Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00084566DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: iS"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00084566
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: iS" To: ' Cc: Subject: RE: initial discovery production Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 21:20:35 +0000 Attachments: 2020-07-28„govemment_letter_re_protective_orderidocketed).pdf; 2020-07- 31,_GM,memorandum_&_order_granting_govemment_motion.pdf; 2020-07- 31„GM,signed_protective_order (docketed).pdf We wanted to briefly check with you on a couple issues. First, as we briefly discussed this past week, now that there is a protective order entered in the Maxwell case, we expect to begin making discovery productions to the defense in the very near future. As you know, defense counsel argued that they should be able to publicly identify victims in certain circumstances, which we vigorously opposed, and ultimately the judge ruled in our favor. The resulting protective order is exceptionally strong. I know you have some of these materials, but just to give them to you all in one place, attached are the Government's letter, the Court's opinion, and the Order. As you would expect, some of

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: iS" To: ' Cc: Subject: RE: initial discovery production Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 21:20:35 +0000 Attachments: 2020-07-28„govemment_letter_re_protective_orderidocketed).pdf; 2020-07- 31,_GM,memorandum_&_order_granting_govemment_motion.pdf; 2020-07- 31„GM,signed_protective_order (docketed).pdf We wanted to briefly check with you on a couple issues. First, as we briefly discussed this past week, now that there is a protective order entered in the Maxwell case, we expect to begin making discovery productions to the defense in the very near future. As you know, defense counsel argued that they should be able to publicly identify victims in certain circumstances, which we vigorously opposed, and ultimately the judge ruled in our favor. The resulting protective order is exceptionally strong. I know you have some of these materials, but just to give them to you all in one place, attached are the Government's letter, the Court's opinion, and the Order. As you would expect, some of the discovery we will begin to produce will include information about your client, including, e.g., her name and date of birth, in connection with documents we have gathered that require production. Consistent with the protective order, defense counsel may not disclose or distribute any discovery materials except under very strict conditions, and in any event the defendant and counsel "are strictly prohibited from publicly disclosing or disseminating the identity of any victims or witnesses referenced in the Discovery." To the extent they need to reference the identity of individuals as part of their investigation, e.g., in individual interviews, any potential defense witnesses and counsel are similarly prohibited from further disclosing or disseminating such identifying information. All of these appropriate restrictions notwithstanding, we nevertheless did want to let you know that we are beginning to make discovery productions, in an abundance of caution and in the interests of transparency. Additionally, when we make the initial discovery production, with your permission we may advise defense counsel that each victim in the Indictment is represented by counsel, and identify the counsel for each person (i.e., we would identify you as counsel for . The reason we would do that would be to preempt attempts at direct contact with represented witnesses by defense counsel or defense investigators. Please let us know if you have a preference on this, and we're also happy to discuss it via phone. As always, please don't hesitate to be in touch on any of these issues, we'll keep you advised of any significant developments, and thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00084566

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 37 Filed 07/30/20 177uja-1-44

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 37 Filed 07/30/20 177uja-1-44 1M. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0. DATE FILED:7/30/2020 20-CR-330 (MN) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Both parties have asked for the Court to enter a protective order. While they agree on most of the language, two areas of dispute have emerged. First, Ms. Maxwell seeks language allowing her to publicly reference alleged victims or witnesses who have spoken on the public record to the media or in public fora, or in litigation relating to Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein. Second, Ms. Maxwell seeks language restricting potential Government witnesses and their counsel from using discovery materials for any purpose other than preparing for the criminal trial in this action. The Government has proposed contrary language on both of these issues. For

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 33 Filed 07/28/20 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 33 Filed 07/28/20 Page 1 of 7 U.S. Department of Justice United Stales Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 28, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter with respect to the protective order to be entered in the above-captioned case, and to respond to the defendant's letter and submission of July 27, 2020 (the "Defendant Letter" or "Def. Ltr.") (Dkt. 29). The Government and defense counsel have conferred regarding a protective order several times via telephone and email between July 9, 2020, and today, including as recently as this morning. The Government and defense counsel have come to an agreement

19p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 33 Filed 07/28/20 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 33 Filed 07/28/20 Page 1 of 7 U.S. Department of Justice United Stales Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 28, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter with respect to the protective order to be entered in the above-captioned case, and to respond to the defendant's letter and submission of July 27, 2020 (the "Defendant Letter" or "Def. Ltr.") (Dkt. 29). The Government and defense counsel have conferred regarding a protective order several times via telephone and email between July 9, 2020, and today, including as recently as this morning. The Government and defense counsel have come to an agreement

19p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: 'a

From: 'a To: Ma Cc: Min alMIE > Subject: RE: initial discovery production Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 21:12:30 +0000 Attachments: 2020-07-31,_GM,_siped_protective_orderjdocketed).pdf; 2020-07- 28,_govemment_letter re_protective_order (docketed).pdf; 2020-07- 31,_GM,_memorandum_&_order_granting_govemment_motion.pdf We wanted to briefly check with you on a couple issues. First, as we've previously talked about (though not for some time), now that there is a protective order entered in the Maxwell case, we expect to begin making discovery productions to the defense this coming week. As you know, defense counsel argued that they should be able to publicly identify victims in certain circumstances, which we vigorously opposed, and ultimately the judge ruled in our favor. The protective order is exceptionally strong, and is attached along with the Government's letter on this issue and the Court's opinion. As you would expect, some of the discovery we will begin to produce will include

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: 'a"

From: 'a" To: a' Cc: Min 1 11 Subject: RE: initial discovery production Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 21:02:36 +0000 Attachments: 2020-07-28„govemment_letter_re_protective_orderidocketed).pdf; 2020-07- 31,_GM,memorandum_&_order_granting_govemment_motion.pdf; 2020-07- 31„GM,signed_protective_order (docketed).pdf We wanted to briefly check with you on a few issues. First, I expect that we will very shortly—hopefully Monday, but I expect not later than early this week—be producing materials to you in response to your Touhy request. That has been pending final supervisory approval this week, but we are continuing to follow up with the person who needs to approve and we expect it will go out shortly. As I previously mentioned, we are constrained in our ability to produce any materials obtained in connection with the grand jury process, which are subject to stringent restrictions under Rule 6(e) — I expect that will be noted in the letter, but I mention it given the relatively limited

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 37 Filed 07/30/20 177uja-1-44

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 37 Filed 07/30/20 177uja-1-44 1M. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0. DATE FILED:7/30/2020 20-CR-330 (MN) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Both parties have asked for the Court to enter a protective order. While they agree on most of the language, two areas of dispute have emerged. First, Ms. Maxwell seeks language allowing her to publicly reference alleged victims or witnesses who have spoken on the public record to the media or in public fora, or in litigation relating to Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein. Second, Ms. Maxwell seeks language restricting potential Government witnesses and their counsel from using discovery materials for any purpose other than preparing for the criminal trial in this action. The Government has proposed contrary language on both of these issues. For

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.