the emails. I thought we had. We will get those to you today. I will call today as well. I am sure she will meet if she is in town. And, yes, it is fine to reach out to her directly. Brad Sent from my iPhone On Dec 11, 2019, at 10:11 AM, Hi Brad and Brittany, > wrote: Our team will be in Los Angeles on Sunday and Monday, and while we're there we would appreciate the chance to meet with if she is available. Would it be okay with you if the agents reached out to her to check on her availability for a short meeting? Belatedly, I think we emailed a while back about some emails and documents you had collected from Ms. Following up on that, we were wondering if you would still be able to provide us with copies of those materials. Thanks, From: Brittany Henderson - Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 12:50 PM To: Cc: Brad Edwards
Summary
From: Brad Edwards IMIIMIllM> To: ' Cc: Brittany Henderson ' 0 Subject: Re: Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:16:53 +0000 I am sorry we haven't sent the emails. I thought we had. We will get those to you today. I will call today as well. I am sure she will meet if she is in town. And, yes, it is fine to reach out to her directly. Brad Sent from my iPhone On Dec 11, 2019, at 10:11 AM, Hi Brad and Brittany, > wrote: Our team will be in Los Angeles on Sunday and Monday, and while we're there we would appreciate the chance to meet with if she is available. Would it be okay with you if the agents reached out to her to check on her availability for a short meeting? Belatedly, I think we emailed a while back about some emails and documents you had collected from Ms. Following up on that, we were wondering if you would still be able to provide us with copies of those materials. Thanks, From: Brittany Henderson - Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 12:50 PM To: Cc: Brad Edwards
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM
Case 09-34791-RBR
Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed
Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed The passage cites a specific non‑prosecution agreement that allegedly prevented a 53‑count federal indictment of Jeffrey Epstein and describes victim‑exclusion tactics. It names dates, a federal prosecutor’s draft indictment, and references to legal filings, offering concrete leads for further FOIA or court‑record requests. While the claim is not novel—Epstein’s NPA has been reported—it provides actionable details (Feb 10 2016 filing, Sept 2007 signing, June 30 2008 termination) that could be pursued to verify the agreement’s terms, the officials who negotiated it, and any potential misconduct by DOJ or the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Key insights: A 53‑count indictment prepared by federal prosecutors was never filed due to an NPA.; Victims were allegedly not consulted about the NPA, violating victim‑rights statutes.; The NPA was signed in September 2007 and remained in effect until June 30, 2008.
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it names well‑known legal figures, it provides no concrete financial transactions, dates, or new factual revelations beyond already public claims, limiting its investigative utility. However, the suggestion that a court record may be sealed to hide potentially damaging testimony offers a moderate lead for further document‑review and freedom‑of‑information requests. Key insights: Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential.; He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaign.; Dershowitz threatens perjury prosecution against accusers and seeks disbarment of opposing counsel.
The Palm Beach Post
EFTA01838551
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.