Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00085217DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 51 Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 1

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 51 Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 1 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 April 28, 2021 By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times") seeking the release of certain records related to Jeffrey Epstein. I write respectfully pursuant to Rule 4.B.2 of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases to seek leave to file under seal and ex parte a letter to the Court, which will be filed contemporaneously with this public letter on ECF and electronically related to it. A

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00085217
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 51 Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 1 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 April 28, 2021 By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times") seeking the release of certain records related to Jeffrey Epstein. I write respectfully pursuant to Rule 4.B.2 of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases to seek leave to file under seal and ex parte a letter to the Court, which will be filed contemporaneously with this public letter on ECF and electronically related to it. A

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 51 Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 1 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 April 28, 2021 By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times") seeking the release of certain records related to Jeffrey Epstein. I write respectfully pursuant to Rule 4.B.2 of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases to seek leave to file under seal and ex parte a letter to the Court, which will be filed contemporaneously with this public letter on ECF and electronically related to it. As set out in greater detail in the letter, the basis for the sealing request is that the letter contains sensitive and confidential information that cannot be described publicly in greater detail without compromising confidentiality. The Government has conferred with the Times about the filing of the sealed, ex parte letter. I thank the Court for its consideration of this submission. Respectfully submitted, AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney By: Steven J. Kochevar Steven J. Kochevar Assistant United States Attorney 300 Quarropas Street White Plains, NY 10007 Telephone: (914) 993-1928 Email: [email protected] EFTA00085217

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:20-CV-00833-PAE
Phone(914) 993-1928

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01398793

Subject: RE: MD approval for ACUs completed for High Risk Clients [I] From: Andrew Gallivan Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 To: Vaishali-P Mehta < Classification: For internal use only Approved. From: Vaishali-P Mehta Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 2:21 PM To: Andrew Gallivan Subject: FW: MD approval for ACUs completed for High Risk Clients [I] Classification: For internal use only Hi Andrew, In an effort to ensure that you have to approve only 1 email, I sent the below email, in hindsight I s

43p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00028741

0p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]

GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...

1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031870

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031532

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.