PROFFER AGREEMENT
PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of H.R.H. Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward, the Duke of York, also known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor "Client" and his attorney Gar , x Esq., with Assistant United States Attorneys and to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York on ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (1) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) In any prosecution brou
Summary
PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of H.R.H. Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward, the Duke of York, also known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor "Client" and his attorney Gar , x Esq., with Assistant United States Attorneys and to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York on ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (1) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) In any prosecution brou
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
5119122. 3152
5119122. 3152 PM iV; L c ol g or yeR - cioveizN. riccsr nc — C I Ka • inceNT eaDA)E Jeffrey Epstein - Widpedla FRM CC- AOST Epstein a massage" She claims she was taken to his mansion, , Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.a9--6I A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer. -2.1 These and several similar lawsuits were dismis,sed.ing All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court.fml Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.11T-4 aiCE PS/6 — MAXWELL - SC'cUAL i\ k.)3C RINC44 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) C)(4 R L tql3Q•sC at egejt-ttiV POS I C. t\CS A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe i ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims', Rig
EFTA00161219
EFTA00161219 EFTA00161220 EFTA00161221 EFTA00161222 EFTA00161223 EFTA00161224 Epstein Associate Maxwell Charged With Trafficking Minors. The AP (7/2, Musfian) reports that on Thursday in New Hampshire, "British socialite" Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested on charges she helped lure at least three girls — one as young as 14 — to be sexually abused by the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was accused of victimizing dozens of girls and women over many years." According to the indictment, Maxwell "facilitated his crimes and on some occasions joined him in EFTA00161225 sexually abusing the girls." The AP reports that Maxwell "has, for years, been accused by many women of acting as a madam for Epstein, helping him scout young girls for abuse, then hiring them to give him massages, during which the girls were pressured into sex acts." CNBC (7/2, Mangan, 3.62M) says on its website that Maxwell's arrest "following a six-count criminal indictment issued Monday in Manhattan federal
AMC-RICA - AUSTRALIA
AMC-RICA - AUSTRALIA 5/19r22. 3:52 PM Pk% CO; - CO \ZAN 1.1C-Ni P 0.C57 - 'N ARV) Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himcelf and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward. lob A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a dif₹erent woman, who was represented by the same lawier.Q.91These and several similar lawsuits were clismissed.a321 All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of comt.1-1311 Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.[491 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) 564) L. tqek:SC at PZ:e. pReA-01.)e•ii PrcissincisL4 A December 3o, 2O14, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe l) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S.. Department Of Justice's NpA with Ante; Ti and his li
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 016696-Royal-Hammon
November 12, 2025 release of Jeffrey Epstein documents by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets converted to PDF. Originals in NATIVES/001 folder
Ces2e.29-12,407413r3cliAlienDtidutinEl t310282 if663615/233/2174ig Plage aoat 9
Ces2e.29-12,407413r3cliAlienDtidutinEl t310282 if663615/233/2174ig Plage aoat 9 HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN July 29, 2020 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P C Ty Gee 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 HI 303.832.2628 www.hmllaw.com [email protected] Re: Reconsideration of the Court's July 23 Ruling Giuffie v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Dear Judge Preska: As counsel for Ms. Maxwell we write to request that the Court vindicate its Protective Order and punish its violation. Ms. Maxwell's two deposition transcripts were designated "Confidential" and subject to the protection of the Protective Order. Both transcripts ended up in the hands of the government, which used them to bring an indictment against Ms. Maxwell, charging her with, among other things, perjury in her deposition testimony. This is a serious violation
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 016696-Palm-Beach
November 12, 2025 release of Jeffrey Epstein documents by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets converted to PDF. Originals in NATIVES/001 folder
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.