Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-23 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 6
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-23 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 24 EFTA00081220 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-23 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 2 of 6 Page 1 Page 3 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 1 - - - IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE No.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG 2 EXHIBITS 3 - - - JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff , vs 4 5 NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE 6 Exhibit number 1 Eyeglasses 133 SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. individually, and 7 L.M., individually, 8 9 Defendants. 10 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN 11 Wednesday. March 17. 2010 12 10:17 a.m.- 1:27 p.m. 13 14 303 Banyan Boulevard suite 400 15 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 16 17 Reported By: 18 Sandra W. Townsend, FPR 19 Notary Public, State of Florida 20 West Palm Beach Office Job #1358 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 Page 4 1 APPEARANCES: 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 3 On behalf of the Plaintiff
Summary
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-23 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 24 EFTA00081220 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-23 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 2 of 6 Page 1 Page 3 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 1 - - - IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE No.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG 2 EXHIBITS 3 - - - JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff , vs 4 5 NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE 6 Exhibit number 1 Eyeglasses 133 SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. individually, and 7 L.M., individually, 8 9 Defendants. 10 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN 11 Wednesday. March 17. 2010 12 10:17 a.m.- 1:27 p.m. 13 14 303 Banyan Boulevard suite 400 15 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 16 17 Reported By: 18 Sandra W. Townsend, FPR 19 Notary Public, State of Florida 20 West Palm Beach Office Job #1358 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 Page 4 1 APPEARANCES: 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 3 On behalf of the Plaintiff
Persons Referenced (6)
“...ersonal relationship with 11 Q. Okay. So because those names are in your 12 Donald Trump? 12 Complaint, I'm asking you about the people you named. 13 A. What do you mean by "personal relations...”
Tommy Mottola“...As a reaction to, once again, the abusive 9 Q. Have you ever socialized with Tommy Mottola'. 9 discovery process of bringing in names of people that 10 A. This is the...”
Jack Scarola“...e above cause. 6 6 - - - 7 8 On behalf of the Defendant Bradley Edwards: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE 7 VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on video record. SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA...”
Bradley Edwards“...da at Large, in the above cause. 6 6 - - - 7 8 On behalf of the Defendant Bradley Edwards: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE 7 VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on video record. SEARCY,...”
Alan Dershowitz“...3 THE WITNESS: At least today, the typical to 24 Q. Have you socialized with Alan Dershowitz? 24 the Edwards contention of bringing cases of a 25 A. Yes, sir. He's my attorney, as well as a 25...”
Jeffrey EpsteinTags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (14)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:08-CV-80736-KAM(561) 832-7500(561) 832-75061-280-428-93811-280.428.93811.377-676.28951.377.676.2895324-4437324.4437561.686.6300561.842.282084252521799067145954.524.2820Related Documents (6)
Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse
Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse The passage merely references a prior deposition where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, offering no new names, transactions, or actionable details beyond what is already public. It confirms existing allegations but provides no novel leads for investigation. Key insights: Cites Epstein's deposition on March 17, 2010; Notes Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual preferences; Mentions adverse inference doctrine in civil procedure
Extensive court filing outlines alleged Jeffrey Epstein abuse network, non‑prosecution deal, and potential ties to high‑profile figures (Clinton, T...
The document provides a dense compilation of alleged facts, emails, deposition excerpts, and discovery requests that link Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual‑abuse operation to a “pyramid” recruitment scheme, a Epstein allegedly ran a “pyramid” scheme paying underage victims $200‑$300 per recruited girl. A 2007 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office allegedly shielded Epstein fr Ema
DS9 Document EFTA01100999
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...
The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive
Bradley Edwards' Defense Letter Claims Jeffrey Epstein Filed Frivolous Lawsuit to Extort Attorney and Suppress Victim Testimony
The document outlines a detailed legal argument that Epstein used a civil suit against attorney Bradley Edwards as a tactic to intimidate and silence victims of his sexual abuse. It names high‑profile Epstein sued attorney Bradley Edwards despite no evidence of fraud, allegedly to extort Edwards and The complaint alleges Edwards ‘pumped’ victim cases to investors in a scheme linked to Scott Roths
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.