Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00084116DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: RE: Request re Ghisliane Maxwell

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00084116
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: Request re Ghisliane Maxwell Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 17:01:41 +0000 Np!! >» ' PM >>> Thanks very much and sorry I missed your response. Original Message From: Sent: Fn ay,January , : 101.1111 11M u ject: : equest is laneMaxwell /8/2021 12:00 I responded earlier today. No, unfortunately not. It would have to come from your office. >>>' AM > Good morning, 1/8/2021 11:58 Following up on this email, would it be acceptable for someone from the defense to deliver this new drive from our office to the MDC today, please? ssts an ni a staates Attorney Southern District of New York I St. Andrew's Plaza New York NY 10007 Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 4:35 PM u jec : eques re is lane axwe EFTA00084116 Good afternoon, At the request of defense counsel, our office is preparing a new drive with a copy of discovery material that was previously produced to Ghislaine Maxwell on a CD, but which she has been unable to view. The drive wil

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: Request re Ghisliane Maxwell Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 17:01:41 +0000 Np!! >» ' PM >>> Thanks very much and sorry I missed your response. Original Message From: Sent: Fn ay,January , : 101.1111 11M u ject: : equest is laneMaxwell /8/2021 12:00 I responded earlier today. No, unfortunately not. It would have to come from your office. >>>' AM > Good morning, 1/8/2021 11:58 Following up on this email, would it be acceptable for someone from the defense to deliver this new drive from our office to the MDC today, please? ssts an ni a staates Attorney Southern District of New York I St. Andrew's Plaza New York NY 10007 Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 4:35 PM u jec : eques re is lane axwe EFTA00084116 Good afternoon, At the request of defense counsel, our office is preparing a new drive with a copy of discovery material that was previously produced to Ghislaine Maxwell on a CD, but which she has been unable to view. The drive will be ready tomorrow. Today, defense counsel asked that Maxwell be able to review those materials over this coming weekend, but no one from ow office is available to hand deliver the drive tomorrow, and we understand that Maxwell would not receive a FedEx package sent out tomorrow until next week. Defense counsel has offered to pick the drive up from our office and hand deliver it to the MDC themselves tomorrow. Would that be permissible? Tha li a sms ru tes Attorney Southern District of New York I St. Andrew's Plaza EFTA00084117

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 650

The United States Attorney's office requests that the court exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act from April 1, 2022, to April 22, 2022, due to pending post-trial motions in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense counsel consents to this request. The court had previously excluded time through April 1, 2022, to allow the parties to research and brief post-trial motions.

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject:

From: To: Subject: - u is airs ews ne Ing e nes ay, u y 29, 2020 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:25:50 +0000 c Importan e: Normal Mobile version and searchable archives available at fbi.bulletinintelligence.com. 1B1 News Briefing TO: THE DIRECTOR AND SENIOR STAFF DATE: WEDNESDAY, JULY 29, 2020 6:30 AM EDT TODAY'S TABLE OF CONTENTS LEADING THE NEWS • Barr Spars With Democrats At Contentious House Hearing. • Barr Says Democrats Have Tried To "Discredit" Him. • Barr Says Bash Investigating "High Number Of Unmaskings" During Obama Administration. PROTESTS • Memo Reveals Federal Agents Sought Role In Suppressing Protests Since Start. • New Mexico Governor Addresses Concerns About Federal Agents In Albuquerque. • Report: US, Oregon In Talks About Pulling Agents From Portland. • Portland Fines Federal Government For Unpermitted Fence Outside Courthouse. • US Park Police Head: Decision To Clear Protesters Not Linked To Trump "Photo Op." • Hundreds Of Cases Involving LAPD Off

47p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 214 Filed 04/19/21 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 4/19/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: An arraignment on the S2 Superseding Indictment is scheduled to take place on April 23, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. The proceeding will take place in Courtroom 24B of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY. Given significant public interest, a video feed of the proceeding will be available for viewing in the Jury Assembly Room and Courtroom 9C at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse. The use of any electronic devices during the proceeding in either the Courtroom or the overflow rooms is strictly prohibited. Due to social distancing requirements, seating will be limited to approximately 100 members of the public. If capacity is reached, no ad

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Motto Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 28, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter with respect to the protective order to be entered in the above-captioned case, and to respond to the defendant's letter and submission of July 27, 2020 (the "Defendant Letter" or "Def. Ltr.") (Dkt. 29). The Government and defense counsel have conferred regarding a protective order several times via telephone and email between July 9, 2020, and today, including as recently as this morning. The Government and defense counsel have come to an agreement on much of the proposed protective order. However, the parties

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.