Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00100670DOJ Data Set 9Other

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00100670
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS & ST. JOHN ************ ****** * ********* **** IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Deceased. PROBATE NO. ST-19-PB-80 ACTION FOR TESTATE ADMINISTRATION RESPONSE TO CREDITOR JANE DOE'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE: REQUEST FOR RULING ON EXPEDITED MOTION FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF A VOLUNTARY CLAIMS RESOLUTION PROGRAM COME NOW the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate"), DARREN K. INDYKE AND RICHARD D. KAHN, and respond to Creditor Jane Doe's Motion for Extension of Time as follows: 1. Creditor Jane Doe seeks an extension of time to December 23, 2019 to respond to the Co-Executors' Expedited Motion for Establishment of a Voluntary Claims Resolution Program ("Expedited Motion"), filed on November 14, 2019. 2. There is no need for this Honorable Court to extend Creditor Jane Doe's time to respond to the Expedited Motion. As explained more fully in (i) the Expedited Mo

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS & ST. JOHN ************ ****** * ********* **** IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Deceased. PROBATE NO. ST-19-PB-80 ACTION FOR TESTATE ADMINISTRATION RESPONSE TO CREDITOR JANE DOE'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE: REQUEST FOR RULING ON EXPEDITED MOTION FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF A VOLUNTARY CLAIMS RESOLUTION PROGRAM COME NOW the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate"), DARREN K. INDYKE AND RICHARD D. KAHN, and respond to Creditor Jane Doe's Motion for Extension of Time as follows: 1. Creditor Jane Doe seeks an extension of time to December 23, 2019 to respond to the Co-Executors' Expedited Motion for Establishment of a Voluntary Claims Resolution Program ("Expedited Motion"), filed on November 14, 2019. 2. There is no need for this Honorable Court to extend Creditor Jane Doe's time to respond to the Expedited Motion. As explained more fully in (i) the Expedited Motion, (ii) the Co-Executors' Request for Ruling on Expedited Motion for Establishment of a Voluntary Claims Resolution Program (filed December 4, 2019), and (iii) the Co-Executors' Request for Immediate Hearing or Conference Regarding Expedited Motion for Establishment of a Voluntary Claims Resolution Program (filed contemporaneously herewith), the Co-Executors seek at this juncture only the Court's authorization to use Estate funds to retain the services of independent, nationally recognized claims administration experts — Jordana Feldman, Kenneth Feinberg and Camille EFTA00100670 Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein Probate No. ST-19-PB-80 Response to Creditor Jane Doe's Request for Extension of Time Page 2 Biros — so that they may promptly proceed with implementation of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (the "Program") and design of a Program protocol ("Protocol") to establish a fair, independent claims resolution process for purposes of resolving sexual abuse claims against Jeffrey E. Epstein, deceased. It is undisputed that Creditor Jane Doe and her counsel — as well as all other claimants and their counsel in the stateside litigations — will have the unfettered opportunity to provide their input on the Protocol. Only after the Protocol is developed and finalized will the Co-Executors submit it to the Court for approval, and will seek an order to formally commence claims resolution proceedings under the Program. In the event that Creditor Jane Doe objects to the Protocol (or any other aspect of the Program), she may lodge her objection with the Court at that time. 3. There is also an extraordinary danger in allowing Creditor Jane Doe to now slow down the design and implementation of the Program — the inevitable, unfortunate result of granting her request for an extension of time. As explained more fully in the Co-Executors' multiple applications to the Court noted above, a substantial risk exists that further delay will derail the proposed Program before it can succeed. That would be a disastrous result for both claimants and the Estate. Accordingly, and as set forth more fully in the contemporaneously filed Request for Immediate Hearing or Conference Regarding Expedited Motion for Establishment of a Voluntary EFTA00100671 Estate opeffiey E. Epstein Response to Creditor Jane Doe's Request for Extension of Time Probate No. ST-I9-PB-80 Page 3 Claims Resolution Program, it is respectfully requested that this Honorable Court deny the Motion for Extension of Time. Dated: December 13, 2019 Respectfully, CHRIST° H AL KOB IN, ESQ. ANDREW W. HEYMANN, ESQ. WILLIAM L. BLUM, ESQ. SHARI N. D'ANDRADE, ESQ. MARJORIE WHALEN, ESQ. V.I. Bar Nos. 136, 966, 1221 & R2019 KELLERHALS FERGUSON KROBLIN PLLC ng MaS V.1. Telephone: Facsimile: Email: EFTA00100672 Estate of Jeflity E. Epstein Probate No. ST- I9-PB-80 Response to Creditor Jane Doe's Request for Extension of Time Page 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 13th day of December 2019, 1 caused a true and exact copy of the foregoing Response to Creditor Jane Doe's Request for Extension of Time Re: Request for Ruling on Expedited Motion for Establishment of a Voluntary Claims Resolution Program to be served via electronic mail upon: John H. Benham, Esq. Benham, P.C. St. Thomas, VI 00801 Douglas B. Chanco, Esq. ChancoSchiffer P.C. A. Jeffrey Weiss, Esq. A.J. Weiss & Associates Richard P. Boume-Vanneck, Esq. Law Offices of Richard Bourne-Vanneck Sean Foster, Esq. oberts, P.C. St. Thomas, VI 00804 95703456 I EFTA00100673

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

JANE DOE I JEFFREY EPSTEIN LITIGATION

JANE DOE I JEFFREY EPSTEIN LITIGATION RELEVANT PLEADINGS Docket No. Date Description 12 6/20/08 Defendant's Motion to Stay 13 6/20/08 Defendant's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer 16 7/1/08 Defendant's Notice Concerning Motion to Stay 23 7/17/08 Defendant's Motion to File Ex Parte and Under Seal 24 7/17/08 Defendant's "Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action" 31 7/29/08 Defendant's Notice of Filing Exhibits (Attaching Villafaiia Declaration from victims' rights suit) 33 8/5/08 Order Denying Motion to Stay 34 8/5/08 Order Denying Motion to Seal 37 8/12/08 Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal 38 8/12/08 Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion to Stay 40 9/4/08 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint 41 9/22/08 Plaintiff's Memorandum in Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint 45 9/30/08 Order Setting Trial Date and Discovery Deadlines 46 10/6/08 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Motion fo

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.