Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00101144DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USANYS)"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00101144
Pages
5
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: (USANYS)" To: (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Discovery review project Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 20:33:41 +0000 Yes sure From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:33 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project That works for me. Should we send to chiefs for their review? From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:31 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project So the number we are producing is reflected through the bates range, I think. On the anonymized list, why don't we just say a list of custodians is available if requested? From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:26 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project This looks fine with two suggestions: - Do we want to mention the number of items we are producing? - Do we want to provide an anonymized list of the individuals whose email accounts we have? From: (USANYS) < Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 3:56 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: (USANYS)" To: (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Discovery review project Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 20:33:41 +0000 Yes sure From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:33 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project That works for me. Should we send to chiefs for their review? From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:31 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project So the number we are producing is reflected through the bates range, I think. On the anonymized list, why don't we just say a list of custodians is available if requested? From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:26 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project This looks fine with two suggestions: - Do we want to mention the number of items we are producing? - Do we want to provide an anonymized list of the individuals whose email accounts we have? From: (USANYS) < Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 3:56 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project Here's a revised letter with the discussion of the email searches in a footnote. Let me know what you think and then we can copy it over to the other one. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 1:10 PM To: (USANYS) < > Subject: FW: Discovery review project Would you be able to review and add the language about the email searches? From: (USANYS) [Contractor] < Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 1:08 PM EFTA00101144 To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project Redactions and stamping are all set. Everything is currently being zipped for upload to USAfx. I've drafted up cover letters to both Noel and Thomas. They are attached and saved on the shared. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 12:10 PM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project Great! From: (USANYS) [Contractor] Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 12:01 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project Once I apply the redactions and stamp those documents, the production will be ready to go out. I will let you know once that is finished. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 11:42 AM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] Cc: (USANYS) .c M> Subject: FW: Discovery review project As per the attached, there are no additional redactions in the two outstanding FOIA email files. Let us know where the discovery stands. Thanks, From: (USANYS) Sent: Friday, October 09, 2020 4:06 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project Hi I apologize for the delay, I've reviewed the two files please see attached V3 of the spreadsheet. I am flagging 2 parts I was uncertain about, similar to earlier. (See below & in the spreasheet) C On Emails 2 Part 4: I did note the same category as earlier with an email chain from Tartaglione's counsel regarding leak/retaliation at MCC of a news story of Tartaglione questioned about attack on Epstein, and also on pg. 104 where Epstein informs a psychologist that Tartaglione discussed potentially injuring him without a guards' report. EFTA00101145 But both of those I was a bit uncertain whether they should be withheld. Hope this helps! From: (USANYS) • ) Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 10:39 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Re: Discovery review project Perfect. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 9, 2020, at 10:38 AM, (USANYS) c wrote: Hi Yes of course! I'm in class right now, but I should be able to work on this afternoon, and hopefully turn it back around by around 3pm if that's okay? From: (USANYS) Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 10:32 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project There are replacements for the two corrupt files in the same shared directory you used before. Would you be able to take a look at those today and add them to this version of the spreadsheet (which has a few edits from what you sent)? Thanks so much, From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 12:02 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project Okay, I finished up the remaining (pending the 2 pdfs I cannot open). I also noticed an error in the previous excel sheet, please utilize V2 moving forward (attached). EFTA00101146 I grouped & highlighted 3 portions of different PDFs that, potentially could be withheld, as they're email correspondence regarding Tartaglione but in relation to an Epstein incident. I tried to better define them in the spreadsheet and color coded by grouping. For the most part, each group is the same email chain, albeit with a response or two added. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 10:42 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS)< > Subject: RE: Discovery review project Thanks for this. I will ask our paralegal to check out the damaged documents. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 10:38 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < > Subject: RE: Discovery review project Hi Following up with a quick update, I've got 6 PDF's left to review. Wanted to flag that for some reason 2 of the PDF's (Emails 2_Part4 & Emails 3_Part 2) will not open and I get a "document is damaged" error from Adobe. I've tried logging out of the portal and restarting computer but no luck so far. I'm attaching the current spreadsheet so you can see how I've gone about flagging portions of the PDFs. I've noted a few uncertain areas in the notes where it may be Tartaglione issue but related to Epstein/request to be interviewed or for preservation. Hope this is on the right track! From: (USANYS) Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 2:12 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < > Subject: Discovery review project Hello =, As we discussed, I would like you to review the email files only in the folder listed below. Please identify any pages in the documents that relate solely to (1) the conditions of confinement for Tartaglione or (2) emails with regarding Touhy. You should create a document (spreadsheet maybe) that identifies the name of the PDF file and the pages that fall in each category, so that the paralegals can redact those pages. Here's where you I. find the documents You only need to review the emails, not the other documents in the folder. EFTA00101147 Let me know if you have any questions or issues once you start working on the project. Let's aim for the end of the day on Wednesday. Thanks for your help, Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York Tel: Fax: EFTA00101148

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Jeffrey Epstein

From: To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 20:51:45 +0000 Importance: Normal Mr. Lefkowitz, The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida was recently notified that the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, at your request, intends to review certain aspects of the investigation involving Mr. Epstein's sexual conduct involving minor victims. Naturally, until the DAG's Office has completed its review, this Office has postponed the current June 2, 2008 deadline requiring compliance by your client with the terms and conditions of the September 24, 2007 global resolution of state and federal liabilities, as modified by the United States Attorney's December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Sincerely, EFTA00214435

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: EMail 1 of 2: EPSTEIN -

From: To: Subject: RE: EMail 1 of 2: EPSTEIN - Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:30:42 +0000 Attachments: Exhibit_C_-_June_2020_Warrant.pdf; Exhibit_D _S1_20_Cr._330_(AJN)fflocketed).pdf; Exhibit_ _Application_for_Jtme_2020_Warrant.pdf Inline-Images: image002.jpg signed application/affidavit _- Maxwell Superseding_Indictment_- Al-July_2—019_Warrant.pdf; Exhibit_B_- Received, thank you very much= I noticed that the affidavit does not have the exhibits attached. To make sure they are maintained in the court's file, attached are the four exhibits that we submitted with the affidavit. Thar ..< ou, Assistant United States Attorney Cnothem Mori& of New York New Vnrk NV 10007 From: Sent: hursday, October 29, 2020 11:51 AM To: Cc: Subject: FW: EMail 1 of 2: EPSTEIN Good Morning Your signed Warrants are attached. United States District Court of New York FroH Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 7:18 PM signed application/affidavit EFTA00076701 To Cc: Subject: FW: EMail 1 of

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

11/28/07 WED 09:18 FAX 1 213 680 8500

11/28/07 WED 09:18 FAX 1 213 680 8500 KIRALAND&ELLIS LLP 11002 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND A/MIMED PARINUSHIPS Kenneth W: Start To Call Wrier Directly. (213) 680-8440 kstarrekirklend.com VIA FACSIMILE Honorable Alice S. Fisher Assistant Attorney General Department of Justice Criminal Division 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Room 2107 Washington, DC 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Fisher: 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 680-8400 www.kirkland.com November 28, 2007 Facsimile: (213) 680-8600 I represent Jeffrey Epstein, who, as you may be aware, was the target of a dual investigation by both state and federal authorities in Florida for acts relating to his interactions with numerous young women. As you may also be aware, Mr. Epstein has entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the "Agreement") with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (the "USAO") to resolve its criminal investigation of him

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EXHIBIT M

EXHIBIT M EFTA00039806 From: U Subject: Date: Fwd: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Sunday. February 24, 2019 8:18:01 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Dat • March 3 ?016 at 5:09.55 PM EST To: Subject: RE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Cool. Talk to you then. From: Sent: I hursday, March 03, 20th 5:05 PM To:I 2 Subject: HE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Tuesday at 4 is good. Thanks. From: Sent: hursday, March 03, 2011 10:24 AM To: Subject: HE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Sure. Sounds both intriguing and complicated. I uesday is better for me than Wednesday. How's Tuesday at 4 pm? From: Sent: I hursday. March 03, 201b k:08 AM To: ■ Subject: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Earlier this week Pete Skinner and two other lawyers came in to pitch a sex trafficking case against Jeffrey Epstein, a financier with homes abroad, in FL, and in Manhattan. They represent vho claims to have been prostituted by and f

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Hello

From: To: ' Subject: Hello Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 15:53:09 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi I read you are working on the Epstein case. It seems like an excellent and very important case! I'm glad (and unsurprised) to see you are doing so well up there. Best regards, Anthony Special Assistant United States Attorney Eastern District of Virginia EFTA00083564

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN RE:

IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Non-Prosecution Agreement IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein with one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure expressed in this Agreement; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation of Epstein's background and offenses including; knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to commit an offense against the United States, in violation of Titl

6p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.