From: '
Summary
From: ' (USANYS)" ci To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" cl Subject: RE: Senate letter Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 14:35:45 +0000 Okay, thanks. I'll circulate more broadly. From: (USANYS)< > Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 10:32 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < Subject: Re: Senate letter I think that's right. There's not much to say - and your proposed response essentially parrots what is in the public record (with the addition of we will handle evidence accordingly, which seems harmless). Sent from my iPad On Aug 11, 2019, at 10:23 AM, (USANYS) < > wrote: You guys have thoughts on this? As knows, OLA's general guidance is either not to respond at all, or to respond by parroting back a combination of the question and stuff already in the public record. Here's my initial effort at mapping that guidance onto this question: As the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York stated yesterday, the investigation into the conduct charged in the Indictment previously file
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.