Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00096648DOJ Data Set 9

(USANYS)"

Other

From: To: (USANYS)" Subject: Re: Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:12:05 +0000 (USANYS)" <1 Okay, great. Will send back. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 19, 2020, at 9:10 AM, Those edits look good. And yes, I agree. From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, November 19, 20209:04 AM To: Subject: RE: (USANYS) (USANYS) < wrote: •c ) I think the change from testified to informed law enforcement is a good one. I added a little more color to that point below. On the Fatico, I think I would stay silent on that issue for purposes of this, but that's the line I would be inclined to use in a sentencing submission or at a sentencing proceeding if we had to - i.e., doesn't dispute that these victims told law enforcement these facts, and the Government doesn't dispute that disputes those accounts but neither party seeks a Fatico hearing to resolve the issue. From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 8:56 AM To: (USANYS) Subject: FW: I made a couple of edits to the new language, bu

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00096648
Pages
3
Persons
1
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.