Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00101307DOJ Data Set 9Other

PROFFER AGREEMENT

PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of H.R.H. Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward, the Duke of York, also known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor "Client" and his attorney Gar , x Esq., with Assistant United States Attorneys and to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York on ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (1) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) In any prosecution brou

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00101307
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of H.R.H. Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward, the Duke of York, also known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor "Client" and his attorney Gar , x Esq., with Assistant United States Attorneys and to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York on ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (1) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) In any prosecution brou

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of H.R.H. Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward, the Duke of York, also known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor "Client" and his attorney Gar , x Esq., with Assistant United States Attorneys and to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York on ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (1) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) In any prosecution brought against Client by this Office, except as provided below the Government will not offer in evidence on its case-in-chief, or in connection with any sentencing proceeding for the purpose of determining an appropriate sentence, any statements made by Client at the meeting, except (a) in a prosecution for false statements, obstruction of justice or perjury with respect to any acts committed or statements made during or after the meeting or testimony given after the meeting; or (b) if, at any time following the meeting, Client becomes a fugitive from justice. (3) Notwithstanding item (2) above: (a) the Government may use information derived directly or indirectly from the meeting for the purpose of obtaining leads to other evidence, which evidence may be used in any prosecution of Client by the Government; (b) in any prosecution brought against Client, the Government may use statements made by Client at the meeting and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom for the purpose of cross-examination should Client testify; and (c) the Government may also use statements made by Client at the meeting to rebut any evidence or arguments offered by or on behalf of Client (including arguments made or issues raised sua sponte by the District Court) at any stage of the criminal prosecution (including bail, all phases of trial, and sentencing) in any prosecution brought against Client. (4) The Client understands and agrees that in the event the Client seeks to qualify for a reduction in sentence under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3553(f), United States Sentencing Guidelines, Sections 2D1.1(b)(18) or 5C1.2, or Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b), the Office may offer or use at any stage of the criminal proceeding any statement made by Client during the meeting, and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom, to the extent such use is consistent with Section 402 of the First Step Act of 2018. (5) To the extent that the Government is entitled under this Agreement to offer in evidence any statements made by Client or leads obtained therefrom, Client shall assert no claim under the United States Constitution, any statute, Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, or any other 01.14.2019 EFTA00101307 federal rule that such statements or any leads therefrom should be suppressed. It is the intent of this Agreement to waive all rights in the foregoing respects. (6) If this Office receives a request from another prosecutor's office for access to information obtained pursuant to this Proffer Agreement, this Office may furnish such information but will do so only on the condition that the requesting office honor the provisions of this Agreement. (7) It is further understood that this Agreement is limited to the statements made by Client at the meeting and does not apply to any oral, written or recorded statements made by Client at any other time. No understandings, promises, agreements and/or conditions have been entered into with respect to the meeting other than those set forth in this Agreement and none will be entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties. (8) The understandings set forth in paragraphs 1 through 7 above extend to the continuation of this meeting on the dates that appear below. (9) Client and Attorney acknowledge that they have fully discussed and understand every paragraph and clause in this Agreement and the consequences thereof. Dated: New York, New York AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York by: Client Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Client Witness Dates of Continuation Initials of counsel, Client, Al:SA, witness 01.14.2019 EFTA00101308

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

5119122. 3152

5119122. 3152 PM iV; L c ol g or yeR - cioveizN. riccsr nc — C I Ka • inceNT eaDA)E Jeffrey Epstein - Widpedla FRM CC- AOST Epstein a massage" She claims she was taken to his mansion, , Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.a9--6I A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer. -2.1 These and several similar lawsuits were dismis,sed.ing All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court.fml Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.11T-4 aiCE PS/6 — MAXWELL - SC'cUAL i\ k.)3C RINC44 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) C)(4 R L tql3Q•sC at egejt-ttiV POS I C. t\CS A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe i ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims', Rig

70p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EFTA00161219

EFTA00161219 EFTA00161220 EFTA00161221 EFTA00161222 EFTA00161223 EFTA00161224 Epstein Associate Maxwell Charged With Trafficking Minors. The AP (7/2, Musfian) reports that on Thursday in New Hampshire, "British socialite" Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested on charges she helped lure at least three girls — one as young as 14 — to be sexually abused by the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was accused of victimizing dozens of girls and women over many years." According to the indictment, Maxwell "facilitated his crimes and on some occasions joined him in EFTA00161225 sexually abusing the girls." The AP reports that Maxwell "has, for years, been accused by many women of acting as a madam for Epstein, helping him scout young girls for abuse, then hiring them to give him massages, during which the girls were pressured into sex acts." CNBC (7/2, Mangan, 3.62M) says on its website that Maxwell's arrest "following a six-count criminal indictment issued Monday in Manhattan federal

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

AMC-RICA - AUSTRALIA

AMC-RICA - AUSTRALIA 5/19r22. 3:52 PM Pk% CO; - CO \ZAN 1.1C-Ni P 0.C57 - 'N ARV) Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himcelf and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward. lob A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a dif₹erent woman, who was represented by the same lawier.Q.91These and several similar lawsuits were clismissed.a321 All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of comt.1-1311 Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.[491 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) 564) L. tqek:SC at PZ:e. pReA-01.)e•ii PrcissincisL4 A December 3o, 2O14, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe l) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S.. Department Of Justice's NpA with Ante; Ti and his li

51p
Court UnsealedNov 19, 2025

HOUSE OVERSIGHT 016696-Royal-Hammon

November 12, 2025 release of Jeffrey Epstein documents by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets converted to PDF. Originals in NATIVES/001 folder

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Ces2e.29-12,407413r3cliAlienDtidutinEl t310282 if663615/233/2174ig Plage aoat 9

Ces2e.29-12,407413r3cliAlienDtidutinEl t310282 if663615/233/2174ig Plage aoat 9 HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN July 29, 2020 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P C Ty Gee 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 HI 303.832.2628 www.hmllaw.com [email protected] Re: Reconsideration of the Court's July 23 Ruling Giuffie v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Dear Judge Preska: As counsel for Ms. Maxwell we write to request that the Court vindicate its Protective Order and punish its violation. Ms. Maxwell's two deposition transcripts were designated "Confidential" and subject to the protection of the Protective Order. Both transcripts ended up in the hands of the government, which used them to bring an indictment against Ms. Maxwell, charging her with, among other things, perjury in her deposition testimony. This is a serious violation

209p
Dept. of JusticeNov 19, 2025

HOUSE OVERSIGHT 016696-Palm-Beach

November 12, 2025 release of Jeffrey Epstein documents by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets converted to PDF. Originals in NATIVES/001 folder

139p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.