From: Sigrid McCawley
Summary
From: Sigrid McCawley Subject: RE: Any News Date: 11 December 2018 at 14:33:18 GMT To: Cc: Stan Pottinger < Brad Edwards Hi - just a quick update - David has been in touch with Jeffrey and is working actively on trying to finalize a deal. David is in an all-day hearing today but I will try to check in with him this evening to see if he has received anything in writing back from Jeffrey's lawyer. I will be in touch. I hope you are doing well. Sigrid Sigrid McCawley Partner BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33301 (t) (m) From: [mailto: Sent: Friday, December 07, 2018 11:21 AM To: Sigrid McCawley Cc: Stan Pottinger; Brad Edwards Subject: Any News Hi Sigrid, I hope your well. How did this week go? Any news? Kindest Regards EFTA00143494 The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of att
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74
Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - Claims of Threats of Harm Via Emails
From To Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - Claims of Threats of Harm Via Emails Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 21:47:52 +0000 Importance: Normal Copy. Thank you. From: Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 5:42:12 PM To: Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - Claims of Threats of Harm Via Emails Should go to c26 since it's their AOR From: Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 5:39:47 PM To: Subject: Fw: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - Claims of Threats of Harm Via Emails Flea Reaching out to see if C9 would be willing to run with this (interview complainant in Katonah, NY) or if C26 takes all Guardians in their AOR. Let me know when you have a moment to chat. Sent: e es ay, cto er , • • . . To: Subjec : • : - aims o rests o arm Via Emails FYI...call to discuss? From: [email protected] Sent: Tuesda October 8 2024 2:58 PM To: Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - Claims of Threats of Harm Via Emails Special Agent I am a Threat Intake Examiner (TIE) at the FBI National Threat Operations Center (NTOC) U
From: "El=,
From: "El=, (OPR)" To: '9 Cc: 'I r > Subject: RE: OPR Matter (following up on our recent conversation) Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 12:44:55 +0000 We will certainly do so, in all respects. Thank you. And best wishes to you all for safety and health. Regards, From: Sent: Monday, April 06, 2020 11:00 PM To: (OPR) Cc: Subject: RE: OPR Matter (following up on our recent conversation) We're glad that information is helpful, and we appreciate you checking in with us on this —thank you. We do not believe that asking victims about their past contacts with the USAO-SDFL and FBI-MIA in or about 2005-2008 would present any issues for our office, we would just respectfully ask that any such discussions avoid addressing the substance of the underlying criminal scheme (including the victims' personal experiences and interactions with Epstein or his associates). And if those topics unavoidably arise despite not having been raised by OPR, we'd ask that you please let us know so we
UNCLASSIFIED//F0U0
UNCLASSIFIED//F0U0 Victim Services Division Epstein Investigation (NY-3027571) New York Victim Meeting - October 23, 2019 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278 Attendees Staff Support VSD New York ) ASAC (NY) IL Al ) ) SSA (NY) 1. Illi SA (NY) ) TF0 (NY) IN III ) TF0 (NY) L _II ) PAS (NY) VS (NY) It _M NM VS (NY) VS (NY) Guest Victim Specialists VS (BA) a VS (SE) USANYS VS (NK) Mil SDNY a VS (PH) SDNY VS (WF) Preparation Agenda UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO 1 of 2 EFTA00104890 UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO Victim Services Division Epstein Investigation (NY-3027571) New York Victim Meeting - October 23, 2019 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278 28 People total - Representing 15 Victims 14 Victims o 5 Support guests o 9 Attorney Bradley Edwards Esa. & Brittany Henderson, Esq. Representin Sigrid McCawley Esq & David Boies Esq. litoies Schiller Flexner LLP Representing: Total Attending Victims & Support: 28 Gloria Allred, Esq., Daniel Mullkoft, E
Deposition Transcript: 11-cv-007438
This document is a deposition transcript that lists the appearances of attorneys representing the plaintiff and defendant in a court case, along with other individuals present. The plaintiff is represented by multiple law firms and attorneys, while the defendant is represented by a single law firm with two attorneys. The document also notes the presence of a videographer.
Ozige11222c&v1D9g64JitiR PriallhitettitIPP21 1:41FicbCgog7g3 FPACielloCf72
Ozige11222c&v1D9g64JitiR PriallhitettitIPP21 1:41FicbCgog7g3 FPACielloCf72 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED ) STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) ) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ) ) Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff. ) ) ) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) ) JAMES EDWARD STALEY ) ) Third-Party Defendant. ) ) Case Number: 1:22-cv-10904-JSR ORDER REGARDING REVIEW OF VIDEOMATERIALS Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c) and the authority of this Court to administer its proceedings, and finding good cause established in the stipulated motion filed by Jane Doe I and the Government of the United States Virgin Islands, the Court orders that: 1. The Epstein Estate shall review the Epstein Media to determine its responsiveness to the subpoenas that have been issued by Jane Doe I and other parties to the related litigations. 2. If, during the cour
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.