Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00090574DOJ Data Set 9Other

" aMIMIE>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00090574
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To Cc: " aMIMIE> (NY) (FBI)" (NY) (FBI)" rout tact Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 21:30:19 +0000 I'm not sure who's the exact right person to ask this, so wanted to get everybody on one email chain about it — I have the hard drive than dropped off that has new Epstein search warrant materials, but it looks like there are also old materials (that I think we had previously received and uploaded??) on the hard drive, and so I'm not sure what's new. Just generally, an' I talked about this last week too, but it's basically impossible for us to keep track of what we're getting, and what has been completed, without some kind of identification or labeling system, along with a list of which devices have been extracted and downloaded. So for example on the hard drive currently, there are 38 folders labeled "loadFiles" through "37loadFiles" with a modified date of 11/14/19, which I think we may have already previously received — but I'

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To Cc: " aMIMIE> (NY) (FBI)" (NY) (FBI)" rout tact Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 21:30:19 +0000 I'm not sure who's the exact right person to ask this, so wanted to get everybody on one email chain about it — I have the hard drive than dropped off that has new Epstein search warrant materials, but it looks like there are also old materials (that I think we had previously received and uploaded??) on the hard drive, and so I'm not sure what's new. Just generally, an' I talked about this last week too, but it's basically impossible for us to keep track of what we're getting, and what has been completed, without some kind of identification or labeling system, along with a list of which devices have been extracted and downloaded. So for example on the hard drive currently, there are 38 folders labeled "loadFiles" through "37loadFiles" with a modified date of 11/14/19, which I think we may have already previously received — but I'm not sure, because we haven't gotten any info on which folders match up to which devices, etc. And then there's another folder titled "NYC024362" that has a modified date of 1/27/20, so I think that may be the materials we hadn't previously received? That folder by itself has more than 600,000 items. I don't want to giveaanything that we've already previously received and uploaded, and I can't tell from the folder or file names whether everything on the drive is new, or whether just additional materials were saved onto it in addition to what we already have-re you able to give us some guidance on this? Ultimately what we really need is a spreadsheet of every device, whether it's been dumped (or partially dumped), and then identifying that same info — which device, and what materials from it— are being given to us with each data transfer. Otherwise I think organizationally and for review purposes it will be a total disaster for us. We're happy to have a meeting on this if that's helpful — and thanks everybody for the assistance. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00090574

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.