Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00144588DOJ Data Set 9Other

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00144588
Pages
7
Persons
11
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE 1, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, et. al, Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Defendants. Case No.: 1:22-CV-10018 (JSR) & Consolidated Case No.: 1:22-CV-10019 (JSR) CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT DECLARATION OF OBJECTOR/CLASS MEMBER declare as follows: I. My name is and I am a victim and survivor of not only Jeffrey Epstein's crimes but the criminal activities of countless others, many of whom have not been brought to justice and many of whom may never be brought to justice or held accountable for their rape, trafficking, and criminal activity against me and countless young girls and young women. 2. The defendant in this case, JP Morgan Chase Bank, is just one of the numerous enablers of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise. For me, a high-ranking JP Morgan Chase Bank employee, Adam Castellani, Vice President of Media Relati

Persons Referenced (11)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE 1, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, et. al, Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Defendants. Case No.: 1:22-CV-10018 (JSR) & Consolidated Case No.: 1:22-CV-10019 (JSR) CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT DECLARATION OF OBJECTOR/CLASS MEMBER declare as follows: I. My name is and I am a victim and survivor of not only Jeffrey Epstein's crimes but the criminal activities of countless others, many of whom have not been brought to justice and many of whom may never be brought to justice or held accountable for their rape, trafficking, and criminal activity against me and countless young girls and young women. 2. The defendant in this case, JP Morgan Chase Bank, is just one of the numerous enablers of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise. For me, a high-ranking JP Morgan Chase Bank employee, Adam Castellani, Vice President of Media Relations, was sent in January 2007 as my personal "minder." I was coerced and groomed into what I thought was a "typical" romantic relationship for eighteen months, during which Adam watched me while watching out for his employer, JP Morgan Chase Bank. 1 EFTA00144588 3. Adam repeatedly advised me not to go to the police or reveal any information I had about Epstein and his illegal activities. He moved into my home in London, and Adam gaslit me into believing this was in my best interest. 4. Adam also thought on approximately two occasions when I was virtually a millimetre away from reporting my rape and trafficking to the authorities that a lovely dose of therapy, he organised, would be what I needed to move on and forget everything that ever happened, like magic. Both occasions were when he was an employee at JP Morgan and had transferred to Citi Bank in London to pursue our "relationship" and undying "love" for one another. 5. Perhaps if I had listened to my instincts and heart and questioned Adam's motives for me not reporting my rape and trafficking by Epstein and company, there would never have been a plea bargain in 2008. My conscious will always be ashamed and guilty for knowing I could have prevented more children and women from being raped and trafficked. 6. Little did I know or realise until 15 years later that the man who repeatedly raped me and countless others, Epstein, was Adam's employer's most significant client during this time, a fact which was conclusively known to Adam as JPMorgan's Vice President of Media Relations. I now realize that Adam's sudden appearance in my life was more than a random coincidence. 7. It is as if JP Morgan sex trafficked me again through its top media executive, Adam Castellani, whose first obligation was protecting his employer from me and the truth I knew and had shared with Castellani. He enabled Epstein and company to continue trafficking until Epstein's arrest in 2019 with his silence and complicity. 8. Since I came forward in 2016, I have done many media appearances up till now to achieve just a slither of justice for myself and others, which no doubt Adam will have seen working 2 EFTA00144589 in public relations. To my knowledge, Adam still has not come forward with information regarding his past employer's best client, Epstein. Why is Adam protecting his past employer and Epstein? 9. JPMorgan is well aware that I was eager to testify about Adam Castellani and his role in Epstein trafficking me at the previously upcoming trial on 23 October. My email of 22 September revealed all of this, and then suddenly, although not surprisingly, everything got settled. Again. 10. The public record must reflect this previously unknown and unrealised nefarious "relationship" between me, Adam Castellani, and JP Morgan Chase Bank. There is much more about all of this than the public ever knew, and only after 15 years is this linkage explicit. 11. In addition, discovery in these cases has uncovered one email from 2004, which was still residing on JPMorgan Chase Bank's servers or backups, which conclusively confirms that Adam Castellani, Vice President of Media Relations, was provided with a media briefing mentioning Epstein. 12. This is confirmation that one of JPMorgan's biggest clients, Jeffrey Epstein, was flagged in ongoing media clipping files years before Adam met me (was sent to me?) in January 2007. He knew all about Epstein--and I told him everything I knew about Epstein--and yet there were no consequences or repercussions for JP Morgan until now, over 15 years later. I'm also aware that JP Morgan cleaned all of Adam's correspondence off their servers, bar the 2004 email. 13. I am also objecting to the involvement of class counsel David Boies, who has maintained a cosy relationship with Bill Clinton, a well-known associate of Jeffrey Epstein (as well as Harvey Weinstein). I also believe it is a conflict of interest representing a class where another survivor, NM, and I are involved. 3 EFTA00144590 14. Last year, I wrote a grievance to the US Bar Association detailing the class attorneys' corruption, exploitation, and greed to no avail. 15. M, one of Boies's many clients, was trafficked with the aid of Bill Clinton, Boies's long-term close friend. 16. It concerns me that all these powerful men remain strangely connected. The New York Times reported in 2019, "soon after the sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein died in August, a mysterious man met with two prominent lawyers." Those two lawyers were "the famed litigator David Boies and his friend John Stanley Pottinger." 17. Pottinger is or was class counsel Brad Edwards's law partner (although he was recently quietly and mysteriously dropped from the Edwards-Pottinger website). No word on what happened to Mr. Pottinger, although the New York Times story provides some details: "Mr. Pottinger saw a chance to supercharge his law practice. For Mr. Boies, there was a shot at redemption after years of criticism for his work on behalf of Theranos and Harvey Weinstein." I guess Edwards saw a chance to "supercharge his law practice" with Pottinger, who has now mysteriously disappeared from both Boies, Edwards and I pray the victim's lives too. 18. Interestingly, all these influential attorneys have sought and continue to profit off Jeffrey Epstein's victims. According to the New York Times, "the man who called himself Kessler first contacted a Florida lawyer, Bradley J. Edwards, who was in the news for representing women with claims against Mr. Epstein." 19. I am asking the Court to investigate these extremely curious relationships between class counsel, Pottinger, and Kessler. Four years later, the New York Times article was never retracted or challenged. For the Court's convenience, I have provided a link to the subject New 4 EFTA00144591 York Times article: httos://www.nytimes.corn/2019/11/30/businessidavid-boies-pottinger-jeffrey- epstein-videos.html. 20. In addition, class counsel made a big deal about advertising in countries like Russia and Ukraine for more survivors to come forward. The Court should inquire about these efforts or lack thereof and how class counsel could have presented to anyone, let alone the Court, that survivors in two countries at war or could ever be compensated in this class action without political bias and prejudice. 21. This is especially true given the very short time between the settlement and the deadline to submit claims. Why would they want to advertise in countries for victims to come forward with all their evidence if there was never any intention of compensating victims equally or by international humanitarian law standards? One must wonder if Boies and company have political agendas, especially during war and upcoming elections on both sides of the ocean. 22. As a result of this unilateral involuntary class action, all known and unknown survivors have lost the right to contest or reject their settlement offer and still file legal claims against the banks that provided the financial machinery that enabled Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. 23. There are no good options, and I once again feel entrapped and silenced by a class action process more suited to defective products than mass rape and worldwide human trafficking. Although my lawyers have explained that this is not permitted, the Court should allow survivors to reject their settlement offer and proceed to litigate against JP Morgan. 24. I am also very concerned that none of the survivors will receive any settlement offers until after this Court's final hearing on 9 November. Why has everyone yet to notify the survivors about these critical deadlines? 5 EFTA00144592 25. It has also come to my attention that Simone Lelank, the administrator that the class attorneys and the defendants chose, also has multiple conflicts of interest; she recently served as an "independent" Claims Examiner to allocate funds to compensate the sex abuse victims of Harvey Weinstein. 26. Simone had previous employment with Weinstein, a close friend and former client of the class attorney, Boies, who personally went out of their way to silence sexual assault victims from coming forward and engaged in witness intimidation and media intimidation. 27. Simone must be removed and investigated immediately. All prior claims she administered should also be investigated. 28. I ask the Court to leave the entire case open until every last survivor is compensated with complete transparency and accountability to this Court and the public. Why should any of this be done in secret? 29. favourable Finally, I am also concerned by the involvement of class counsel with non-profit SOAR. Again, this would be another conflict of interest and bias towards other survivors. These firms, including Edwards-Pottinger, are prominently listed on SOAR's website. 30. SOAR should not be permitted to receive any award from any residual funds based on this conflict of interest. Once again, Mr. Pottinger remains ever-present yet invisible in the Epstein scandal, and this all needs to be thoroughly investigated by the Court, under oath if necessary, so these secrets can once and for all be exposed to everyone, especially the survivors who want the truth on why they were raped and trafficked. 31. Everyone must treat the Epstein victims with dignity, respect, compassion, and humility. All survivors of rape and trafficking deserve to be treated with dignity, humility, and 6 EFTA00144593 respect; this is non-negotiable, as rape is not dependent on race, class, gender, and faith. The Court and justice system must hold those accountable for the devastating impact our rape and trafficking had on all of us. 32. I remain angry and hurt for the burning hell that Epstein and others threw me and other innocents into the day we were all enslaved by and for Epstein. The unimaginable suffering Epstein and his many accomplices and enablers have caused me, my family, and my loved ones since 2006, never mind all the other rape victims and their families affected, is irreparable. 33. I am infertile and have no children. I am damaged and broken because I was raped hundreds of times by Epstein while his enablers stood by and watched. My mother witnessed me die three times. Over the last seven years, I have fought tooth and nail for justice and truth; however, we will never get justice. 34. Epstein and the enablers have stolen our bodies and, worse, one of life's most precious commodities: time. No compensation will ever make tip for the time stolen from our lives and futures. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 19, 2023, in an undisclosed location outside of the United States of America. 1U14 GIIT•2) Attorneys for Objector MARSH LAW FIRM PLLC James Marsh New York, NY 10001 7 EFTA00144594

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Epstein and Maxwell Rape and Sex Traffick Survivor -

Epstein and Maxwell Rape and Sex Traffick Survivor - Former Client of David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Stanley Pottinger and Brad Edwards. 06 September 2022 When I was seeking legal representation to advocate for my rights as a sex trafficked victim of Epstein, Maxwell and their co-conspirators, David Boies and his firm informed me that they would re me only if I provided a deposition in support of one of his other clients, for use in her civil case. I did not want to provide the deposition as I knew I would have to disclose very personal details that I did not feel ready to tell at that stage. However, I wanted to secure legal representation, so I agreed. Boies and his firm promised me that the deposition would remain sealed entirely and confidential. The deposition transcript, which I can produce, is clearly labelled "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL". I was asked to do the deposition on 17 February 2017. Still, according to my records, I did not sign a retainer with Boies Schiller u

37p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I. UNITED STATES JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the following facts are not in dispute and may be accepted as true: 1. Between about 2001 and 2006, defendant Jeffrey Epstein (a—billienaire—with—signifteant politieal-eenneetiens)-sexually-abusedinere-than-40 enticed into prostitution minor girls at his mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida, and elsewhere. Among the girls he sexually sed so enticed were Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. Because Epstein, through others, used a means of interstate commerce and knowingly traveled in interstate commerce to engage in this conduct, te-abuse-Jane-Dee-#4-en43ane-Dee-#2-(and-the-ether-vietims), he committed violations of federal law, specifically repeated violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2422. 2. In 2006, at the request of the Palm Beach Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Inves

132p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 40 EXHIBIT 16 EFTA00081180 Case 9:08-cv-807m091349pept Z91-15 _EriterM ocp WERocisstifolf/E15 Page 2 of roio-< uoc 16q0,3 e 0 EXHIBIT C Epstein vs. Edwards Undisputed Statement of Facts EFTA00081181 Case 9:08-cv-807ailaVs kigsyffigt 28415-c1p6Arger phri N 7NRocieatgfe)10/§815 Page 3 of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXKMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY I EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein's required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) ("The adverse party shall identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on wh

40p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE No. 1 and JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I represent Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 (as referred to as "the victims") in the above-listed action to enforce their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA). I also represented them (and several other victims) in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I am also familiar with the criminal justice system, having served as state prosecutor in the Broward County State Attorney's Office. 2. This affidavit covers factual issues regarding the Government's assertions of privilege to more tha

64p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE No. 1 and JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I represent Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 (as referred to as "the victims") in the above-listed action to enforce their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA). I also represented them (and several other victims) in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I am also familiar with the criminal justice system, having served as state prosecutor in the Broward County State Attorney's Office. 2. This affidavit covers factual issues regarding the Government's assertions of privilege to more tha

64p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.