Subject: RE: OPR
Summary
From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: OPR Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:59:53 +0000 Got it, thanks. I'll just plan to note in the cover letter that the report is publicly available, but we are producing a copy to the defense as a courtesy. From: Sent: Monday, February 1, 20212:58 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: OPR Sorry for the multiple emails, but one final point on this — OPR is asking that we not affirmatively accuse Congress of leaking/releasing the report but simply say that it is publicly available or the press has gotten a copy or something like that. Happy to review the cover letter if that would be helpful. From: Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:08 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: OPR Makes sense, thanks. From: Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:07 PM To: >; Cc: Subject: RE: OPR I think that's fine, although I would definitely note in producing it that you are doing so as a courtesy since it is widely available and has been since November 2020, so they can't argue we sandbagged the
Persons Referenced (2)
“...very much,. In that case, it seems to me we can go ahead and produce a copy to defense counsel and note in our cover letter that the report is also publicly available. From...”
U.S. Attorney“...comidocument/484513037/Dept-of-Justice-Jeffrey-Epstein-Plea-Deal-Investigation U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York Tel. EFTA00099670”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.