From: '

From: ' )" fr". To: ' le "- Cc: "I „cl - - a, '1 Subject: FW: SDNY investigation, Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2020 04:29:51 +0000 Attachments: Attomey_Proffer 1-3-20.pdf Inlinc-Images: image001.jpg - following up on the discussions with attorney a couple weeks ago, we got this attorney proffer this evening. In addition to being remarkably thorough, it's pretty interesting; she was in the thick of things in the period that we primarily investigated and much of her account provides additional confirmation of what we already know, but there are also a few relevant additions. A couple things I thought looked especially relevant: I think we'd want to hear from her about Epstein telling her "that Maxwell was the 'original girl finder' (and on the legal side we'd want to figure out if we could get into evidence in any prosecution against Maxwell). It might be useful in connection withMto see what made believe was likely a victim. Unfortunately I think we would want to see if she remembers the names of other girls Epstein induced her to have sexual contact with, particularly to the extent that corroborates the accounts of others (and even if it's not directly related to Maxwell). It's very interesting that she says Epstein asked her to be with multiple friends of his — I believe (?) this is the first person other than IN who has had that account. She wasn't close to being underage, but I think we'd still very much want to know who those friends were, in case they were also being visited by underage victims, and/or whether that caused Epstein to have any influence over them, etc. Anybody else have initial thoughts? I think ideally we could interview her during an existing trip to California, and/or follow up with her attorney on some of these initial questions in the first instance. From: Jeffrey Pop ‹ > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2020 18:35 To: Cc: Subject: RE: SDNY investigation, Dear Attached, in letter format, please find a version of an Attorney Proffer regarding involvement with Epstein. At the end, I have also included an outline of how he operated. and her current perception as to The foregoing is a culmination of a series of interviews with my client and I believe that it represents her potential testimony. Obviously, I am not certain whether any of the information presented is new to you or helpful to your investigation. My take away is that there is no doubt that is a victim; she suffers to this day. At the same time there were other people looking to introduce girls to Epstein. This pattern apparently was ongoing for decades. EFTA00084188 introduction involvement was only in New York and not with minors. was shocked when she found out that Epstein was arrested in Florida. Should you feel that an interview is necessary, please propose a couple of dates before January 20, 2020 (I have an upcoming trial in late January). I will make my conference room available for the interview. Let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely. Jell" Jeffrey S. Pop, Esq. JEFFREY S. POP & ASSOCIATES Beverly Hills, California 90212-3429 fax www.poplawyer.com www.vaccineinjuryteam.com JEFFREY S. POP & ASSOCIATES A LAW CORPORATION Shan' MO CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mall Is for the personal and exclusive use of the recipient(s) named above. It contains confidential information from Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates. Its contents are not only to remain absolutely confidential, but may also be subject to the attorney silent privilege or coverage under the work-product doctrine. If you have received this transmission and are not the intended reciplent(s) or his/her agent, please be advised that any disclosure, use, review, copying, selling, dissemination, publication, or distribution of this transmission Is strictly unauthorized and prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender at the number above, return the original e-mail by mail, and delete the e-mall file from your computer. Postage is guaranteed. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you. From: ) fmaitto: Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 9:34 PM To: Jeff Cc: s Subject: RE: SDNY investigation, Jeff, Following up on our phone conversation today, I wanted to memorialize that, as discussed, we do not currently have reason to believe Ms. has criminal exposure based on what we are aware of in connection with her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, and your brief attorney proffer regarding the circumstances of those interactions are consistent with that view. In your further discussions with Ms. in advance of a further attorney proffer to address the general nature of her relationship with Mr. Epstein, as well as his employees or relevant close associates, if you have any concerns about additional possible exposure you should please feel free to be in touch with us again. As we also discussed, I believe any non-federal offenses would be well outside the relevant statute(s) of limitation, but of course if you wish to further research that issue, or consult with criminal counsel, we defer to you entirely. Please let us know if any other information would be useful at this stage, and hopefully we can be in touch in the coming weeks about productive next steps. EFTA00084189 thank you, M Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00084190