Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00087831DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 12 Filed 04/15/20 Page 1 of 2

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00087831
Pages
2
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 12 Filed 04/15/20 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Cheettbers sum New York New Yoe* 10007 April 15, 2020 By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times"). The parties respectfully submit this joint letter pursuant to the Court's Orders of March 5 and 13, 2020. See Dkt. Nos. 8, 10. The initial pretrial conference in this matter is currently scheduled to be held at 11:00 AM on April 20, 2020. See Dkt. No. 10. The parties respectfully propose that the initial pretrial conference be adjourned if this

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 12 Filed 04/15/20 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Cheettbers sum New York New Yoe* 10007 April 15, 2020 By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times"). The parties respectfully submit this joint letter pursuant to the Court's Orders of March 5 and 13, 2020. See Dkt. Nos. 8, 10. The initial pretrial conference in this matter is currently scheduled to be held at 11:00 AM on April 20, 2020. See Dkt. No. 10. The parties respectfully propose that the initial pretrial conference be adjourned if this letter sufficiently addresses the present issues in this case. On January 30, 2020, the Times filed its complaint initiating this action. See Dkt. No. 1. The Times seeks, pursuant to FOIA, the release of certain documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased defendant in United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 19-CRIM-00490 (S.D.N.Y.), and his BOP custody. On March 4, 2020, the Government filed its Answer to the Times's complaint. See Dkt. No. 7. BOP has not produced any documents in response to the Times's request. The Government's position is that any documents potentially responsive to the Times's request are exempt from disclosure under FOIA, including under FOIA Exemption 7(A), which protects from disclosure records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes "to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information . . . could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings?' 5 U.S.C. § 552(bX7)(A). The parties anticipate filing cross-motions for summary judgment on whether BOP's withholdings are appropriate under FOIA, but have failed to agree on a schedule for summary judgment briefing. The Government proposes to file its motion for summary judgment by July 15, 2020, with plaintiff's opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment due by August 17, 2020, the Government's reply and opposition due by September 7, 2020, and plaintiff's reply due by September 28, 2020. The Government respectfully requests a longer period of time than usual to file its opening brief and declaration in this matter because of the national emergency arising from COVID-19, to which the Government and BOP have dedicated substantial resources and which has affected BOP's operations and staffing, including BOP's FOIA staffing. The Times acknowledges the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and is of course willing to be flexible on the timing of summary judgment briefing. However, the time sought by the Government appears to the Times unnecessary for a case filed in January 2020 involving a EFTA00087831 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 12 Filed 04/15/20 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 blanket assertion of exemptions. Accordingly, the Times proposes that the Government file its motion for summary judgment by May 25, 2020 and that The Times file its opposition and cross- motion for summary judgment by June 29, 2020, with the Government's reply and opposition due by July 20, 2020, and The Times's reply due by August 10, 2020. The parties do not believe that settlement is possible at this time. As this is a FOIA action, the parties anticipate that any legal issues will be resolved through cross-motions for summary judgment without discovery. See, e.g., Wood y. FBI, 432 F.3d 78, 85 (2d Cir. 2005); Carney v. U.S. Dep'r of Justice, 19 F.3d 807, 812-13 (2d Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that they not be required to submit the proposed case management plan and scheduling order called for in the Court's Orders of March 5 and 13, 2020, particularly in light of the proposed summary judgment briefing schedule proposed herein. See Dkt. Nos. 8, 10. The parties thank the Court for its consideration of this submission. Respectfully submitted, GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney By: / 86 Chambers Street, 3rd Floor New York, NY 10007 Telephone: Fax: ( 7 Email: Cc (by ECF): Counsel of Record 4/15/20 The Court appreciates this letter. The parties will not be required to submit a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. The initial pretrial conference will be held telephonically, as scheduled, at 11 a.m. on April 20, 2020. Dial-In: (888) 363-4749 or (215) 446-3662 Access Code: 4684906 SO ORDERED. Pa A. PAUL A. ENGE United States District Judge EFTA00087832

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' „ti To: ' (USANYS)" Subject: FW: Request from Judge Engelmayer in Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:35:00 +0000 Attachments: Transcript_of 04092 l_Oral_Argument, Jimes_v_BOP,_20cv833.pdf From: (USANYS). Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 1:21 PM To: Strauss, Audrey (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS). (USANYS) (USANYS) (USANYS) ) (USANYS) < =›; (USANYS) •c ).; (USANYS) < > Subject: RE: Request from Judge Engelmayer in Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 Audrey, Thank you very much. I just received the full, final transcript and have attached it here. Have a great rest of the weekend I From: Strauss, Audrey (USANYS) Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 12:47 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) (USANYS) (USANYS) (USANYS) (USANYS) (USANYS) (USANYS) (USANYS) (USANYS) 1 ); (USANYS) < > Subject: RE: Request from Judge Engelmayer in Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 Thanks for sending this along. All of your papers are extremely well done. his going to set up a call

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 50 Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 50 Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 April 28, 2021 By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOR"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times") seeking the release of certain records related to Jeffrey Epstein. I write respectfully to seek a two-day extension, from April 30, 2021, to May 4, 2021, to complete the Government's initial production of records for the Court's in camera review, a one-month extension, from April 30, 2021, to May 31, 2021, of the parties' time to submit a sched

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USANYS)'

From: (USANYS)' To: "Strauss, Audrey (USANYS)" Cc:" USANYS (1 SANYS)' SANYS (USANYS "Loner an, Jessica (USANYS)" I (11SANYS (USANYS)" gig USANYS)" Sarah (USANYS)" Subject: Request from Judge Engelmayer in Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 03:57:46 +0000 Attachments: Draft_Transcript_of Final_Portion_of 04092 l_Oral_Argument,_Times_v_BOP,_20cv833.p df Audrey, I hope you're doing well. At an oral argument today, Judge Engelmayer asked me to convey a request to you regarding the Government's response to FOIA requests made by the New York Times seeking BOP documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. I will provide some background and paraphrase Judge Engelmayer's request here, but I am also attaching a draft transcript of the final portion of the oral argument because it may be most efficient to read the Court's request there directly, starting at page 11, line 15 of the attached. By way of background, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 (PAE), is a FOIA case where the

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 52 (Ex Parte) Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 52 (Ex Parte) Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 April 28, 2021 Submitted Ex Pane and Under Seal By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOR"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times") seeking the release of certain records related to Jeffrey Epstein. I write respectfully to update the Court on the status of United States v. Noel, I 9-cr-830 (AT), and to explain the basis for the Government's request, submitted contemporaneously by public letter motion, to extend the deadlines for t

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 37 Filed 12/08/20 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 37 Filed 12/08/20 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 December 7, 2020 By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times") seeking the release of certain records related to Jeffrey Epstein. BOP respectfully requests that that the deadline for BOP to produce any additional non-exempt material in response to plaintiff's FOIA request be extended from December 11, 2020, to January 8, 2021, and that the deadlines for the remaining submissions in this action be extend

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USANYS)"

From: (USANYS)" To: (USANYS)" <MIMIMIE> Subject: Re: Request from Judge Engelmayer in Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 13:00:15 +0000 He only sent me that portion so far. I asked him for the last piece just to have something to send toM yesterday. He says he'll send me the final today, and I will send that as soon as I have it. Thanks. Sent from my iPhone On Apr 10, 2021, at 7:32 AM, (USANYS) wrote: Do you mind sending me the entirety of the draft transcript? Sent from my iPhone On Apr 9, 2021, at 11:57 PM, (USANYS) wrote: I hope you're doing well. At an oral argument today, Judge Engelmayer asked me to convey a request to you regarding the Government's response to FOIA requests made by the New York Times seeking BOP documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. I will provide some background and paraphrase Judge Engelmayer's request here, but I am also attaching a draft transcript of the final portion of the oral argument because it may be most efficient to r

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.