Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00083877DOJ Data Set 9Other

aNIMIW

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00083877
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: aNIMIW To: air <a „- Cc: e, •S" Subject: FW: obstruction to justice in the U.S. v. Epstein case Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:35:37 +0000 See below. Defer you to you all on how to handle. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York NY 10007 Original Messa e From: (USANYS) Sent: Monday. July 29, 2019 I :34 PM To: Subject: FW: obstruction to justice in the U.S. v. Epstein case Original Message Fro Sent: Monda , July 29, 2019 1:01 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: obstruction to justice in the U.S. v. Epstein case Dear Ms Olsen, MUM my name i live in Berlin, Germany. I am writing with reference to the U.S. v. Epstein case or, more precise y, o e pa of it which refers to the relationship of the accused with Deutsche Bank AG. The notorious Germany-based "financial institution" is the one that faces a criminal money-laundering probe in the U.S. It also played a key role in Jeffrey Epstein's dirty business by h

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: aNIMIW To: air <a „- Cc: e, •S" Subject: FW: obstruction to justice in the U.S. v. Epstein case Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:35:37 +0000 See below. Defer you to you all on how to handle. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York NY 10007 Original Messa e From: (USANYS) Sent: Monday. July 29, 2019 I :34 PM To: Subject: FW: obstruction to justice in the U.S. v. Epstein case Original Message Fro Sent: Monda , July 29, 2019 1:01 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: obstruction to justice in the U.S. v. Epstein case Dear Ms Olsen, MUM my name i live in Berlin, Germany. I am writing with reference to the U.S. v. Epstein case or, more precise y, o e pa of it which refers to the relationship of the accused with Deutsche Bank AG. The notorious Germany-based "financial institution" is the one that faces a criminal money-laundering probe in the U.S. It also played a key role in Jeffrey Epstein's dirty business by helping him move his dirty money out of the USA. But what is even more outrageous is the fact that the top-level German government authorities (including Mr EFTA00083877 Scholz, the Finance Minister) keep on stubbornly supporting this criminal "financial institution" at the expense of law-abiding taxpayers, obviously considering it "too big to fail." Moreover, even the German "law-enforcement" authorities cover up DB's criminal activities. Thus, when I contacted the German Federal Criminal Police (Bundeskriminalamt) with request to give me an opportunity to submit evidence related to the DB case, they totally ignored my request. When I insisted, they replied with a blatant lie that they are not involved in the investigation. Then, I quoted multiple reports in the media stating that Bundeskriminalamt is in charge of this investigation and asked to either admit that their previous statement was wrong and give me an opportunity to submit the evidence I have documented or, in case the media reports of them being in charge of the investigation are "fake news," to pass on my request to the relevant authorities. The only response I have received is deafening silence. Therefore, I would like to know if you might be able and willing to help me submit the evidence related to the Epstein — Deutsche Bank relations directly to the law-enforcement authorities in charge of Epstein's case in the USA? Sincerely, EFTA00083878

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN RE:

IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Non-Prosecution Agreement IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein with one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure expressed in this Agreement; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation of Epstein's background and offenses including; knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to commit an offense against the United States, in violation of Titl

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Jeffrey Epstein

From: To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 20:51:45 +0000 Importance: Normal Mr. Lefkowitz, The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida was recently notified that the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, at your request, intends to review certain aspects of the investigation involving Mr. Epstein's sexual conduct involving minor victims. Naturally, until the DAG's Office has completed its review, this Office has postponed the current June 2, 2008 deadline requiring compliance by your client with the terms and conditions of the September 24, 2007 global resolution of state and federal liabilities, as modified by the United States Attorney's December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Sincerely, EFTA00214435

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

11/28/07 WED 09:18 FAX 1 213 680 8500

11/28/07 WED 09:18 FAX 1 213 680 8500 KIRALAND&ELLIS LLP 11002 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND A/MIMED PARINUSHIPS Kenneth W: Start To Call Wrier Directly. (213) 680-8440 kstarrekirklend.com VIA FACSIMILE Honorable Alice S. Fisher Assistant Attorney General Department of Justice Criminal Division 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Room 2107 Washington, DC 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Fisher: 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 680-8400 www.kirkland.com November 28, 2007 Facsimile: (213) 680-8600 I represent Jeffrey Epstein, who, as you may be aware, was the target of a dual investigation by both state and federal authorities in Florida for acts relating to his interactions with numerous young women. As you may also be aware, Mr. Epstein has entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the "Agreement") with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (the "USAO") to resolve its criminal investigation of him

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EXHIBIT M

EXHIBIT M EFTA00039806 From: U Subject: Date: Fwd: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Sunday. February 24, 2019 8:18:01 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Dat • March 3 ?016 at 5:09.55 PM EST To: Subject: RE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Cool. Talk to you then. From: Sent: I hursday, March 03, 20th 5:05 PM To:I 2 Subject: HE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Tuesday at 4 is good. Thanks. From: Sent: hursday, March 03, 2011 10:24 AM To: Subject: HE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Sure. Sounds both intriguing and complicated. I uesday is better for me than Wednesday. How's Tuesday at 4 pm? From: Sent: I hursday. March 03, 201b k:08 AM To: ■ Subject: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Earlier this week Pete Skinner and two other lawyers came in to pitch a sex trafficking case against Jeffrey Epstein, a financier with homes abroad, in FL, and in Manhattan. They represent vho claims to have been prostituted by and f

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.