Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00102175DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: FW: Attorneys

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00102175
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To: Cc: Subject: FW: Attorneys Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 20:57:53 +0000 Inline-Images: image00 1 jpg; image003.jpg IP The DOJ OIG agents who have been working on the MCC guard case with us are currently working on their report concerning Epstein. They have the below question about the names of Epstein's attorneys. Could you send the names of all of Epstein's attorneys to us and we will pass them along to the OIG agents? Thanks so much! From: Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 20214:51 PM To: Subject: Attorneys Good Evening We are trying to identify the attorneys who represented Jeffrey Epstein and visited him in prison. The MCC attorney log is either illegible or the attorneys listed just one name. The names I could read were "Colon" and "G. Tali". Can you please help us identify them? Thank you. Special Agent U.S. Department of Justice • Office of the Inspector General • New York Field Office One Battery Park Plaza, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10004 Cell: EFTA00102175

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Cc: Subject: FW: Attorneys Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 20:57:53 +0000 Inline-Images: image00 1 jpg; image003.jpg IP The DOJ OIG agents who have been working on the MCC guard case with us are currently working on their report concerning Epstein. They have the below question about the names of Epstein's attorneys. Could you send the names of all of Epstein's attorneys to us and we will pass them along to the OIG agents? Thanks so much! From: Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 20214:51 PM To: Subject: Attorneys Good Evening We are trying to identify the attorneys who represented Jeffrey Epstein and visited him in prison. The MCC attorney log is either illegible or the attorneys listed just one name. The names I could read were "Colon" and "G. Tali". Can you please help us identify them? Thank you. Special Agent U.S. Department of Justice • Office of the Inspector General • New York Field Office One Battery Park Plaza, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10004 Cell: EFTA00102175

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014046

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02335898

51p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.