Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00094116DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: '

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00094116
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: ' Subject: RE: Tartaglione Redactions Question Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 01:28:57 +0000 Hi Got it. Thank you! From: Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2021 8:57 PM To Subject: RE: Tartaglione Redactions Question Hi My view is that we redact references to Epstein's memory of the incident and injuries from the incident be redacted because they tend to reveal details of the incident. I would also redact references to Epstein's safety concerns in the SHU after the incident because they tend to suggest that Epstein was implying he was attacked during the incident. I've redboxed my proposed redactions in the email you sent. Thanks, From: Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2021 8:50 PM To: Subject: Tartaglione Redactions Question HiMand I think we have inconsistent Tartaglione redactions on the text in the attached. The text also appears in some medical records. Specifically, had the following note on page 2624: RIP - redact "but he said he thinks his memory for the incident (injury to his neck

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' Subject: RE: Tartaglione Redactions Question Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 01:28:57 +0000 Hi Got it. Thank you! From: Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2021 8:57 PM To Subject: RE: Tartaglione Redactions Question Hi My view is that we redact references to Epstein's memory of the incident and injuries from the incident be redacted because they tend to reveal details of the incident. I would also redact references to Epstein's safety concerns in the SHU after the incident because they tend to suggest that Epstein was implying he was attacked during the incident. I've redboxed my proposed redactions in the email you sent. Thanks, From: Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2021 8:50 PM To: Subject: Tartaglione Redactions Question HiMand I think we have inconsistent Tartaglione redactions on the text in the attached. The text also appears in some medical records. Specifically, had the following note on page 2624: RIP - redact "but he said he thinks his memory for the incident (injury to his neck) may be impaired because of his sleep apnea" and "He then asked if he could remain down here where it is 'safe' for the entire week" Should I redact that in these emails too? If so, could you please tell me specifically what on this page should be redacted? Or, if these sentences are innocuous and do not need to be redacted, can I lift the similar lines in the medical records? Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney 300 Quarropas Street White Plains, NY 10601 EFTA00094116

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Jeffrey Epstein

From: To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 20:51:45 +0000 Importance: Normal Mr. Lefkowitz, The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida was recently notified that the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, at your request, intends to review certain aspects of the investigation involving Mr. Epstein's sexual conduct involving minor victims. Naturally, until the DAG's Office has completed its review, this Office has postponed the current June 2, 2008 deadline requiring compliance by your client with the terms and conditions of the September 24, 2007 global resolution of state and federal liabilities, as modified by the United States Attorney's December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Sincerely, EFTA00214435

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: EMail 1 of 2: EPSTEIN -

From: To: Subject: RE: EMail 1 of 2: EPSTEIN - Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:30:42 +0000 Attachments: Exhibit_C_-_June_2020_Warrant.pdf; Exhibit_D _S1_20_Cr._330_(AJN)fflocketed).pdf; Exhibit_ _Application_for_Jtme_2020_Warrant.pdf Inline-Images: image002.jpg signed application/affidavit _- Maxwell Superseding_Indictment_- Al-July_2—019_Warrant.pdf; Exhibit_B_- Received, thank you very much= I noticed that the affidavit does not have the exhibits attached. To make sure they are maintained in the court's file, attached are the four exhibits that we submitted with the affidavit. Thar ..< ou, Assistant United States Attorney Cnothem Mori& of New York New Vnrk NV 10007 From: Sent: hursday, October 29, 2020 11:51 AM To: Cc: Subject: FW: EMail 1 of 2: EPSTEIN Good Morning Your signed Warrants are attached. United States District Court of New York FroH Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 7:18 PM signed application/affidavit EFTA00076701 To Cc: Subject: FW: EMail 1 of

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

11/28/07 WED 09:18 FAX 1 213 680 8500

11/28/07 WED 09:18 FAX 1 213 680 8500 KIRALAND&ELLIS LLP 11002 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND A/MIMED PARINUSHIPS Kenneth W: Start To Call Wrier Directly. (213) 680-8440 kstarrekirklend.com VIA FACSIMILE Honorable Alice S. Fisher Assistant Attorney General Department of Justice Criminal Division 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Room 2107 Washington, DC 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Fisher: 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 680-8400 www.kirkland.com November 28, 2007 Facsimile: (213) 680-8600 I represent Jeffrey Epstein, who, as you may be aware, was the target of a dual investigation by both state and federal authorities in Florida for acts relating to his interactions with numerous young women. As you may also be aware, Mr. Epstein has entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the "Agreement") with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (the "USAO") to resolve its criminal investigation of him

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EXHIBIT M

EXHIBIT M EFTA00039806 From: U Subject: Date: Fwd: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Sunday. February 24, 2019 8:18:01 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Dat • March 3 ?016 at 5:09.55 PM EST To: Subject: RE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Cool. Talk to you then. From: Sent: I hursday, March 03, 20th 5:05 PM To:I 2 Subject: HE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Tuesday at 4 is good. Thanks. From: Sent: hursday, March 03, 2011 10:24 AM To: Subject: HE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Sure. Sounds both intriguing and complicated. I uesday is better for me than Wednesday. How's Tuesday at 4 pm? From: Sent: I hursday. March 03, 201b k:08 AM To: ■ Subject: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Earlier this week Pete Skinner and two other lawyers came in to pitch a sex trafficking case against Jeffrey Epstein, a financier with homes abroad, in FL, and in Manhattan. They represent vho claims to have been prostituted by and f

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Hello

From: To: ' Subject: Hello Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 15:53:09 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi I read you are working on the Epstein case. It seems like an excellent and very important case! I'm glad (and unsurprised) to see you are doing so well up there. Best regards, Anthony Special Assistant United States Attorney Eastern District of Virginia EFTA00083564

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN RE:

IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Non-Prosecution Agreement IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein with one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure expressed in this Agreement; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation of Epstein's background and offenses including; knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to commit an offense against the United States, in violation of Titl

6p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.