Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00099251DOJ Data Set 9Other

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff:Appellee, ) Appeal No. 19-2221-er ) v. ) ) JEFFREY EPSTEIN ) ) Defendant-Appellant ) ) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by counsel for Jeffery Epstein, Defendant- Appellant, and the United States of America, Appellee, that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42, this appeal shall be dismissed with prejudice. The parties understand and agree that, once dismissed, the appeal may not be reinstated. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that neither party shall be entitled to recover costs, expenses or fees from the other party. EXECUTED on August . , 2019. /s/ Reid Weingarten Reid Weingarten Martin G. Weinberg Counsel to Defendant- Appellant Je Epstein Counse to Appe ee United States of America EFTA00099251

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00099251
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff:Appellee, ) Appeal No. 19-2221-er ) v. ) ) JEFFREY EPSTEIN ) ) Defendant-Appellant ) ) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by counsel for Jeffery Epstein, Defendant- Appellant, and the United States of America, Appellee, that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42, this appeal shall be dismissed with prejudice. The parties understand and agree that, once dismissed, the appeal may not be reinstated. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that neither party shall be entitled to recover costs, expenses or fees from the other party. EXECUTED on August . , 2019. /s/ Reid Weingarten Reid Weingarten Martin G. Weinberg Counsel to Defendant- Appellant Je Epstein Counse to Appe ee United States of America EFTA00099251

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff:Appellee, ) Appeal No. 19-2221-er ) v. ) ) JEFFREY EPSTEIN ) ) Defendant-Appellant ) ) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by counsel for Jeffery Epstein, Defendant- Appellant, and the United States of America, Appellee, that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42, this appeal shall be dismissed with prejudice. The parties understand and agree that, once dismissed, the appeal may not be reinstated. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that neither party shall be entitled to recover costs, expenses or fees from the other party. EXECUTED on August . , 2019. /s/ Reid Weingarten Reid Weingarten Martin G. Weinberg Counsel to Defendant- Appellant Je Epstein Counse to Appe ee United States of America EFTA00099251

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00028078

0p
House OversightUnknown

Epstein hosted Qatari foreign minister and attorney‑friend Reid Weingarten, linking U.S. political‑legal circles to Qatar amid World Cup bribery concerns

Epstein hosted Qatari foreign minister and attorney‑friend Reid Weingarten, linking U.S. political‑legal circles to Qatar amid World Cup bribery concerns The passage suggests a convergence of high‑profile actors – Jeffrey Epstein, Qatar’s foreign minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim, and Reid Weingarten (a lawyer tied to Eric Holder and major corporate defendants) – discussing financing of ‘bad guys’ and potential influence over the World Cup bid. While the details are anecdotal and lack hard evidence (no dates, transactions, or documented meetings), the combination of a foreign minister, a U.S. attorney‑general confidant, and a convicted financier creates a strong investigative lead on possible foreign influence, bribery, or illicit financial flows. The novelty is moderate (newly surfaced anecdote) and the controversy high, but the lack of concrete documentation keeps the score just below the blockbuster threshold. Key insights: Epstein met with Qatar’s foreign minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim in a private dinner setting.; Reid Weingarten, a lawyer for high‑profile corporate defendants and close to former AG Eric Holder, attended the breakfast the next morning.; Conversation allegedly touched on Qatar’s financing of extremist groups and the potential impact on the 2022 World Cup bid.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

DS9 Document EFTA00352416

1p
Court UnsealedJul 15, 2019

Letter Motion

Letter Motion, USA v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490-1 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 15, 2019)

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>

3p
House OversightUnknown

Email hints at alleged personal connections to Ghislaine Maxwell and possible intimidation by unknown parties

Email hints at alleged personal connections to Ghislaine Maxwell and possible intimidation by unknown parties The passage contains vague references to "new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell" and mentions individuals linked to a Stone Ridge board, but provides no concrete details, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It suggests possible intimidation or surveillance, yet lacks verifiable facts or clear connections to high‑profile actors, limiting investigative usefulness. Key insights: Mentions Ghislaine Maxwell in a cryptic context.; References Stone Ridge board membership and a former classmate relationship.; Alleges personal communications were tracked and bribed.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.