Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00106011DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USANYS)" alMME>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00106011
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: (USANYS)" alMME> To: (USANYS)" <MIMMIN> Subject: RE: Epstein catch up Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 20:37:02 +0000 I'm looking at the MCC release, by the way. Will circulate shortly. Ori inal Messa e From: (USANYS) <MIMMIE> Sent: Sunda , November 17, 2019 3:22 PM To: (USANYS) alMIE> Subject: FW: Epstein catch up I am surprised to hear, without prior consultation, that they have asked to come in. 't: IMIM> Ori inal Messa e From: Sent: Sunda , November 17, 2019 1:00 PM To: (USANYS Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Re: Epstein catch up Sure, happy to catch up — we tried to stop by a couple times on Friday but missed you, so can set a time for this week. Unfortunately we have conflicts tomorrow from 5:30 on — we could potentially do Wednesday but will be in White Plains so would have to call in, or if there are available times on Tuesday we could try for that. Just as backdrop, the meeting in California did not add any significant information except that we almost certain

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: (USANYS)" alMME> To: (USANYS)" <MIMMIN> Subject: RE: Epstein catch up Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 20:37:02 +0000 I'm looking at the MCC release, by the way. Will circulate shortly. Ori inal Messa e From: (USANYS) <MIMMIE> Sent: Sunda , November 17, 2019 3:22 PM To: (USANYS) alMIE> Subject: FW: Epstein catch up I am surprised to hear, without prior consultation, that they have asked to come in. 't: IMIM> Ori inal Messa e From: Sent: Sunda , November 17, 2019 1:00 PM To: (USANYS Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Re: Epstein catch up Sure, happy to catch up — we tried to stop by a couple times on Friday but missed you, so can set a time for this week. Unfortunately we have conflicts tomorrow from 5:30 on — we could potentially do Wednesday but will be in White Plains so would have to call in, or if there are available times on Tuesday we could try for that. Just as backdrop, the meeting in California did not add any significant information except that we almost certainly couldn't bring an enticement charge (based on timing / location facts), and she's still not sure whether she wants to pursue a criminal case so we'll circle back with her attorneys later this month. She also didn't want to talk about specific conduct at this meeting so we don't have any additional info there. Meanwhile we're continuing to work on the pile of memos, and I don't think there's any additional update other than that is coming in for a limited proffer (just talking about her background, to start) a week from Tuesday. > On Nov 16, 2019, at 21:18, (USANYS) aMIE> wrote: > Can we find a time in the near future to catch up on a few things, including hearing more about your interview last week? Unfortunately both and I have to be out portions of Monday/Tuesday. Would Monday at 530 work for you guys? If not, can we aim for Wednesday morning. Thanks > Sent from my iPhone EFTA00106011

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.