Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00108895DOJ Data Set 9Other

11/16/2010

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00108895
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

11/16/2010 date of birth social secur ty number, Delray Beach, Florida, 33444, , was in erviewed at the Palm Beach County Resident Agency (PBCRA). After being advised of the id • the interviewing agents and the purpose of the interview, provided the following information; attended Wellington High School during her freshman an sop omore years of high school and was home schooled r junior and senior years. During her high school years, wi h h r family in her parents' home, located at Loxahatchee, Florida. home p one nu •er uring a sme period was . The phone number, belonged to her friend, AMBROSE was a friend of who was approximately one year older than h r friend Last Name Unknown (LNU) introduced and AMBROSE to TONY LNU. TONY LNU was described as approximately 18-19 years old at the time met him, approximately 5'11"-6' tall, tan with black hair which was longer on top and no tattoos or piercings. CHAZ LNU lived in Royal Palm Beach near a farm store, and

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
11/16/2010 date of birth social secur ty number, Delray Beach, Florida, 33444, , was in erviewed at the Palm Beach County Resident Agency (PBCRA). After being advised of the id the interviewing agents and the purpose of the interview, provided the following information; attended Wellington High School during her freshman an sop omore years of high school and was home schooled r junior and senior years. During her high school years, wi h h r family in her parents' home, located at Loxahatchee, Florida. home p one nu •er uring a sme period was . The phone number, belonged to her friend, AMBROSE was a friend of who was approximately one year older than h r friend Last Name Unknown (LNU) introduced and AMBROSE to TONY LNU. TONY LNU was described as approximately 18-19 years old at the time met him, approximately 5'11"-6' tall, tan with black hair which was longer on top and no tattoos or piercings. CHAZ LNU lived in Royal Palm Beach near a farm store, and and AMBROSE met TONY LNU at CHAZ LNU's home. TONY LNU approached and advised he knew a way she could make money by giving a massage to an older man. TONY LNU gave a phone number to call to set up the massage. At some later time, called the number and set up the massage appointment. AMBROSE drove to a residence located on Palm Beach. The first floor of the home was a living area and kitchen. AMBROSE remained downstairs while went to the upstairs of the residence. Approximately 3-4 girls were also present at the home when and AMBROSE were there. could not provide a physical description of the girls. The upstairs was brown or black in color and furnishings, and the area was a bedroom and bathroom. A massage table was set up in the room, and towels were laid out. An unidentified older man appeared in the room, wearing a towel. could not recall the name of the man. was shown a photograph of JEFFREY EPSTEIN. identified EPSTEIN as the man who appeared in the room wearing a towel. ESPTEIN laid on the massage table on his stomach, and began the massage. and EPSTEIN engaged in conversation, and when the discussion turned to age, did not correct EPSTEIN when it was mentioned that she was 18 years old. After approximately twenty minutes, EPSTEIN rolled onto his back for a chest massage. stated, "it got weird," when EPSTEIN began masturbating under the towel. backed away when EPSTEIN attempted to touch her, and she replied she had a boyfriend. At that point, the massage ended, and EPSTEIN paid $200.00, two one hundred dollar bills that he retrieved from his wallet. believed EPSTEIN was mad or angry at how the massage ended. reported that she did not have contact with EPSTEIN after that occasion. EFTA00108895

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.