Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00100369DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Ostrowski, Jeffrey" <[email protected]>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00100369
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: "Ostrowski, Jeffrey" <[email protected]> To: Subject: reporter query about Epstein Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 18:25:56 +0000 I'm writing about the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein, and I wonder if the government it plans to pursue the Palm Beach property. I'm trying to reconcile the mention forfeiture of "any property" with the lack of a specific mention of the address or legal description of the El Brillo Way real estate. Thanks. Jeff Ostrowski Reporter The Palm Beach Post I Palm Beach Daily News I GateHouse Florida This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the intended recipient. you must not use, copy, disclose or lake any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by sending a reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. EFTA00100369

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Ostrowski, Jeffrey" <[email protected]> To: Subject: reporter query about Epstein Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 18:25:56 +0000 I'm writing about the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein, and I wonder if the government it plans to pursue the Palm Beach property. I'm trying to reconcile the mention forfeiture of "any property" with the lack of a specific mention of the address or legal description of the El Brillo Way real estate. Thanks. Jeff Ostrowski Reporter The Palm Beach Post I Palm Beach Daily News I GateHouse Florida This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the intended recipient. you must not use, copy, disclose or lake any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by sending a reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. EFTA00100369

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.