From: '
Summary
From: ' To:' )" )" Cc: ' )" Subject: Re: SDNY investigation Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:32:56 +0000 [=. [=. We connected with the attorney who represents the witness. She does not object to notifying the Met Police using her name. Should our agents submit the notification through regular channels, or does the legat intend to make notification in a different manner? Thanks, Sent from my iPhone On Sep 30, 2020, at 1:47 PM, cza wrote: Give me a call if you get the chance. I'd like to close the loop on my conversations with LEGAT US Mobile: On Sep 30, 2020, at 6:42 PM, - London ) < > wrote: Is there a counterpoint at OIA in Washington we should be emailing for OIA approval, or should we send you an email requesting approval? Thanks, From: Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 11:18 AM To: Cc: Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Is she OK with the Met Police knowing about her speaking with us? EFTA00095309 From: Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 4:17 PM To
Persons Referenced (6)
“...K will want to know if the conduct is also a UK crime. So a few questions: is the victim a UK national; did the alleged conduct occur on UK soil; if the conduct occur...”
United States“...BST - which would be mid- afternoon your time. Let me know what works. Thx, United States Embassy - London U.K. Mobile: From: Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 3:16 PM...”
The WitnessUnited States Attorney“...ou possibly available for a brief call on Monday? Thanks very much, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York New York, NY 10007 EFTA00095313”
The perpetrator“...ness, so we have not confirmed the details about where the abuse happened, who the perpetrator was, or how old she was when it happened. What we do know is (1) she is current...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...know is (1) she is currently in England, reporting some sort of past abuse by Jeffrey Epstein (and not necessarily the full scope of the information she may have in connect...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: In June 2020, a grand jury returned a six-count indictment charging Ghislaine Maxwell with facilitating the late financier Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minor victims from around 1994 to 1997. The Government filed a first (S1) superseding indictment shortly thereafter, which contained only small, ministerial corrections. The SI superseding indictment included two counts of enticement or transportation of minors to engage in illegal sex acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: In June 2020, a grand jury returned a six-count indictment charging Ghislaine Maxwell with facilitating the late financier Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minor victims from around 1994 to 1997. The Government filed a first (S1) superseding indictment shortly thereafter, which contained only small, ministerial corrections. The SI superseding indictment included two counts of enticement or transportation of minors to engage in illegal sex acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United States Attorney's Office in Miami (the "USAO"), not only has it has remained unwilling to address these issues, but Mr. Epstein's defense counsel has been instructed to limit its contact to the very prosecutors who are the subject of this misconduct complaint. For your review, this document summarizes the USAO's conduct in this case. Background 1. In March 2005, the Palm Beach Police Department opened a criminal investigation of Palm Beach resident, Jeffrey E. Epstein. The press has widely reported that Mr. Epstein is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton. 2. In July 2006, after an intensive probe, including interviews of dozens of witnesses, re
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: In June 2020, a grand jury returned a six-count indictment charging Ghislaine Maxwell with facilitating the late financier Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minor victims from around 1994 to 1997. The Government filed a first (S1) superseding indictment shortly thereafter, which contained only small, ministerial corrections. The SI superseding indictment included two counts of enticement or transportation of minors to engage in illegal sex acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 1 of 54
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 1 of 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIM RIGHTS ACT AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies, and states: I. INTRODUCTION The issue before this Court is whether the petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, had any rights under 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a), in the absence of a criminal charge being filed in the Southern District of Florida, charging someone with the commission of a federal crime in which petitione
H A D D O N
H A D D O N MORGAN FOREMAN November 1, 2021 VIA EMAIL United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Counsel: Haddon Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey S. PairBoca 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com [email protected] Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell through counsel, submit the following summary pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(C). I. EXPERT DISCLOSURE BY THE DEFENSE A. Dr. Elizabeth Loftus Dr. Loftus is the Distinguished Professor of Psychological Science and Law at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. Dr. Loftus is one of the nation's leading experts on the science of memory. In addition to her experience as an academic and clinical researcher, she has been an expert witness or consultant in hundreds of cases. Her extensive experience and credentials are recited in her cur
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.