Case Fileefta-efta00090544DOJ Data Set 9(USANYS)"
Unknown1p1 persons
(USANYS)"
From: (USANYS)" To: (USANYS)" alMIE> Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor]" <=1=IMIE> Subject: Re: Andrew Statement Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 17:08:17 +0000 Thanks. Let's see whatMistributed and then discuss. > On Jun 8, 2020, at 12:53 PM, (USANYS) alMIN> wrote: > Since time is of the essence and I'm sure will have a lot to add, here is a quick draft. Would you like for me too loop them in as well? > Earlier today, a statement was issued by the UK law firm of Blackfords LLP on behalf of their client, Prince Andrew, regarding the communications between this Office and Andrew's counsel to interview their client. Blackfords' statement contains several false assertions regarding those discussions. Firstly, their statement claims that they were "given an unequivocal assurance that the discussions would remain confidential," which is false. The statement also falsely claims that this Office somehow communicated that the Duke is not a `target' of any criminal investigation into the condu
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.