Confidential
Confidential Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x Plaintiff, -against- GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS **CONFIDENTIAL** x Continued Videotaped Deposition of GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the Defendant herein, taken pursuant to subpoena, was held at the law offices of Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, 575 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York, commencing July 22, 2016, 9:04 a.m., on the above date, before Leslie Fagin, a Court Reporter and Notary Public in the State of New York. MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES 1200 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10026 (866) 624-6221 MAG NA 0 LEGAL SERVICES EFTA00083933 Confidential Page 2 1 2 APPEARANCES: 3 On Behalf of the Plaintiff: 4 BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 333 Main Street 5 Armonk, New York 10504 BY: DAVID BOIES, ESQUIRE 6 7 8 BY: BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER,LLP Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 MEREDITH SCHULTZ, ESQUIRE SIGRID McCAWLEY, ESQUIRE 9 SANDRA PER
Summary
Confidential Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x Plaintiff, -against- GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS **CONFIDENTIAL** x Continued Videotaped Deposition of GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the Defendant herein, taken pursuant to subpoena, was held at the law offices of Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, 575 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York, commencing July 22, 2016, 9:04 a.m., on the above date, before Leslie Fagin, a Court Reporter and Notary Public in the State of New York. MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES 1200 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10026 (866) 624-6221 MAG NA 0 LEGAL SERVICES EFTA00083933 Confidential Page 2 1 2 APPEARANCES: 3 On Behalf of the Plaintiff: 4 BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 333 Main Street 5 Armonk, New York 10504 BY: DAVID BOIES, ESQUIRE 6 7 8 BY: BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER,LLP Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 MEREDITH SCHULTZ, ESQUIRE SIGRID McCAWLEY, ESQUIRE 9 SANDRA PER
Persons Referenced (10)
“...Lake City, Utah, also representing 9 10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Jeff Pagliuca and 11 Laura Menninger, on behalf of Ms. 12 Maxwell. 13 And Ms. McCawley has also entered 14 the...”
JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA“...N MORGAN FOREMAN 21 Attorneys for Defendant 22 Denver, Colorado 80203 BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQUIRE 23 LAURA A. MENNIGER, ESQUIRE 24 Also Present: 25 MAGNAO LEGAL...”
Haddon Morgan Foreman“...York 10590 18 BY: STAN POTTINGER, ESQUIRE 19 On Behalf of Defendant: 20 HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN 21 Attorneys for Defendant 22 Denver, Colorado 80203 BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLI...”
Sigrid McCawleyStanley Pottinger“...EDWARDS, ESQUIRE 13 14 PAUL G. CASSELL ES UIRE 15 at ace ity, to 16 J. STANLEY POTTINGER PLLC 17 South Salem, New York 10590 18 BY: STAN POTTINGER, ESQUIRE 19 On...”
Ghislaine MaxwellBradley EdwardsDavid BoiesPaul Cassell“...OTTINGER: Stan Pottinger, 6 also representing the plaintiff. 7 MR. CASSELL: Paul Cassell, from 8 Salt Lake City, Utah, also representing 9 10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Jeff Pa...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...uestions relating to defendant's 9 own sexual activity with or involving 10 Jeffrey Epstein, with or involving 11 plaintiff, with or involving underage 12 females, inv...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
(866) 624-6221Related Documents (6)
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell’s Motion cites alleged meetings with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Dershowitz and foreign leaders as admissible evidence
The filing references specific alleged contacts between Maxwell and high‑profile figures (Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and unnamed foreign presidents) that could link powerful actors Motion in Limine 2 asserts Maxwell met Bill Clinton twice on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island. Motion in Limine 1 references stories involving Alan Dershowitz, foreign presidents and world leader Mot
Defendant’s Opposition cites alleged meetings with Bill Clinton on Jeffrey Epstein’s island and references to Dershowitz, foreign presidents, and P...
The filing lists specific alleged contacts between Ghislaine Maxwell and high‑profile figures (Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, foreign heads of state). If substantiated, these connection Motion 2 alleges Maxwell met Bill Clinton twice on Epstein’s private island. Motion 1 references stories involving Alan Dershowitz and foreign presidents. Motion 5 addresses Prince Andrew and Bucking
Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads
Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads The filing reveals a court‑ordered request for Epstein’s sealed phone records, contact list, and message pad excerpts, which could contain undisclosed connections to powerful individuals. While the case is already public, the specific documents sought are not, offering a concrete investigative avenue. The lead is moderately controversial and potentially high‑impact if the records expose further elite networks, but it does not yet name top‑level officials directly. Key insights: Plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor] seeks a court order compelling Jeffrey Epstein to produce phone records, a contact list, and message pad excerpts.; The documents are filed as sealed exhibits, indicating they may contain undisclosed information.; Exhibit 4 references Ghislaine (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), suggesting her involvement in the communications.
Court filings reveal alleged links between Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network and high‑profile figures including Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz
Court filings reveal alleged links between Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network and high‑profile figures including Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz The documents contain multiple sworn statements, media excerpts, and court orders that reference alleged sexual encounters between [REDACTED - Survivor] (Jane Doe 3) and Prince Andrew, as well as accusations against Alan Dershowitz. While many of the claims have been publicly reported, the filing includes sealed exhibits and specific procedural motions (Rule 21/15) that could provide new evidentiary leads, such as the referenced sealed documents and the alleged list of other powerful individuals (politicians, business executives, foreign leaders). The presence of a judge’s order striking certain allegations and the detailed procedural history suggest actionable avenues for further discovery and verification. Key insights: Exhibits list media articles linking Prince Andrew and Dershowitz to alleged sexual abuse of a minor.; Court order strikes detailed allegations but preserves the right of Jane Doe 3 to reassert them with proper evidence.; Reference to a “list of numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well‑known Prime Minister, and other world leaders” in the Rule 21 motion.
Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Pagel of 78
Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Pagel of 78 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit —against— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, PlaintiffiAppellee, Defendant-Appellant, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) APPENDIX Volume IV of VIII (Pages App.-0777 to App.-0852) Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys or e en ant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00076383 Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Paget of 78 Docket Entries App.-0001 Order regarding Ms. Maxwell's Letter Motion to Reconsider July 23, 2020 Ruling, Dated July 29, 2020 (Dkt. 1079) App.-0777 Notice of Appeal, Dated July 29, 2020 (Dkt. 1081) App.-0781 Non-Redacted Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley In Support of Plaintiff's
Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Omnibus Motion in Limine – Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell (SDNY)
Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Omnibus Motion in Limine – Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell (SDNY) The document is merely a filing header with attorney contact information and case caption. It contains no substantive allegations, names beyond the parties, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. Consequently, it offers no investigative value, controversy, novelty, or power linkage. Key insights: Case involves Virginia L. Giuffre suing Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York.; Filing is a response to an omnibus motion in limine.; Counsel listed: Laura A. Menninger, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Ty Gee of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.