Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00086215DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USANYS)"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00086215
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: (USANYS)" To: Subject: FW: Epstein Sharing Order Part II Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:06:08 +0000 )" I> Your BFF •is on Part I all of next week... From: Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:56 PM To: (USANYS) < Cc: ) c s; Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II >; (USANYS) M , is it the intent to share those? If so, I'll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it's unnecessary. I don't think those are substantive dots but I defer. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II (USANYS) Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I'm not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be From: Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: ) Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II (USANYS) < Yes, I think this document accurately describes the materials we've received, with just a note that it doesn't appear to include revocations, so t

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: (USANYS)" To: Subject: FW: Epstein Sharing Order Part II Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:06:08 +0000 )" I> Your BFF •is on Part I all of next week... From: Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:56 PM To: (USANYS) < Cc: ) c s; Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II >; (USANYS) M , is it the intent to share those? If so, I'll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it's unnecessary. I don't think those are substantive dots but I defer. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II (USANYS) Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I'm not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be From: Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: ) Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II (USANYS) < Yes, I think this document accurately describes the materials we've received, with just a note that it doesn't appear to include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added. thanks, From: (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40 To: (USANYS) < Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II >; =— I've updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have now received. Would you take a look when you can? - I've tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks. Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I've accurately described/characterized the new stuff we're looking to share? EFTA00086215 Thanks, M EFTA00086216

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.