Subject: RE: PRESS INQUIRY
Summary
From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: PRESS INQUIRY Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 20:41:11 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.jpg; image002.jpg • Thanks. We had submitted a letter brief on the docket arguing about why he did, but that was before he filed his letter. From: Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 4:35 PM To: Cc Subject: FW: PRESS INQUIRY FYI. We declined to comment. From: Mary Margaret Olohan Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 4:27 PM To: Subject: PRESS INQUIRY Good afternoon, icl > Can SDNY comment on David Markus's assertion that he did not violate SDNY's rules when he wrote an op-ed comparing Bill Cosby and Ghislaine Maxwell? Thanks so much -- Mary Margaret Mary Margaret Olohan Social Issues Reporter Daily Caller News Foundation EFTA00105338
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 429
The defense attorney argues that Ghislaine Maxwell should be released from pretrial detention as she is not a flight risk, has been detained for an extended period, and faces challenging conditions that impede her ability to prepare for trial. The letter highlights new evidence that undermines the government's case and compares Maxwell's treatment unfavorably to other defendants like Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby.
MARKUS / MOSS
MARKUS / MOSS July 9, 2021 VIA EMAIL TO CHAMBERS The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Even though I do not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any proceedings and have never entered an appearance in connection with her trial before Your Honor, the Government submitted a letter "to bring to the Court's attention" an article that I wrote on June 30, 2021, and asked that the Court "issue an order pursuant to Local Rule 23.1(h)" directed at me. (Dkt. No. 309). This Court ordered that I respond (Dkt. No. 312), and I do so here. I respectfully request that the Court deny the Government's request for the following reasons: I. The local rules do not apply as I do not currently represent Ghislaine Maxwell in any proceeding and have not entered an appearance in this Court. Because undersigned counsel does not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any co
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER RENEWED MOTION FOR BAIL Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim New York, NY 10011 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00094289 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 ARGUMENT 7 I. Reconsideration of the Court's Bail Decision is Appropriate Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(O 7 II. Ms. Maxwell Should Be Granted Bail Under the Proposed Strict Bail Conditions 10 A. Ms. Maxwell Has Deep Family Ties to the United States and Numerous Sureties to Support Her Bond 10 1. Ms. Maxwell is Devoted to Her Spouse and Stepchildren and Would Never Destroy Her Family By Leaving th
SDNY News Clips, Thursday, January 30, 2020
SDNY News Clips, Thursday, January 30, 2020 SDNY News Clips Thursday, January 30, 2020 Contents Public Corruption 2 Avenatti 2 Epstein 4 Pamas 8 Terrorism and International Narcotics 9 Virgil Griffith 9 White Plains 10 Grogg 10 Matters of Interest 11 Weinstein 11 Bolton 14 1 EFTA00095967 SDNY News Clips, Thursday, January 30, 2020 Public Corruption Avenatti Avenatti didn't care about ruining teens' lives in Nike case, lawyer says NY Post By Ruth Weissmann 1/30/2020 Lightning-rod lawyer Michael Avenatti was allegedly so hellbent on extorting an eight-figure sum from Nike that he didn't care who got hurt — including teenage basketball players, a witness testified Thursday. In his second day of testimony in Manhattan federal court, Nike attorney Scott Wilson recounted the "Twilight Zone" meetings in which Avenatti allegedly tried to extort the company for $20 million under threat of exposing purported corruption in youth basketball linked to the athl
EFTA Document EFTA01682001
Subject: SDNY News Clips, Thursday, January 30, 2020
From: To: Cc: Subject: SDNY News Clips, Thursday, January 30, 2020 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 22:36:04 +0000 Attachments: 0I -30-2020.pdf SDNY News Clips Thursday, January 30, 2020 EFTA00095957 Contents Public Corruption Avenatti Epstein Parnas Terrorism and International Narcotics Virgil Griffith White Plains Grogg Matters of Interest Weinstein Bolton Public Corruption Avenatti Avenatti didn't care about ruining teens' lives in Nike case, lawyer says NY Post By Ruth Weissmann 1/30/2020 Lightning-rod lawyer Michael Avenatti was allegedly so hellbent on extorting an eight-figure sum from Nike that he didn't care who got hurt — including teenage basketball players, a witness testified Thursday. In his second day of testimony in Manhattan federal court, Nike attorney Scott Wilson recounted the "Twilight Zone" meetings in which Avenatti allegedly tried to extort the company for $20 million under threat of exposing purported corruption in youth basketball linked t
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.