Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00089263DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: '

From: ' To: "I Cc: 1 C Subject: RE: US v. Epstein Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:47:38 +0000 )" (USANYS) [Contractor]" Ah okay, thanks. From: (USANYS) [Contractor] < Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 09:47 To: Cc: Subject: RE: US v. Epstein Whatever is on the list below is what I sent out for upload to the database. I can't check to make sure as I no longer have the hard drive in my possession as it is on its way to you. From: < Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 9:44 AM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < Cc: Subject: RE: US v. Epstein 1<a; Sorry, to clarify, these are two NYC numbers that you have listed below, as ones that you saw and sent out. I just want to make sure those numbers are correct (don't include a typo, etc.) because I don't think we were under the impression that either was provided to us on the hard drive we got. (Hence also the question about whether we have any info on NYCO24328 — do we??) Thanks. From: (USANYS) [Contractor] < Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 09:22 T

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00089263
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: ' To: "I Cc: 1 C Subject: RE: US v. Epstein Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:47:38 +0000 )" (USANYS) [Contractor]" Ah okay, thanks. From: (USANYS) [Contractor] < Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 09:47 To: Cc: Subject: RE: US v. Epstein Whatever is on the list below is what I sent out for upload to the database. I can't check to make sure as I no longer have the hard drive in my possession as it is on its way to you. From: < Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 9:44 AM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < Cc: Subject: RE: US v. Epstein 1<a; Sorry, to clarify, these are two NYC numbers that you have listed below, as ones that you saw and sent out. I just want to make sure those numbers are correct (don't include a typo, etc.) because I don't think we were under the impression that either was provided to us on the hard drive we got. (Hence also the question about whether we have any info on NYCO24328 — do we??) Thanks. From: (USANYS) [Contractor] < Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 09:22 T

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' To: "I Cc: 1 C Subject: RE: US v. Epstein Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:47:38 +0000 )" (USANYS) [Contractor]" Ah okay, thanks. From: (USANYS) [Contractor] < Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 09:47 To: Cc: Subject: RE: US v. Epstein Whatever is on the list below is what I sent out for upload to the database. I can't check to make sure as I no longer have the hard drive in my possession as it is on its way to you. From: < Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 9:44 AM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < Cc: Subject: RE: US v. Epstein 1<a; Sorry, to clarify, these are two NYC numbers that you have listed below, as ones that you saw and sent out. I just want to make sure those numbers are correct (don't include a typo, etc.) because I don't think we were under the impression that either was provided to us on the hard drive we got. (Hence also the question about whether we have any info on NYCO24328 — do we??) Thanks. From: (USANYS) [Contractor] < Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 09:22 To: Cc: Subject: RE: US v. Epstein I sent out what we could identify as completed data sets. It is possible that the drives you have mentioned are part of the sets that we could not identify as a specific folder since they merged several devices in one folder. You should receive the hard drive today and you can take a look at what is on the drive and see what I could see. From: Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2020 7:14 PM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < > Cc: Subject: RE: US v. Epstein EFTA00089263 A couple questions on this list. First, are you sure that NYCO24392 was provided to us? I ask because as of 7/14 (last Tuesday), in an email =said we didn't have that drive yet — see the spreadsheet in the attached email — and I also referred to that number on Wednesday in our call as one we didn't have and CART didn't say anything different. The other question is, do you have any info on NYCO24328 in terms of device, serial number, etc? I ask because looking at the same chart that ent in the attached email last Tuesday, there doesn't appear to be *any* device with that identifier. The list goes , 327, 329. thanks, From: (USANYS) [Contractor] .ct > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 15:56 To: Subject: RE: US v. Epstein The following folders are being sent out for upload to Relativity: NYCO24363 NYCO24392 NYCO24328 NYCO24365 NYCO24366 NYCO24371 NYCO24383 Thank you. From: (USANYS) [Contractor] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 3:00 PM To: Subject: US v. Epstein Hello I wanted to know if you have a minute to talk. Thank you. EFTA00089264

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.