(USANYS)"
Summary
From: (USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' llitiliYS)" , ti lail YNASJ. S" Subject: Re: More Tartaglione Requests Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 21:55:43 +0000 Great, thanks. Co-Chief, Narcotics Unit On Dec 17, 2019, at 16:55, (USANYS) < wrote: SA at FBI. I'll connect you guys by email. On Dec 17, 2019, at 4:52 PM, (USANYS) > wrote: Apparently on July 25, Tartaglione's attorney's asked to preserve the footage and he confirmed he put in the request. Do you remember who told you that the video was not available? Co-Chief, Narcotics Unit On Dec 17, 2019, at 15:35, (USANYS) < wrote: What we were told is that when they requested video of the SHU, they didn't have that day because it had already been written over. There isn't a technical 30-day retention period for video as far as I'm aware, so it's accurate to say that it wasn't retained at the time we requested the video on 8/10. From: (USANYS)< > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 3:32 PM To: (USANYS) < Cc: Subject: R
Persons Referenced (4)
“...y Guys — We have a conference tomorrow, so naturally we have more requests from defense counsel (I've noted our thinking on each item where appropriate). They are: 1— Is the...”
United States“...iews]. Thanks guys, and sorry for all the requests. Co-Chief, Narcotics Unit United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York New York, New York 10007 Tel...”
The Witness“...was, and if so, I would review it for potential Brody along the same lines as the witness interviews]. Thanks guys, and sorry for all the requests. Co-Chief, Narcotics...”
United States Attorney“...iews]. Thanks guys, and sorry for all the requests. Co-Chief, Narcotics Unit United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York New York, New York 10007 Tel: EFTA00...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United States Attorney's Office in Miami (the "USAO"), not only has it has remained unwilling to address these issues, but Mr. Epstein's defense counsel has been instructed to limit its contact to the very prosecutors who are the subject of this misconduct complaint. For your review, this document summarizes the USAO's conduct in this case. Background 1. In March 2005, the Palm Beach Police Department opened a criminal investigation of Palm Beach resident, Jeffrey E. Epstein. The press has widely reported that Mr. Epstein is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton. 2. In July 2006, after an intensive probe, including interviews of dozens of witnesses, re
09/24/2007
09/24/2007 01:27 PM To "Jay Lefkowitz" <[email protected]> cc 'Martin Weinberg' <owlm otidnet. . bee Subject RE: Epstein agreement as reviewed by the U.S. Attorney Hi Jay — Sorry for the delay. The U.S. Attorney had a last-minute concern, that I think I fixed (it is in the first "It Appearing" clause following the list of statutes potentially violated). After you get the green light, let's discuss the potential representative. The person I am thinking of has run a preliminary conflicts check and it looks alright. Also, to address Mr. Epstein's concern regarding the list of names, I wanted to tell you that I have compiled a list of 34 confirmed minors. There are six others, whose names we already have, who need to be interviewed by the FBI to confirm whether they were 17 or 18 at the time of their activity with Mr. Epstein. Once those interviews are completed, I can finalize the list of identified victims, which I will put in a formal document that I will mainta
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 22 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 22 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, No. 20-CV-833(PAE) v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. DECLARATION OF RUSSELL CAPONE I, Russell Capone, hereby declare as follows: I. I am Counsel to the Acting United States Attorney in the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York ("USAO-SDNY"). I have served in this capacity since June 2020. Prior to my current role, I served as Deputy Chief and then Chief of the Public Corruption Unit in the USAO-SDNY from July 2017 and as an Assistant United States Attorney from January 2011. I supervised the Noel prosecution directly in my prior role as Chief of the Public Corruption Unit, and I play a supervisory role over both the Noel and Tartaglione prosecutions in my current role as Counsel to the Acting United States Attorney. 2. I am familiar with the Freedom of Information Act r
Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74
Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,
05/16/2008 11:16 FAX
05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/16/08 FRI 11:08 FAX UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ram Criminal Division Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section NW ; ppm .: as gton, DC 205M-0(1001 TO: Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. OFFICE NUMBER: CEOS: FAX: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. FAX NUMBER: FROM: Alexandra Gelber DATE/TIME: May 16, 2008 OFFICE NUMBER: NUMBER OF PAGES, EXCLUDING THIS SHEET: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: EFTA00214480 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/16/08 FRI 11:08 FAX ql) 002 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division hief Child &Nedra:tun end Oknewthy Saellon May 15, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP New York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation of/eery Epstein Dear Mr. Leflcowitz: Pursuant to your request and the request of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, we have independently evaluated certain issues raised in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein to determine whether a decision to prosecute Mr. Epstein for federal criminal violations would contradict crim
U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 2053U June 23, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kenneth Starr, Esq. Kirkland and Ellis LLP Gentlemen: This Office has completed a thorough review of the U.S. Attorney's handling of the matter involving your client, Jeffrey Epstein. We have received and reviewed your letters of May 19, June 3 and June 19, 2008, the attachments to the June 19 letter, as well as your submissions to the Criminal Division and the U.S. Attorney's Office. Additionally, we have reviewed an extensive set of materials provided by the U.S. Attorney's Office and conferred with a number of highly experienced Department attorneys about this matter. The Deputy Attorney General has also been briefed. As you know, the Department of Justice vests considerable discretion in its U.S. Attorneys, and the Deputy Attorney General will intervene in only the most unusual of circumstances. We do not believe such intervention is warranted here. Even if we were to substitute our
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.