From: '
Summary
From: ' (USANYS)" <1 To: ' illaiHYS)" " Subject: FW: As per our conversation Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:31:01 +0000 Embedded: Shoppers_Travel.msg (USANYS)" Just FYI, there's an email with the Rosenberg and Sud info in the Witness folder for also attached here, in case any of it is helpful - e.g., or did travel for Maxwell (??). From: (USANYS) Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 14:29 To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < Subject: RE: As per our conversation >; (NY) (FBI) <->; Hey, yes, the guy is and you can contact him at that email address or al. There was some reason we previously thought he (or the entity) had been represented by Seth Rosenberg, but when we contacted Rosenberg he said he didn't represent him/it so we just reached out directly. From: (USANYS) Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 14:24 To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < Subject: RE: As per our conversation Hey= >; (NY) (FBI) <->; The defense has given us notice they may offer this as an exhibit, so I
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Draft transcript excerpt mentions Jeffrey Epstein invoking the Fifth and a reference to Alan Dershowitz
The passage provides a vague, uncited reference to Epstein and Dershowitz refusing to answer questions in a hearing. It lacks concrete details—no dates, transactions, or specific allegations—making it Jeffrey Epstein allegedly took the Fifth Amendment during a court hearing. A question about Alan Dershowitz was raised, and he also invoked the Fifth. The excerpt is labeled as a rough draft and appe
Transcript excerpt from House Oversight deposition showing heated exchange over exhibit handling
The passage records a minor procedural dispute in a deposition with no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details. It offers little investigative value beyond confirming normal courtroom Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of misrepresenting the record. Dispute over labeling and copying of exhibits. Witness expresses willingness to disagree professionally.
Alleged testimony that Jeffrey Epstein paid a 17‑year‑old $15k to have sex with Prince Andrew and flew other young women for similar encounters
The passage links Jeffrey Epstein to a claim that a witness was paid $15,000 to have sex with Prince Andrew at age 17 and mentions additional flights of young women for sexual purposes. It provides sp Witness alleges she was flown to London by Epstein and paid $15k to have sex with Prince Andrew at a Epstein allegedly arranged flights for other young women for sexual encounters Bradley Edwards is
(USANYS)'
From: (USANYS)' To: " CRM" II II Cc: " (CRM)" Subject: R -: n epee ent: Prince n rew: e sa to to to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:58:39 +0000 lane-Images: image001.png Thanks, The below looks good to us. On the penalties: Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423 (transportation of minors) — maximum penalty is 10 years' imprisonment Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422 (coercion and enticement) — maximum penalty is 5 years' imprisonment Title 18, United States Code, Section 1591 (sex trafficking) — maximum penalty is 40 years' imprisonment From: (CRM) Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 5:49 AM (USANYS) C (CRM) Subject: RE: Independent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' We also just got the following questions on the new MLA request. I have given preliminary responses (as noted), but want to confirm with you. I. Has the witne
Allegations linking Alan Dershowitz, Virginia Roberts, and Jeffrey Epstein to alleged extortion and sexual abuse claims in a court filing
Allegations linking Alan Dershowitz, Virginia Roberts, and Jeffrey Epstein to alleged extortion and sexual abuse claims in a court filing The passage references high‑profile individuals (Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, a former federal judge) and claims of extortion, false accusations, and sexual abuse involving underage girls. While the text is fragmented and lacks concrete dates or transaction details, it suggests possible legal strategies and coordinated allegations that could merit further document review and witness interviews. The novelty is moderate because similar accusations have been reported, but the specific mention of a court filing and a “motion” provides a concrete lead for investigators. Key insights: Dershowitz alleges a plot to extort him involving false sexual abuse claims.; Virginia Roberts' allegations are tied to a declaration filed on Jan 15, 2015 against the government.; Reference to attempts to overturn Epstein’s non‑prosecution agreement.
deposition: A-5777
The witness testifies about their decision-making process when investigating jurors, including using Google searches, and explains why they didn't consult with the government about a potential issue with Juror No. 1 being a suspended lawyer.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.