Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00099211DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: Maxwell Order on Flashlights/Sleep Disruptions

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00099211
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To: Cc: Subject: Maxwell Order on Flashlights/Sleep Disruptions Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 21:04:39 +0000 FYI, Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's request to direct the MDC to stop the flashlight checks, but (reasonably) directed the MDC to consider whether sleep disruptions can be reduced for pretrial detainees, and to ensure that Maxwell is only subjected to necessary security protocols. ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On April 29, 2021, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell wrote to the Court requesting that the Court address her sleeping conditions, with particular emphasis on counsel's representation, unsupported by affidavit or other factual showing, that guards are shining a flashlight in Maxwell's eyes every 15 minutes at night. Dkt. No. 256. Defense counsel claims that the flashlight surveillance in Maxwell's eyes is disrupting her sleep, which in turn is impacting her ability to prepare for and withstand trial. The Court sought more information by ordering the Government to

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Cc: Subject: Maxwell Order on Flashlights/Sleep Disruptions Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 21:04:39 +0000 FYI, Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's request to direct the MDC to stop the flashlight checks, but (reasonably) directed the MDC to consider whether sleep disruptions can be reduced for pretrial detainees, and to ensure that Maxwell is only subjected to necessary security protocols. ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On April 29, 2021, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell wrote to the Court requesting that the Court address her sleeping conditions, with particular emphasis on counsel's representation, unsupported by affidavit or other factual showing, that guards are shining a flashlight in Maxwell's eyes every 15 minutes at night. Dkt. No. 256. Defense counsel claims that the flashlight surveillance in Maxwell's eyes is disrupting her sleep, which in turn is impacting her ability to prepare for and withstand trial. The Court sought more information by ordering the Government to confer with legal counsel for the Bureau of Prisons and to respond to certain questions. Dkt. No. 257. In response, the Government states that MDC staff conduct flashlight checks of all inmates as a matter of course. Dkt. No. 270. As reported by the Government, inmates housed with cell mates in the Special Housing Unit are checked with flashlights every 30 minutes. Inmates housed with others in the general population are checked multiple times per night at regular intervals. The Government further reports that to conduct the checks, flashlights are pointed at the ceiling of the cell to confirm that the inmate is present, breathing, and not in distress. As the Government explains, there are a number of neutral reasons why BOP's flashlight checks of Maxwell are relatively more frequent than those of other inmates, including that Maxwell is housed alone, the nature of the charges, and the potential stress for inmates that can arise in high-profile cases. The MDC has determined that these factors necessitate more frequent safety and security checks. The Government also indicates that the prohibition on eye masks is a generally applicable policy, but that Maxwell, like other inmates, may use other noncontraband items to cover her eyes. To the extent that Maxwell's April 29, 2021 letter asks the Court to override BOP's determination as to the frequency of appropriate safety and security check procedures, that request is denied as factually unsubstantiated and legally unsupported. Certainly nothing in the record plausibly establishes that current protocols interfere with Maxwell's ability to prepare for her trial and communicate with her lawyers. Defense counsel's May 7, 2021 letter, Dkt. No. 272, describes generalized grievances but makes no additional specific and supported application for relief. Nevertheless, the Court urges the MDC to consider whether sleep disruption for pretrial detainees can be reduced. The Court also admonishes the MDC and the Government to continue to ensure that Maxwell is subjected to only those security protocols that BOP determines are necessary for her safety and security, based upon neutral and applicable factors, and consistent with the treatment of similarly situated pre-trial detainees. The Government shall provide a copy of this Order to the Warden and General Counsel for the MDC. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 5/14/2021) (In!) EFTA00099211

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

No. 21-770 & 21-58

No. 21-770 & 21-58 In the ZiRita) *tates Court of Apprat5 for the *mufti Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Appellant. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 20-CR-330 (AJN) Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's Appendix to the Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release Leah S. Saffian LAW OFFICES OF LEAH SAFFIAN 15546 Meadowgate Road Encino, California 91436-3429 Tel: (858)488-2765 David Oscar Markus *Counsel of Record MARKUS/MOSS PLLC 40 N.W. Third Street, PH 1 Miami. Florida 33128 Tel: mar aw.com EFTA00089465 Appendix* App. 86 Doc. 282 Doc. 256 Second Circuit Court Order April 27, 2021 Lower Court Order May 14, 2021 Ghislaine Maxwell letter regarding conditions at Metropolitan Detention Center April 29, 2021 .0 Doc. 270 Government's Response to Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions at Metropolitan Detention Center May 5, 2021 Doc. 272 Ghislaine Maxwell's Reply regarding conditions at

20p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER RENEWED MOTION FOR BAIL Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00154512 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 ARGUMENT 7 1. Reconsideration of the Court's Bail Decision is Appropriate Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(O 7 II. Ms. Maxwell Should Be Granted Bail Under the Proposed Strict Bail Conditions 10 A. Ms. Maxwell Has Deep Family Ties to the United States and Numerous Sureties to Support Her Bond 10 1. Ms. Maxwell is Devoted to Her Spouse and Would Never Destroy Her Family By Leaving the Country 11 2. A Number of Ms. Maxwell's Family and Friends, and the Security Company Prote

45p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER RENEWED MOTION FOR BAIL Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim New York, NY 10011 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00094289 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 ARGUMENT 7 I. Reconsideration of the Court's Bail Decision is Appropriate Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(O 7 II. Ms. Maxwell Should Be Granted Bail Under the Proposed Strict Bail Conditions 10 A. Ms. Maxwell Has Deep Family Ties to the United States and Numerous Sureties to Support Her Bond 10 1. Ms. Maxwell is Devoted to Her Spouse and Stepchildren and Would Never Destroy Her Family By Leaving th

45p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 78 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 78 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mono Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 December 1, 2020 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 1212120 The parties jointly submit this letter in response to the Court's November 24, 2020 order directing the parties to meet and confer regarding the defendant's request that the warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center ("MDC") report directly to the Court and counsel on the defendant's conditions of detention. (Dkt. No. 76). Over the past week, the Government has spoken with MDC legal counsel regarding the defendant's conditions

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

COHEN & GRESSER LLP September 21, 2020 BY EMAIL , Esq. Esq. Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) De 800 Thrd Avon,* New York NY 10022 ♦1 212 957 7600 phone wenecohengesseecom We write to address three issues. First, we write to express once again our dissatisfaction with the incomplete and inadequate production of discovery to Ms. Maxwell in the MDC, and to demand that the government find an immediate solution that will permit Ms. Maxwell to review all of the discovery materials produced to date. Second, we write to request that the government set up a time at the earliest convenience when Ms. Maxwell and defense counsel can review the documents marked as "Highly Confidential" in the discovery materials. Third, we write to register our objection to the onerous conditions of confinement to which Ms. Maxwell is subjected, which are entirely

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 21-58. Document 89-1, 05/17/2021, 3102450, Pagel of 14

Case 21-58. Document 89-1, 05/17/2021, 3102450, Pagel of 14 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-857.8500 MOTION INFORMATION STATEMENT Docket Num 21-770/21-58 ber(s): Caption [use short Ski Motion for: Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release Set forth below precise. complete statement of relief sought: Ghislaine Maxwell renews her motion for pretrial release or in the alternative, remand for an evidentiary hearing. United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell MOVING PARTY: Ghislaine Maxwell OPPOSING PARTY: United States of America 9Plaintiff ElDelendant ZAppellant/Petkioner nAppeUee/Respondent MOVING ATTORNEY: David Oscar Markus Markus/Moss PLLC OPPOSING ATTORNEY: , AUSA [name of attorney, with firm address, phone number and e-mail) United States Attorney's Office, So. Dist. of NY 40 NW Third Street, PH 1, Miami, Florida 33128 One Saint Andrew's Plaza, New York

34p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.