From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Summary
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: Subject: 20-3061 United States of America v. Maxwell "Sealed Appellant/Petitioner Brief FILED" Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 14:59:47 +0000 ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Notice of Docket Activity The following transaction was entered on 10/05/2020 at 10:59:45 AM EDT and filed on 09/24/2020 Case Name: United States of America v. Maxwell Case Number: 20-3061 Docket Text: SEALED BRIEF, on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, FILED. [2944931] [20-3061] Notice will be electronically mailed to: Ms. T Laura
Persons Referenced (5)
“...mailed to: Ms. T Laura Mennen er, Assistant ttorne Assistant U.S. Attome Adam Mueller - sistant U.S. Attorney: sistant U.S. Attorne : Deputy Clerk: Notice will b...”
U.S. Attorney“...a Mennen er, Assistant ttorne Assistant U.S. Attome Adam Mueller - sistant U.S. Attorney: sistant U.S. Attorne : Deputy Clerk: Notice will be stored in the notice ca...”
Ghislaine MaxwellTags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Pagel of 78
Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Pagel of 78 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit —against— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, PlaintiffiAppellee, Defendant-Appellant, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) APPENDIX Volume IV of VIII (Pages App.-0777 to App.-0852) Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys or e en ant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00076383 Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Paget of 78 Docket Entries App.-0001 Order regarding Ms. Maxwell's Letter Motion to Reconsider July 23, 2020 Ruling, Dated July 29, 2020 (Dkt. 1079) App.-0777 Notice of Appeal, Dated July 29, 2020 (Dkt. 1081) App.-0781 Non-Redacted Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley In Support of Plaintiff's
From: '
From: ' To: <1 Subject: 20-3061 United States of America v. Maxwell "Motion Order FILED granting to seal document" Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:55:09 +0000 ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Notice of Docket Activity The following transaction was filed on 09/28/2020 Case Name: United States of America v. Maxwell Case Number: 20-3061 Document(s): Documental Docket Text: MOTION ORDER, granting motion to seal document [63] filed by Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, FILED. [2940170][68] [20-3061] Notice will be electronically mailed to: T Gee, -: Laura Menninger, Assis
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: Subject: 20-3061 United States of America v. Maxwell "Supplementary Papers FILED to consolidate appeals" Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 19:02:44 +0000 ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Notice of Docket Activity The following transaction was filed on 09/23/2020 Case Name: United States of America v. Maxwell Case Number: 20-3061 Document(s): Document(s) Docket Text: SUPPLEMENTARY PAPERS TO MOTION [17], [38], on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, FILED. Service date 09/23/2020 by CM/ECF.[2937091][54] [20-3
Nos. 20-2413 &
Nos. 20-2413 & 20-3061 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant- Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PlaintificAppellee, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant. On Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York No. 15-CV-7433 (LAP) The Honorable Loretta A. Preska, U.S. District Judge On Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York No. 20-CR-330 (AJN) The Honorable Alison J. Nathan, U.S. District Judge Ghislaine Maxwell's Response to Opposition to Motion to Consolidate EFTA00079364 The government and insist this case and the criminal case are unrelated. But that's not so. The criminal case alleges that Ms. Maxwell committed perjury in the civil case. Two of the six counts are expressly based on the civil case. Moreover, the discovery in the criminal case includes 90,000 pages of material produced by attorneys, all of which comes f
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant
LBUCmaxl
120 LBUCmaxl UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Before: 20 CR 330 (AJN) Jury Trial New York, N.Y. November 30, 2021 8:50 a.m. HON. ALISON J. NATHAN, APPEARANCES DAMIAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorneys HADDON MORGAN AND FOREMAN Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA CHRISTIAN R. EVERDELL LAURA A. MENNINGER -and- BOBBI C. STERNHEIM -and- RENATO STABILE Also Present: District Judge , FBI NYPD Sunny Drescher, Paralegal, U.S. Attorney's Office Ann Lundberg, Paralegal, Haddon Morgan and Foreman SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00068582 121 LBUCmaxl 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Jury not present) THE COURT: Looks like we have everybody. Matt
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.