From: "El=,
Summary
From: "El=, (OPR)" To: '9 Cc: 'I r > Subject: RE: OPR Matter (following up on our recent conversation) Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 12:44:55 +0000 We will certainly do so, in all respects. Thank you. And best wishes to you all for safety and health. Regards, From: Sent: Monday, April 06, 2020 11:00 PM To: (OPR) Cc: Subject: RE: OPR Matter (following up on our recent conversation) We're glad that information is helpful, and we appreciate you checking in with us on this —thank you. We do not believe that asking victims about their past contacts with the USAO-SDFL and FBI-MIA in or about 2005-2008 would present any issues for our office, we would just respectfully ask that any such discussions avoid addressing the substance of the underlying criminal scheme (including the victims' personal experiences and interactions with Epstein or his associates). And if those topics unavoidably arise despite not having been raised by OPR, we'd ask that you please let us know so we
Persons Referenced (5)
“...represented by Brad Edwards, of Edwards Pottinger LLC; two are represented by Jack Scarola, of Searcy Law; one is represented by Sigrid McCawley, of Boies Schiller; one i...”
Bradley EdwardsSigrid McCawley“...LLC; two are represented by Jack Scarola, of Searcy Law; one is represented by Sigrid McCawley, of Boies Schiller; one is represented by Rita Glavin, of Seward & Kissel LLP,...”
The victim“...ns avoid addressing the substance of the underlying criminal scheme (including the victims' personal experiences and interactions with Epstein or his associates). And if those topics unavoidably ari...”
U.S. Attorney“...se let us know if that poses any issues on your end. thanks again, Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York From: (OPR) < M> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2020...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded
S.J. QUINNEY
Ul S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW TI IC UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Metropolitan Police Service New Scotland Yard 8-10 Broadway London SW1H 0BG United Kingdom PAUL G. CASSELL Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law May 4, 2015 Re: International Sex Trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell Dear Metropolitan Police: I write on behalf of my client — . She is the victim of an international sex trafficking crime in London shortly before March 13, 2001. In the following weeks (and much earlier), the crimes also continued into the United States, specifically New York City, New York, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The perpetrators of these crimes include: (1) Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire (and convicted sex offender) who is a citizen of the United States residing in New York City; (2) Ghislaine Maxwell, a well-to-do citizen of the United Kingdom who moved to the United States after the death of her father, Robert Maxwell; and (3) others known and unknown.
Exhibit E
Exhibit E EFTA00095721 DOCUMENTS RELATED TO DEFENSE MOTIONS I. All written and oral communications concerning the negotiations relating to the Non- Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") signed by Jeffrey Epstein on September 24, 2007. Such communications include: a. All communications between the government — including, but not limited to, attorneys and staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, the United States Attorney's Office for Southern District of New York, the Department of Justice, state prosecutor's offices, the FBI, and any other federal and state investigative agencies — and Mr. Epstein's attorneys. b. All communications between and among any government employees including, but not limited to, attorneys and staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, the United States Attorney's Office for Southern District of New York, the Department of Justice, state prosecutor's offices, the FBI, and any other federal an
LAW FIRM
MARSH LAW FIRM JENNIFER FREEMAN, ESQ New York, New York 10001 May 2, 2023 The Honorable Christopher Wray Director Federal Bureau of Investigation Michael E. Horowitz Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20535 Washington, D.C. 20530 The Honorable Merrick B. Garland Attorney General U.S. De artment of ustice NW Washington, D.C. 20530 Via Email and US. Mail Dear Director Wray, Inspector General Horowitz, and Attorney General Garland: As counsel to many survivors of the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking conspiracy, we write regarding the failure of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to properly, adequately, or timely investigate the sex trafficking of hundreds of girls and young women. The FBI utterly failed to investigate serious allegations involving Epstein's, and perhaps others, child sex abuse materials (CSAM), significant additional criminality which, until recently, has been disregarded, disrespected, and essentially denied.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 290 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2015 Page 1 of 14
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 290 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2015 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE #3 AND JANE DOE #4'S CORRECTED MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 21 FOR JOINDER IN ACTION Respondent United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4's Corrected Motion pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action (D.E. 280), and states: I. PETITIONERS' MOTION TO ADD TWO ADDITIONAL PARTIES SHOULD BE DENIED AS UNTIMELY This action was commenced by Jane Doe #1 on July 7, 2008 (D.E. I). The Court ordered the Government to file a response by July 9, 2008, which was done. On July 11, 2008, the Court held a hearing on the emergency petition. At that hearing, Jane Doe #2 was added to the petition. Now, over six years into the litigation, petitio
Virginia Giuffre Deposition May 2016
Case Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 89 EXHIBIT Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 2 of 89 GIUFFRE VS. MAXWELL Deposition VIRGINIA GIUFFRE 05/03/2016 _______________________________________________________________________ Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. 216 16th Street, Suite 600 Denver Colorado, 80202 303-296-0017 Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. Page 3 of 89 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 IN THE UNI
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.