Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00090544DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USANYS)"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00090544
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: (USANYS)" To: (USANYS)" alMIE> Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor]" <=1=IMIE> Subject: Re: Andrew Statement Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 17:08:17 +0000 Thanks. Let's see whatMistributed and then discuss. > On Jun 8, 2020, at 12:53 PM, (USANYS) alMIN> wrote: > Since time is of the essence and I'm sure will have a lot to add, here is a quick draft. Would you like for me too loop them in as well? > Earlier today, a statement was issued by the UK law firm of Blackfords LLP on behalf of their client, Prince Andrew, regarding the communications between this Office and Andrew's counsel to interview their client. Blackfords' statement contains several false assertions regarding those discussions. Firstly, their statement claims that they were "given an unequivocal assurance that the discussions would remain confidential," which is false. The statement also falsely claims that this Office somehow communicated that the Duke is not a `target' of any criminal investigation into the condu

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: (USANYS)" To: (USANYS)" alMIE> Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor]" <=1=IMIE> Subject: Re: Andrew Statement Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 17:08:17 +0000 Thanks. Let's see whatMistributed and then discuss. > On Jun 8, 2020, at 12:53 PM, (USANYS) alMIN> wrote: > Since time is of the essence and I'm sure will have a lot to add, here is a quick draft. Would you like for me too loop them in as well? > Earlier today, a statement was issued by the UK law firm of Blackfords LLP on behalf of their client, Prince Andrew, regarding the communications between this Office and Andrew's counsel to interview their client. Blackfords' statement contains several false assertions regarding those discussions. Firstly, their statement claims that they were "given an unequivocal assurance that the discussions would remain confidential," which is false. The statement also falsely claims that this Office somehow communicated that the Duke is not a `target' of any criminal investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein. > While this statement is not something we routinely issue as a matter of course, we felt it was important to state for the public in clear and unequivocal language: the career prosecutors of the Office have not violated any of the rules of confidentiality or guidelines referenced in this statement. Furthermore, any misunderstandings the Prince or his counsel may have could be resolved if he simply agreed to be interviewed. > Sent from my iPati EFTA00090544

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alleged testimony that Jeffrey Epstein paid a 17‑year‑old $15k to have sex with Prince Andrew and flew other young women for similar encounters

The passage links Jeffrey Epstein to a claim that a witness was paid $15,000 to have sex with Prince Andrew at age 17 and mentions additional flights of young women for sexual purposes. It provides sp Witness alleges she was flown to London by Epstein and paid $15k to have sex with Prince Andrew at a Epstein allegedly arranged flights for other young women for sexual encounters Bradley Edwards is

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01862525

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01364228

0p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Anecdotal recollections linking Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and high‑profile financiers

The passage offers personal impressions and vague connections but provides no concrete evidence, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It mentions well‑known figures, but only in a speculative, go Author claims to have met Epstein and Maxwell at parties and describes their behavior. Mentions Prince Andrew walking with Epstein and suggests a possible business‑related motive. References financie

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein’s Elite Network and Unverified Claims of Government ‘Bounty Hunting’

The passage lists numerous high‑profile individuals and institutions linked to Epstein, providing names and affiliations that could be pursued for financial or influence investigations. However, it la Epstein claimed to have worked as a “bounty hunter” recovering money for the government or wealthy c He was a limited partner at Bear Stearns under mentorship of Ace Greenberg and James Cayne. Member

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01964576

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.