Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00105876DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USANYS)"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00105876
Pages
3
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: (USANYS)" To: (USANYS)" Cc: 'M(USiis1YS IMI >AIMMIrANYS)" (USANYS)" Subject: RE: MTD Opposition Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 15:03:19 +0000 Buried in a much longer (and interesting) piece about Epstein, is the following which may be of interest for (particularly since David Boies is involved): https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/30/businessidavid-boies-pottinger-jeffrey-epstein-videos.html? action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage Mr. Pottinger obliged — and walked into what looked like a trap. He described two hypotheticals, both of which were consistent with what had been discussed with The Times at the Harvard Club. In one, which he called a "standard model" for legal settlements, Mr. Pottinger said the money would be split among his clients, the Astria Foundation, Kessler and the lawyers, who would get up to 40 percent. In the second hypothetical, Mr. Pottinger wrote, the lawyers would approach the videotaped men. The men would then hire the lawyers, ensur

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: (USANYS)" To: (USANYS)" Cc: 'M(USiis1YS IMI >AIMMIrANYS)" (USANYS)" Subject: RE: MTD Opposition Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 15:03:19 +0000 Buried in a much longer (and interesting) piece about Epstein, is the following which may be of interest for (particularly since David Boies is involved): https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/30/businessidavid-boies-pottinger-jeffrey-epstein-videos.html? action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage Mr. Pottinger obliged — and walked into what looked like a trap. He described two hypotheticals, both of which were consistent with what had been discussed with The Times at the Harvard Club. In one, which he called a "standard model" for legal settlements, Mr. Pottinger said the money would be split among his clients, the Astria Foundation, Kessler and the lawyers, who would get up to 40 percent. In the second hypothetical, Mr. Pottinger wrote, the lawyers would approach the videotaped men. The men would then hire the lawyers, ensuring that they would not get sued, and "make a contribution to a nonprofit as part of the retainer." "No client is actually involved in this structure," Mr. Pottinger said, noting that the arrangement would have to be "consistent with and subject to rules of ethics." "Thank you very much," Kessler responded. Mr. Pottinger later said that the scenario would have involved him representing a victim, settling a case and then representing the victim's alleged abuser. He said it was within legal boundaries. (He also said he had meant to type "No client lawsuit is actually involved.") EFTA00105876 Such legal arrangements are not unheard-of. Lawyers representing a former Fox News producer who had accused Bill O'Reilly of sexual harassment reached a settlement in which her lawyers agreed to work for Mr. O'Reilly after the dispute. But legal experts generally consider such setups to be unethical because they can create conflicts between the interests of the lawyers and their original clients. From: (USANYS) Sent: Friday, November 29, 2019 9:21 PM To: (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) .< >; (USANYS) (USANYS) < Subject: Re: MID Opposition > Unfortunately, I have a proffer then. Can you do 3:30pm? and I are all available then. On Nov 29, 2019, at 8:43 PM, (USANYS) < wrote: Let's do 11 if that works for everyone. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 29, 2019, at 8:37 PM, (USANYS) < > wrote: Same. On Nov 29, 2019, at 5:44 PM, (USANYS) wrote: I could do those windows. On Nov 29, 2019, at 5:22 PM, (USANYS) < > wrote: Monday between 11 and 2 or 3-5 is good. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 29, 2019, at 4:21 PM, (USANYS) < > wrote: Please let us know if you some availability on Monday for a brief meeting about in advance of some additional discussions we need to have with this coming week. EFTA00105877 Thanks, From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 12:08 PM To: (USANYS) < >; (USANYS) < > Cc: (USANYS) < ; (USANYS) < > Subject: RE: MTD Opposition From: (USANYS) < Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 12:02 PM To: (USANYS) c > (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < (USANYS) Subject: RE: MTD Opposition Well done, team. Light edits attached. How are the preps/interviews going out there? From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 2:41 PM To: (USANYS) < (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) cz .; (USANYS) Subject: MTD Opposition Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 EFTA00105878

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 20:15:42 +0000 ... so you're saying I have to go? From: Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 4:09 PM To: Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Nope, we should all be able to attend. From: Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 4:00 PM To: (AJN) Do you think there's going to be a problem if it's all four of us? From: Nathan NYSD Chambers Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 3:58 PM To: Cc: Subject: Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) >; (USANYS) :, (USANYS) Thank you, counsel. Can you confirm how many attorneys for the government will be in attendance? Best, Juan Ruiz Toro Law Clerk to the Hon. Alison J. Nathan From: Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 3:13 PM To: Nathan NYSD Chambers Cc: Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) CAUTION - EXTERNAL: Dear Judge Nathan, (USANYS) The Government writes in response to the Court's April 19, 2021 scheduling Order, which directed the G

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Strauss, Audrey (USANYS)"

From: "Strauss, Audrey (USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Subject: RE: NYLJ Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:36:28 +0000 Yes, saw that. thanks From: (USANYS) < Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 11:19 AM To: Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: FW: NYU ; Strauss, Audrey (USANYS) The Epstein estate's filing seeking permission to hire Ken Feinberg has started to draw press attention. From (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 11:08 AM To: ilUSANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] Subject: RE: NYU Also, NYT reporting on a possible victims fund: Jeffrey Epstein's Estate May Set Up a Program to Pay Accusers A proposal for a "claims resolution program" was referred to in a court filing by a lawyer for a woman who accused the financier of sexual abuse. Not all the plaintiffs' lawyers are on board. By Matthew Goldstein Nov. 13, 2019 Lawyers for Jeffrey Epstein's estate are considering setting up a program to resolve claims filed by women who say they were a

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP Christian R. Evercle11 +1 (212) 957-7600 ccvcrdclIgathcngresscr.com October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL. , Esq. Esq. Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear 000 Thud Avenue New Yoek. NY 10022 +1 212 957 7600 phone owswoohensresser corn We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of

8p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

mid Avenue

mid Avenue COHEN & GRESSER LLP October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL , Esq. Esq. Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of October 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

COHEN & GRESSER LLP .,:m.cohengesser <cm October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL United States Attorney's Office w York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of October 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil case proceed

8p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.