From: Nicole Simmons <[email protected]>

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 9

Reference

EFTA 00087551

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Summary

From: Nicole Simmons <[email protected]> To: 'Nathan NYSD Chambers' Cc: Jeff Pagliuca [email protected]>, Laura Menninger <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <ceverdellOcoheneresser.com>. "bcstemheim mac.com" <bcstemheim mac.com> " Subject: [EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) [Maxwell's Mom for Order re. Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c) Sub] Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 04:57:02 +0000 Attachments: 2021.11.14_Mtn_for Order_Auth_a_Sub_Pursnt_to_F.R.Crim.P_17(c) (3)_re._Feldman_.pdf; Ex._1.pdf Inline-Images: image00I.jpg Dear Judge Nathan: At the request of Jeffrey Pagliuca, please see attached Ms. Maxwell's Motion for an Order Authorizing a Subpoena Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P 17(c)(3). Pursuant to our established protocol, we are submitting the Motion and Exhibit to the Court under temporary seal to allow the government to propose any redactions it deems necessary. Regards, Nicole Nicole Simmons Haddon. Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East 10th

Persons Referenced (2)

Laura Menninger Nicole Simmons

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00021875

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00032783

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

To: Jeff Pagliuca

From: " To: Jeff Pagliuca Cc: Sabina Mariella "Si McCawley Laura Mennin er Subject: RE: Documents Per Judge Nathan's Order Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 01:20:49 +0000 Attachments: Ex._B_2021.04.05_BSF_Reply_re_Maxwell_Rule_17(c)_Subpoena_- _Prpsd_Redact.._[Govemment_Proposed_Redactions].pdf; 2021.04.05 JEISF_Reply_re_Maxwell_Rule_17(c)_Subpoent[Govemment_Proposed_Reda ctions].pdf; 2021.04.19_LAM_Joint_Letter_with_BSF_re_redactiontin_Rule_17_pleadingsiGovemm ent_Proposed_Redactions].pdf; 2021.04.02_Defts_Resp_to_BSF_Ltr._Motn_to_Quash_Rule_17_SubiGovernment_Propos ed Redactions].pdf; Ex. A_2021.04.02_Defts_Resp_to_BSF_Ltr._Motn_to_Quash_Rule_17_Sub_- Prp;c1.._[Govemment_Proposed_Redactions].pdf Good evening, Our team has reviewed the documents and intends to propose a limited number of redactions to protect third party privacy interests. Attached please find pdfs with our proposed redactions in red boxes. Would you please let me know your respective positions regarding th

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown