Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00084175Other

To: ''

Date
Unknown
Source
Reference
EFTA 00084175
Pages
4
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To: '' , Cc: r (USANYS)" ctl Subject: RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 23:12:26 +0000 1=, Thanks very much, and this generally looks fine to me. Might it be possible to add the following before the "Please contact me" sentence: And the materials that emailed at 3:06 this afternoon all look good to me, so everything should be ready to go once the letter is approved. If you wouldn't mind letting us know when you send everything out, that would be great. thanks again, From: (USANYS) Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 00:07 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Thanks for adding Mon this for the redactions, M. Please find attached the letter to go out with the docs. (Note that my supervisor is still looking at it.) Please let me know if you ha

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: '' , Cc: r (USANYS)" ctl Subject: RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 23:12:26 +0000 1=, Thanks very much, and this generally looks fine to me. Might it be possible to add the following before the "Please contact me" sentence: And the materials that emailed at 3:06 this afternoon all look good to me, so everything should be ready to go once the letter is approved. If you wouldn't mind letting us know when you send everything out, that would be great. thanks again, From: (USANYS) Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 00:07 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Thanks for adding Mon this for the redactions, M. Please find attached the letter to go out with the docs. (Note that my supervisor is still looking at it.) Please let me know if you have any edits or concerns. I think last time we ran everything past before it went out to the door. I planned to do that again, once the packet is ready to go. Thanks. From: Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 6:14 PM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] Cc: (USANYS) Subject: FW: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF We have a redaction project we need help with, please — could you please take a look at the attachments included in the attached email? As described a couple emails below, they consist mostly of FedEx invoices, plus another few docs, that EFTA00084175 need to be redacted for production based on a Touhy request. Would you be able to help out with that? If you could please send the redacted versions to us and to (copied here), we'll do a final review for production and then be all set. thanks, From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 00:50 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-J6K-DCF Thanks, MI. I should be able to turn a letter on this quickly. I think if it would be easy to have a paralegal do the redactions, that would be helpful and probably speed things up (it doesn't matter which side that happens on). Let me know if that would work, or I can also ask a paralegal on my side. Thanks, From: Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 9:38 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-J6K-DCF )< I> This is obviously now very belated, but as previewed earlier today, I've completed a review of our materials for documents responsive to this Touhy request. Unfortunately, and as discussed, many of the documents we have that would be otherwise responsive were obtained pursuant to grand jury subpoenas we issued. Based on your discussion with am not conveying those materials to you for review. What we're left with are the following, which are attached: 4 documents relating to FedEx invoices, obtained from the FOIA office in connection with its review of the Florida investigation file (note that there are actually 12 such documents in all, but the remainder are duplicative; please let us know if we should produce all 12 anyway, otherwise I've just given you the 4); 2 documents obtained through electronic search warrants; and 1 document, a photo, obtained through a physical search of Epstein's residence. EFTA00084176 Given the small volume, if we can get it out quickly that would be fantastic, and please let us know if it would be helpful to have a paralegal do the redactions (not sure if you have to do that on your side, or if we can assist). Please let us know if any questions at all, and thanks as always. From: (USANYS) Sent: Monday, June 08, 2020 23:51 To: I < >; Subject: FW: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Importance: High Hi all, Will you be able to gather the responsive documents for Glassman's request, as with the request from Kaplan? Except for Item 8, this request seems fairly contained—and they have expressly cabined their request to not seek documents that would interfere with ongoing proceedings. Please let me know if we need to discuss. Otherwise, I'll draft a letter once we have the docs gathered (happy to do redactions again if helpful). Thanks, From: Robert Glassman < Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 3:08 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: < >; Nathan Werksman Keilah Betts <i )' Subject: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20- cv-00484-JGK-DCF Importance: High Dear Mr. Please see the attached letter of today's date. A copy will also be sent via Fedex. Thank you. Robert Glassman Robert Glassman, Esq. Panish Shea 8, Boyle LLP 11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Web: www.psblaw.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution EFTA00084177 or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail or telephone, and delete all copies of this message. If you are a potential client, the information you disclose to us by email will be kept in strict confidence and will be protected to the full extent of the law. Please be advised, however, that Panish Shea & Boyle LLP and its lawyers do not represent you until you have signed a retainer agreement with the firm. Until that time, you are responsible for any statutes of limitations or other deadlines for your case or potential case. EFTA00084178

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01369996

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.