Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00083961DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "-

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00083961
Pages
5
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: "- To: 'Marty Weinberg' <1 Cc: tt , " 'Marc Fernich' Subject: RE: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:45:52 +0000 Importance: Normal Embedded: Undeliverable:_Epstein_Arrest_Seizure_Items.msg; Undeliverable:_Epstein_Arrest_Seizure_Items(1).msg I received bounce-back messages for two att.net emails in response to the below (attached), so just want to make sure, Marty, that you were able to receive the email at your firm email address. Thanks. From: Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 11:42 To: 'Martin G. Weinberg' < >; 'Marc Fernich' <a> Cc: 'Marty Weinberg' c a>, Subject: RE: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items Hi Marty, In reverse order, we're not prepared to make any generalized representations regarding any communications within the Department in its entirety, but I note for your reference that the Southern District of Florida apparently recused itself in or about March 2019, and it was only at that point, to my knowledge, that the Northern District of

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "- To: 'Marty Weinberg' <1 Cc: tt , " 'Marc Fernich' Subject: RE: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:45:52 +0000 Importance: Normal Embedded: Undeliverable:_Epstein_Arrest_Seizure_Items.msg; Undeliverable:_Epstein_Arrest_Seizure_Items(1).msg I received bounce-back messages for two att.net emails in response to the below (attached), so just want to make sure, Marty, that you were able to receive the email at your firm email address. Thanks. From: Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 11:42 To: 'Martin G. Weinberg' < >; 'Marc Fernich' <a> Cc: 'Marty Weinberg' c a>, Subject: RE: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items Hi Marty, In reverse order, we're not prepared to make any generalized representations regarding any communications within the Department in its entirety, but I note for your reference that the Southern District of Florida apparently recused itself in or about March 2019, and it was only at that point, to my knowledge, that the Northern District of Georgia became involved in the CVRA case. As we have noted, our investigation had been active for several months at that time. And we will further discuss your other communications-related questions and get back to you. Regarding the review of electronic devices, we'll discuss internally whether we're in a position to specifically describe our review and screening process, but certainly it would be helpful in the first instance for you to provide the list of attorneys and/or firms that could implicate privilege. You can simply send that list to us—unless you have concerns that even the identities of those attorneys and firms would disclose privileged information, though I think ideally the case team would benefit from having that information as further protection against any taint. thanks, From: Martin G. Weinberg < Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 08:31 To: >; 'Marc Fernich' a> 'Martin Weinberg' < MI> Cc: 'Marty Weinberg' < Subject: RE: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items Good morning The purpose of this email is to address two issues separate from the ongoing bail/detention hearings. EFTA00083961 First, the seizure of various phones and computer-type devices from Mr Epstein and his residence. I would like to discuss the protocol for any search of the devices with the purpose of protecting the confidentiality of a vast amount of attorney- client and work product privileged communications that are within these devices. Can we schedule a call? I have assembled a preliminary list of attorneys. If the matter has been delegated to a taint prosecutor, and without waiving rights to contest the process, I would like to send the list of attorneys to that taint prosecutor. Second, yesterday stated that there had been no communications with the SD Fla. That is not surprising since they are recused. Would you inform the defense whether there has been a similar absence of any contact with the ND Ga prosecutors (in particular br with Main Justice (eg CEOS or others)? I would also want to explore with you an agreement on preserving emaiis, texts, voicemessages, documents that would be relevant to the genesis of the SDNY investigation given the issues that we have raised regarding the NPA. I am not by this email seeking their discovery (a future issue), only an agreement on their preservation. Thanks Marty Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. From: Sent: Monday, July 15, 2019 8:35 PM To: Marc Fernich Cc: Marty Weinberg < ) Subject: RE: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items Marc, Martin Weinberg >; Circling back on this, I'll ask the agents to bring the cash and other personal effects seized from Mr. Epstein to the hearing on Thursday, unless it is important to receive them before then, in which case please let me know and I'll try to arrange that. With respect to the electronic devices, we've obtained a warrant to search them and so will be retaining them as evidence. thanks, From: Marc Fernich < Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 15:54 To: Cc: Marty Weinberg < Martin Weinberg >; Subject: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items Hi M . Sorry to bug you while you may be working on a bail reply. I'm having trouble reaching Agent to coordinate pickup of the cellphone and other items seized upon Epstein's arrest. She said she'd be out in the field, but I don't hear from the intermediary agent — identity unknown — who was EFTA00083962 supposed to handle it in her absence. Can you step in and try to move this along? Thanks a lot. Marc Fernich, Esq. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 9, 2019, at 3:26 PM, > wrote: Marc, It is the right number, so feel free to follow up later, but I can also give you her cell number which is thanks, From: Marc Fernich <-> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2019 14:56 To: Cc: Marty Weinberg < ; Martin Weinberg < >; Subject: Re: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB), Government bail memorandum Sorry to trouble again. No answer or VM pickup at that number. I'll try again later so long as it's the right number. Can you confirm? Many thanks. Marc Fernich, Esq. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 9, 2019, at 2:45 PM, Marc, ) < > wrote: EFTA00083963 Apologies for the delay on this, and thanks for following up. The best way to coordinate this is to contact the case agent directly — I just spoke to her so she'll be expecting your call. They're running around, so if you reach out and aren't able to connect today please let me know, but hopefully we can get it coordinated. The contact is Special Agent and she can be reached at thanks, From: Marc Fernich < > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2019 15:40 To: Subject: Re: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB), Government bail memorandum One of your agents told Marty the case agent would return Epstein's phone, the cash and other items taken from his person upon arrest. Marty's returning to Boston shortly. Can you arrange for me to take possession of those items? Thanks, Marc Marc Fernich, Esq. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 8, 2019, at 10:53 AM, wrote: Marc, Wanted to send this to you as well in case your co-counsel can't receive it in the Court. Please let me know if it would be helpful to get a hard copy — I'm copying two of our paralegals who can bring you (or co-counsel) a copy; I'll be unreachable for the next hour or so. thank you, From: Sent: Monday, July 08, 2019 10:43 To: Cc: 'Martin Weinberg' < >.; EFTA00083964 Subject: RE: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB), Government bail memorandum To the Chambers of Judge Pitman: In advance of the expected bail argument in the above-captioned case, in connection with the presentment and arraignment referred by Judge Berman, attached please find a memorandum from the government on the issue of detention. Defense counsel is copied, as is the chambers of Judge Berman at their request. Thank you, Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York <U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB), Government bail memorandum.pdf> EFTA00083965

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01687991

76p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 1 of 14 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 12, 2019 VIA ECF The Honorable Richard M. Berman United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Judge Berman: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the defendant's Motion for Pretrial Release (the "Release Motion"), dated July 11, 2019 (Dkt. 6), and in further support of its Memorandum in Support of Detention (the "Detention Memo"), submitted to Magistrate Judge Pitman on July 8, 2019, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein (Ex. A). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The defendant is a serial sexual predator who is charged with abusing underage girls for years. A grand jury has ret

28p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00016136

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-Civ-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER COME NOW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to file this response in opposition to Epstein's Motion for a Protective Confidentiality Order (DE 247). Epstein's motion is a thinly-disguised attempt to relitigate issues already covered by the court's earlier ruling eleven months ago (DE 188), which allowed the victims to file correspondence relating to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement in the public court file. Rather than reverse its previous ruling, this Court should reaffirm it — and allow the important issues presented by this case to be litigated in the light of day. BACKGROUND Because of Epstein's penchant for relitigating issues that have already been decided, it

20p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 1 of 14 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 12, 2019 VIA ECF The Honorable Richard M. Berman United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Judge Berman: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the defendant's Motion for Pretrial Release (the "Release Motion"), dated July 11, 2019 (Dkt. 6), and in further support of its Memorandum in Support of Detention (the "Detention Memo"), submitted to Magistrate Judge Pitman on July 8, 2019, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein (Ex. A). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The defendant is a serial sexual predator who is charged with abusing underage girls for years. A grand jury has ret

28p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv 80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv 80119-KAM Document 180 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 Page 1 of 51 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 16 2Y) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION CASE NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. x APPEARANCES: WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 12, 2009 TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE KENNETH A. MARRA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: For Jane Doe TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION EFTA00212053 Case 9:08-cv 80119-KAM Document 180 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 Page 2 of 51 2 I I I I I 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 FOR THE DEFENDANT: REPORTED BY: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. MICHAEL BURMAN, ESQ. Burman Critton, etc. 515 North Flagler Street West Palm Beach, FL 33401 JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. Atterbury Goldberger Weiss 250 Australian Avenue Sou

51p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.