Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00104410DOJ Data Set 9

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

Other

COHEN & GRESSER LLP Christian R. May 28, 2021 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: 800 Third Avenue New Yak NY 10022 swess r .c resiterom On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, we will be filing our Omnibus Reply Memorandum in Support of Ms. Maxwell's Supplemental Pretrial Motions Relating to the S2 Superseding Indictment. The reply memorandum contains Confidential Information produced in discovery that is governed by paragraph 15 of the Protective Order (Dkt. 36). Accordingly, pursuant to our prior practice, we will not file the reply memorandum on the public docket until we are instructed to do so by the Court. Instead, we will submit the reply memorandum by email to the Court and the government under seal-pursuant to Rule 2(B) of the Court's individual rules of criminal practice-to

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00104410
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.