Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00082692Other

Subject: RE: Victim Letter RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490

Date
Unknown
Source
Reference
EFTA 00082692
Pages
5
Persons
6
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To: ' Cc: ' l.> Subject: RE: Victim Letter RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 19:32:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Thank you both so much for dealing with all this yesterday — I was completely out of the loop on it, dealing with the filing we had due at 5:00, so just catching up now — really really appreciate it. Thanks again. From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 17:21 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Victim Letter RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Just to let you know. The letter was printed brought to the Post Office. Anyone that had an email in the system received the letter immediately. I tried to call all the victims I left a message with my name and email address. I spoke to 5 out of the 15. I also called attorney's office listed and left my number. The addresses of the law firms are just that not identifying the attorney. I called and spoke to Singred McCawley from Boies Schiller and Flexner who rep

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: ' Cc: ' l.> Subject: RE: Victim Letter RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 19:32:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Thank you both so much for dealing with all this yesterday — I was completely out of the loop on it, dealing with the filing we had due at 5:00, so just catching up now — really really appreciate it. Thanks again. From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 17:21 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Victim Letter RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Just to let you know. The letter was printed brought to the Post Office. Anyone that had an email in the system received the letter immediately. I tried to call all the victims I left a message with my name and email address. I spoke to 5 out of the 15. I also called attorney's office listed and left my number. The addresses of the law firms are just that not identifying the attorney. I called and spoke to Singred McCawley from Boies Schiller and Flexner who represents several victims. I asked her to send me an email with the names of all the victims so that we can put all of them into the database correctly. She is aware of the hearing and will be attending. She gave me the name of another attorney Brad Edwards Esq. that represent several victims she was going make sure he emailed me too. I left Mr. Edwards a message. So we are making progress on the list. From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 3:29 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Victim Letter RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 >; Thanks =. Attached is the final notification for the victims should you need it. EFTA00082692 From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 3:24 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Victim Letter RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 You can press send. From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 3:21 PM To: Cc: >; Subject: RE: Victim Letter RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Thanks . Can I press send? From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 3:11 PM To: Cc: >; Subject: RE: Victim Letter RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 This looks fine to me. From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 2:34 PM To: Cc: >; Subject: RE: Victim Letter RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Hi everyone, please see attached the updated draft of the notification that will be sent to the victims in this case. Let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, Victim-Witness Assistant United States Attorney's Office — SDNY 1 St. Andrews Plaza New York, NY 10007 Phone: >; EFTA00082693 From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 2:17 PM To: Cc: >; Subject: Re: Victim Letter RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Looping in Sent from my iPhone On Jul 12, 2019, at 2:13 PM, — please wait for her to sign off before sending. wrote: >; Please do the corrections that I= sent to you and circulate a final draft to all. I have been calling all the victims and telling them about the hearing on Monday. I am also getting email addresses. We are good. From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 2:05 PM To: Cc: >; a>; ;1 Subject: RE: Victim Letter RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Forgot: please add telno From: S (USANYS) Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 2:03 PM To: Cc: >; Subject: Victim Letter RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Here are my proposed edits. Speak now so we can get it out quickly. From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 1:48 PM To: EFTA00082694 Cc: Subject: RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Presumably for folks on this list who have attorneys, we can email the letter to the lawyer? For people who don't, would it make sense to contact them by phone to see if we can get an email address? Or blast the letter out by text message if that is feasible? From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 1:37 PM To: >• >; Cc: Subject: FW: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Hopefully we will get more email addresses. From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 1:29 PM To: Subject: RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 We have only one email address for one of the victims. The rest of them will receive a letter. If the agents have an email address they can send it to us and we'll enter in VNS. From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 1:26 PM To: Cc: El==a Subject: RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Whatever you want. If we have emails we send it by email. From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 1:23 PM To: Subject: RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Do you send this by email, hard copy, or both? From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 1:16 PM To: >; Cc: Subject: RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 EFTA00082695 From: Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 1:08 PM To: Cc Subject: RE: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Importance: High Hey following up on this, wanted to get everybody on one email and to make sure we're getting notifications out before the events, so two questions — /M, just wanted to triple-check, does FBI know that we're sending out this notification? It is Post indictment under the AG Guidelines We are responsible for sending out ALL notification. And did you have language tweaks you wanted to provide (particularly on the plea language)? I don't think you can tweak anything on the standard letter. This letter is mandated by EOUSA. The language is what all victims are sent coming from the DO1 from every USAO. We would need special permission to change language. I think we *have* to get this out today since it's about the hearing on Monday, and in the future will want to be well in advance (that's on us for this one, I should say, not or thanks, From: Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 13:18 To: Cc: Subject: US v. Jeffrey Epstein / 2018R01618 / Docket: 19-CR-00490 Hi Attached is a charges filed and status hearing notification for this defendant. Did you want to add any additional information or can it go out? Also attached is the list of victims we have in VNS that will receive this notification and future ones. Thank you, Victim-Witness Assistant U.S. Attorney's Office — SONY 1 St. Andrews Plaza New York, NY 10007 Office: EFTA00082696

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214 Entered on F LSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION Case No. 08-CIV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS WITH INTEGRATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to a Joint Stipulation Regarding Certain Documentation files this his Motion for Protective Order and Objection to Disclosure of Certain Correspondence and Discovery for the reasons set forth below: I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT During the underlying litigation, Epstein vigorously sought protection from the Court that these and other documents produced would be used for purposes other than those contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for discovery; i.e., dissemination in the

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CM/ECF - Live Database

CM/ECF - Live Database r Page 1 of 3 U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80736-KA M Doe'. United States of America Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Cause: no cause specified Date Filed: 07/07/2008 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant LRJ Date Filed # Docket Text 07/07/2008 1 EMERGENCY PETITION for Victim's Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act 18 USC 3771 against United States of America Filing fee $ 350. Receipt#: 724403, filed by Jane Doe. (rb) (Entered: 07/07/2008) 07/07/2008 2 CERTIFICATE OF EMERGENCY by Jane Doe re 1 Complaint (rb) (Entered: 07/07/2008) 07/07/2008 3 ORDER requiring U.S. Attorney to respond to 1 Complaint filed by Jane Doe by 5:00 p.m. on 7/9/08. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 7/7/08. (ir) (Entered: 07/07/2008) 07/09/2008 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Dexter Lee on behalf of United States of America (

204p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO VICTIMS' MOTION TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Respondent, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement, and states: I. THE MOTION TO UNSEAL SHOULD BE DENIED BECAUSE THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT HAS NEVER BEEN FILED UNDER SEAL IN THIS COURT. Petitioners have filed their motion to unseal the non-prosecution agreement, claiming that no good cause exists for sealing it. As an initial matter, the motion should be denied because the non-prosecution agreement entered into between the United States Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein was never filed in the instant case by the United States, either under seal or otherwise. On August 14, 2008, this Court held a telephonic hearing to discuss petitioners' r

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, I UNITED STATES Respondent. RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Motion to Dismiss, pursuant to Rules 12(6)(6) and 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and states: I. LITIGATION HISTORY On July 7, 2008, plaintiff Jane Doe filed her "Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771." (D.E. I). On the same day, this Court issued an Order directing the United States Attorney to file a response to the petition by 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, July 9, 2008. (D.E. 3). On July 9, 2008, the United States Attorney filed the "Government's Response to Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771." (D.E. 7). The Court held a hearing on July 11, 2008. On August 18, 2008, the Court held a

7p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.