Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00105536DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USANYS)"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00105536
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: (USANYS)" To: (CRM)" Subject: FW: DOJ ongoing Investigation. Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:28:15 +0000 Inline-Images: image543915.jpg; image517195.jpg =I— See below. From: Gary Bloxsome Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 12:00 To: Cundy Jennifer Richardson < Subject: DOJ ongoing Investigation. Dee_ .ic >; Daniel We and the Duke of York set out to assist your investigation when the DOJ asked for his help in January 2020. However, we regret to say that we have reached the conclusion that the DOJ's dealings with the Duke of York have not been designed to seek his assistance in investigating and prosecuting the targets of the investigation but instead have been used only to gather publicity for Mr Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. It is essential, if justice is to be done for Epstein's victims, that a proper and thorough criminal investigation is carried out. Although the public record indicates your office (SDNY) h

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: (USANYS)" To: (CRM)" Subject: FW: DOJ ongoing Investigation. Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:28:15 +0000 Inline-Images: image543915.jpg; image517195.jpg =I— See below. From: Gary Bloxsome Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 12:00 To: Cundy Jennifer Richardson < Subject: DOJ ongoing Investigation. Dee_ .ic >; Daniel We and the Duke of York set out to assist your investigation when the DOJ asked for his help in January 2020. However, we regret to say that we have reached the conclusion that the DOJ's dealings with the Duke of York have not been designed to seek his assistance in investigating and prosecuting the targets of the investigation but instead have been used only to gather publicity for Mr Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. It is essential, if justice is to be done for Epstein's victims, that a proper and thorough criminal investigation is carried out. Although the public record indicates your office (SDNY) has been actively investigating Mr. Epstein and other targets for more than 2 years, the first time you ever attempted to make contact and request The Duke of York's help was on 2 January 2020. The Duke instructed my firm to make contact with you pertaining to this request. When we made contact, you confirmed that the Duke of York was not and is not a target of the US criminal investigation. Due to the publicity surrounding the investigation, we asked you to confirm that our discussions and any interview arrangements would remain confidential, in accordance with your rules. The Duke did not want to add to the media circus that has now surrounded the investigation. On 10 January 2020 you confirmed that any arrangements would indeed be kept confidential. We indicated that we would refer back to you once we had dealt with the various issues and procedures, which would need to be addressed to enable the Duke to cooperate to the fullest extent possible, including the need to obtain all the information that you might need to consider. It was at that time that we informed you, by email dated 20 January, that such preliminary issues would be dealt with within 14 days. It was also in that email that we confirmed that The Duke has a strong desire to cooperate with the ongoing investigation by the DOJ. EFTA00105536 Instead of waiting to hear from us (as you indicated on 22 January 2020), Mr Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, chose to make a public statement about the Duke on 27 January 2020. This led to press reports that there had been "a wall of silence" and that there had been "zero co- operation" by the Duke. These statements were not true. They should not have been made. Quite apart from your promise of confidentiality, in England it would not be thought to be in the interests of justice for any prosecutor or investigator to make public statements about witnesses who may be willing, in confidence, to assist their investigation. In England, prosecutors and investigators try to make sure that the investigation and trial of serious criminal cases take place in court and not in press conferences or publicity battles. When we complained about the way the Duke (and we) had been treated by the DOJ, you refused to apologise and you have now also gone back on your promise that any arrangements for the interview will be confidential. We cannot advise the Duke to speak to prosecutors who cannot be trusted to deal with him fairly nor to treat what he says or does confidentially. He has reluctantly accepted our advice that, in those circumstances, there is no purpose to be served in continuing to try to assist further. Finally we have no wish to engage in any further publicity battle about the DOJ's conduct and for that reason we ask that you treat this email as private and confidential. Regards Gary Gary Bloxsome I Partner RANKED IN • Chambers j Blackfords LLP 115 Old Bailey I London I EC4M 7EF gh UK ,e DX 161400 Old Bailey 5 I 020 3427 3343 I www.blackfords.com lair s 2020 or Louth* Finn LE I .500 Blackfords RP is a limited liability partnership registered in England & Wales with registered number OC325398 at Hill House, 1 Mint Walk, Croydon, CR0 1EA. A list of members names is available at this address. GDPR: details of how we handle personal data can be found in our Privacy Statement Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 462078. EFTA00105537

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FD-302 (Rev. 5-14-10)

FD-302 (Rev. 5-14-10) -1 of 6 - FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION OFFICIAL RECORD Datcofentry 02/05/202' , date of birth was interviewed over video conference. Present on the video call was attorney Also present on the call was Assistant United States Attorneys III, and IIII along with Detective and Special Agent After being advised of the identity of the above listed individuals and the nature of the interview, provided the following information: grew up in South Florida, where he attended some college. At the time of this interview, worked as a telemarketer and lived in Florida. met JEFFREY EPSTEIN once. went with his girlfriend at the time, , to EPSTEIN's home in Palm Beach. thought this may have been around 2002 when he was a senior in high school. EPSTEIN pulled up to the house in a convertible. recalled EPSTEIN put the hood down. described EPSTEIN as "flashy". and shared a phone. would answer the call sometimes when EPSTEIN and called. met in ap

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

32p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein Child Sex Trafficking Investigation – FBI Records, Deleted Pages, Non‑Prosecution Deal, High‑Profile Connections

The compiled documents reveal a dense web of FBI case files, internal forms, and communications that reference Jeffrey Epstein’s illegal sexual activities with minors, a secret non‑prosecution agreeme FBI case number 31E‑MM‑108062 repeatedly references ‘Child Locate’ entries and deleted pages (b6, b7 Multiple internal FD‑515 forms list Jeffrey Epstein as a subject (named explicitly on 09/30/2008 e

181p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "

From: " (USANYS)" To: "M ilaili7)"r usANysy. (USANYS)" Subject: FW: EXTREMELY URGENT: NEW SUBMISSIONS & FORMAL COMPLAINTS; TO Dr Nikola Stepanov (PhD) Queensland Integrity Commissioner & The Hon Ronald Sackville AO QC, The Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability. -... Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:12:40 +0000 Importance: Normal Inlinc-Images: image003.jpg From: Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 10:29 PM L k Subject: Fwd: EXTREMELY URGENT: NEW SUBMISSIONS & FORMAL COMPLAINTS; TO Dr Nikola Stepanov (PhD) Queensland Integrity Commissioner & The Hon Ronald Sackville AO QC, The Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability. -... United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) HIGHLY URGENT: To Geoffrey S. Berman; The United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York & Victim/Witness Coordinator at The United States Attorney's Office. Here are my; Additional Submiccione (Which

4p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.