Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00094903DOJ Data Set 9Other

Troutman Sanders LLP

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00094903
Pages
3
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York. New York 10022 troutman.com Bennet J. Moskowitz December 3, 2019 E-MAIL Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. Boies Schiller Flexner LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Re: Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein Dear Ms. McCawley: troutmari sanders We write in response to your letter dated November 22, 2019, posing two inquiries concerning the proposed Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (the "Program") presented by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate") on November 14, 2019 to the Superior Court of the United States Virgin Islands (the "USVI Court") for approval. Our response does not constitute the Co-Executors' position regarding discovery (e.g., whether discovery is appropriate at this time or the information you requested is discoverable in the actions pending in the Southern District of New York); rather, we respond in order to further the parties' discussions concerni

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York. New York 10022 troutman.com Bennet J. Moskowitz December 3, 2019 E-MAIL Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. Boies Schiller Flexner LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Re: Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein Dear Ms. McCawley: troutmari sanders We write in response to your letter dated November 22, 2019, posing two inquiries concerning the proposed Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (the "Program") presented by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate") on November 14, 2019 to the Superior Court of the United States Virgin Islands (the "USVI Court") for approval. Our response does not constitute the Co-Executors' position regarding discovery (e.g., whether discovery is appropriate at this time or the information you requested is discoverable in the actions pending in the Southern District of New York); rather, we respond in order to further the parties' discussions concerning the Program. Accordingly, we repeat your inquiries below and address them to the best of our ability based on currently available information. 1. "What is the total value of Epstein's Estate?" The total assets held by the Estate are a matter of public record: the Co-Executors' Petition for Probate and for Letters Testamentary, filed on August 19, 2019 in the United States Virgin Islands, valued the Estate's assets in excess of $577 million. However, the Estate is subject to substantial potential liabilities in an undetermined amount, which makes it impossible to accurately calculate the total value of the Estate. Among other things, (i) the Estate is subject to estate taxes in at least two jurisdictions, the United States and France; (ii) the United States Department of Justice has indicated that it may seek civil forfeiture of properties held by the Estate; and (hi) your clients and other claimants have lodged 17 separate lawsuits in New York state and federal courts, seeking multi-million-dollar damages awards. Moreover, the number and size of future claims is unknown: one plaintiffs' EFTA00094903 December 3. 2019 Page 2 troutman1 sanders counsel recently predicted that "[p]otentially dozens" more additional lawsuits will be filed, without specifying exact numbers of such cases or the damages that may be sought.' For these reasons, it is simply not possible at present for the Co-Executors to state the total value of the Estate. However, if you and other plaintiffs' counsel provide us with a complete report on how many additional claims your clients intend to assert — as well as a realistic assessment of damages to be sought in those claims — the Co-Executors can gain a better understanding of the Estate's potential liabilities. 2. "How much of Epstein's Estate will be set aside for compensating victims through the proposed claims resolution program?" The Co-Executors await approval of the Program by the USVI Court. In the interim, Program Administrator Jordana Feldman and Program Designers Kenneth Feinberg and Camille Biros are proceeding with preparation of a detailed Program protocol to establish a fair, independent claims resolution process as a voluntary alternative to protracted civil litigation. As we understand it, the Program Administrator intends to reach out to your firm and other plaintiffs' counsel for input on the content of that protocol. Once the Program protocol is finalized, the Co-Executors will submit it to the USVI Court for approval and seek an order to formally commence claims resolution proceedings under the Program. It remains to be seen how many claimants — your clients included — will decide to participate in the Program. When the number of participating claimants become clearer, the Co- Executors anticipate being better able to estimate how much money will ultimately be required to adequately fund the Program. It is the Co-Executors' intent that the Program be "open- ended" regarding amounts awarded — i.e., the Estate will not impose any absolute numerical cap on the Program's aggregate compensation payments. For any other questions you or your clients may have about the proposed Program, we urge you to contact Ms. Feldman and her team as soon as possible. It is also in all parties' interests for you to begin a constructive dialogue with Ms. Feldman and her team. We appreciate any assistance your firm and other plaintiffs' counsel can provide in enabling the Program to serve its desired function as a preferred, confidential, non-adversarial alternative to litigation, both for your clients and any other individuals seeking to resolve sexual abuse claims against Mr. Epstein or the Estate. See November 21, 2019 transcript of proceedings held in Doe v. Epstein. et at, 19-CV-07675 (GBD) (S.D.N.Y.) and VE v. Nine East 71st Street et at, 19-CV-07625 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y.), at 38:7-14. EFTA00094904 December 3. 2019 Page 3 Sincerely, Is/ Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz cc: David Brodie, Esq. (via Email) Andrew Buzin, Esq. (via Email) Kate Doniger, Esq. (via Email) Brad Edwards, Esq. (via Email) Julie Fink, Esq. (via Email) Arick Fudali, Esq. (via Email) Alan Goldfarb, Esq. (via Email) Brittany Henderson, Esq. (via Email) Daniel J. Kaiser, Esq. (via Email) Roberta Kaplan, Esq. (via Email) Jordan Merson, Esq. (via Email) Josh Schiller, Esq. (via Email) Laura Starr, Esq. (via Email) Mariann Wang, Esq. (via Email) troutmariP sanders EFTA00094905

Related Documents (6)

OtherUnknown

Florida Office

Cr 1) '.1.d Florida Office Bradley J. Edwards *Ol Seth M. Lehrman 't Brittany N. Henderson *0 Matthew D. Weissing EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC October 21, 2020 FOIA PRIVACY EXEMPTION VIA E-MAIL AND FEDEX The Honorable Geoffrey S. Berman United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorney 86 Chambers Street, Third Floor New York. New York 10007 Dear New York Office J. Stanley Pottinger j Admitted in California 0 Admitted in I>istrict of Columbia • Admitted m Florida t Admitted in New York Beard (:crtified Civil Trial lau)rr Re: Re tuest for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request) Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et al., SDNY Case No. 1:19-cv-07773 Victim: In follow up to our previous communications, please accept this as our formal written request for documentary and tangible evidence currently in the in the possession, custody, and control of the Department of Justice by way of the Southern District of New York relatin

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, I UNITED STATES Respondent. RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Motion to Dismiss, pursuant to Rules 12(6)(6) and 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and states: I. LITIGATION HISTORY On July 7, 2008, plaintiff Jane Doe filed her "Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771." (D.E. I). On the same day, this Court issued an Order directing the United States Attorney to file a response to the petition by 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, July 9, 2008. (D.E. 3). On July 9, 2008, the United States Attorney filed the "Government's Response to Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771." (D.E. 7). The Court held a hearing on July 11, 2008. On August 18, 2008, the Court held a

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

To: Paul Cassell <[email protected]>, Brad Edwards <[email protected]>

To: Paul Cassell <[email protected]>, Brad Edwards <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Proposed email to Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:57:54 +0000 Importance: Normal Dear Paul and Brad: As I promised, since returning to work on Tuesday, I have been working diligently on trying to provide you with the answers that you have requested in connection with the Jane Doe I. United States lawsuit. Both the referral of your allegations to the Office of Professional Responsibility and the request for our Office to "step aside" in the Jane Doe litigation are not insignificant matters. As you doubtless are aware, the position that you are asking us to adopt, simply by "stepping aside," will have repercussions for every U.S. Attorney's Office throughout the country, and, therefore, requires approval from the Department in Washington, D.C. We also are trying to balance our obligations to with our obligations to the other identified victims in the Epstein ma

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.