Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00086964DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "I

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00086964
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: "I To: al C C] to Subject: RE: updated draft Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 04:26:12 +0000 Attachments: Maxwell,_Ghislaine Transcri t 04-22-16).pdf; Maxwell,_Ghislaine_Transcript_(07-22- 16).pdf; 2020-05-09 interview notes (no 302).pdf Added, at least for me our share drive takes forever to get anything, so in case it's helpful, attached are the two GM depos as well as my notes on the recent interview. Also forgot to mention but you'll see I added a big rundown, and am extremely happy for any suggestions, including on tone, on that (and similar on the substantive count stuff). Thx. From: Sent: Thursday, may 14, 2020 00:22 To: Subject: updated draft I ended up just really really wanting to cross this off my to-do list, even if just in terms of the latest turn. I tried to do a track-changes version for easier review, but because the structure got completely overhauled it ends up being a huge mess and I think basically useless. So I'm sorry about that! The main changes ar

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "I To: al C C] to Subject: RE: updated draft Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 04:26:12 +0000 Attachments: Maxwell,_Ghislaine Transcri t 04-22-16).pdf; Maxwell,_Ghislaine_Transcript_(07-22- 16).pdf; 2020-05-09 interview notes (no 302).pdf Added, at least for me our share drive takes forever to get anything, so in case it's helpful, attached are the two GM depos as well as my notes on the recent interview. Also forgot to mention but you'll see I added a big rundown, and am extremely happy for any suggestions, including on tone, on that (and similar on the substantive count stuff). Thx. From: Sent: Thursday, may 14, 2020 00:22 To: Subject: updated draft I ended up just really really wanting to cross this off my to-do list, even if just in terms of the latest turn. I tried to do a track-changes version for easier review, but because the structure got completely overhauled it ends up being a huge mess and I think basically useless. So I'm sorry about that! The main changes are that I added the "substantive count is super aggressive and also a great idea" section up top; rearranged the false statements (both internally and where they are in the memo); and accepted a million changes. Very happy for comments on all, though especially on what you think of the categories for the statements — I don't really think they ultimately fall neatly into categories, but I think multiple people thought that would be preferable so curious what y'all think. Also the comments or changes that I didn't delete or accept are the ones that I want to talk through. Let me know if any questions, etc, and happy to chat any time, and thanks as always. EFTA00086964

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.