Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00146702DOJ Data Set 9Other

Simone Lelchuk, Claims Administrator

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00146702
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Simone Lelchuk, Claims Administrator Epstein Survivors' Settlement Fund JPM do Freika PLL January 16, 2024 VIA EMAIL ( II) do Marsh Law Firm Re: Jane Doe 1 v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Case No. 22-cv-10019 (JSR) Dear Ms. Thank you for trusting me to evaluate your claims as part of the Epstein Survivors' Settlement Fund JPM (the "Epstein JPM Fund"). It has been an honor to be the Claims Administrator in this matter. Given the difficult nature of this process, please take care of yourself after reading this letter and seek support as needed. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning set forth and defined in the Stipulation of Settlement dated June 22, 2023 (the "JPM Stipulation") [ECF No. 181-1]. I have fully evaluated all Questionnaires and Releases submitted to me from Participating Claimants and this letter ("Determination Notice") constitutes notice of your Allocated Amount. After considering your Questionnaire and Release using the guidelin

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Simone Lelchuk, Claims Administrator Epstein Survivors' Settlement Fund JPM do Freika PLL January 16, 2024 VIA EMAIL ( II) do Marsh Law Firm Re: Jane Doe 1 v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Case No. 22-cv-10019 (JSR) Dear Ms. Thank you for trusting me to evaluate your claims as part of the Epstein Survivors' Settlement Fund JPM (the "Epstein JPM Fund"). It has been an honor to be the Claims Administrator in this matter. Given the difficult nature of this process, please take care of yourself after reading this letter and seek support as needed. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning set forth and defined in the Stipulation of Settlement dated June 22, 2023 (the "JPM Stipulation") [ECF No. 181-1]. I have fully evaluated all Questionnaires and Releases submitted to me from Participating Claimants and this letter ("Determination Notice") constitutes notice of your Allocated Amount. After considering your Questionnaire and Release using the guidelines and evaluation factors enumerated in Section 5.2 of the JPM Stipulation and the totality of the circumstances, I have determined your Allocated Amount is One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00). Massive, LLC has advised that there is no withholding required as a result of medical liens and your distribution will be made upon receipt of signed payment instructions. Please execute the attached form to indicate where your Allocated Amount should be wired. Per Section 5.4 of the JPM Stipulation, the Allocated Amount determined for each Participating Claimant is final and non-appealable. The payment that will be made from the Epstein JPM Fund to you is intended to be for damages for personal physical injuries, physical sickness, emotional distress from physical sickness, physical injuries. Accordingly, you will not be issued an IRS Form 1099 and recommend that you seek advice based on your particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor to confirm that the payment is excludable from taxable gross income under 26 U.S.C. § 104(a)(2) I , if applicable, under the laws of your home country. EFTA00146702 January 16, 2024 Page 2 of 2 If ou have an i uestions concerns about this Determination Notice you may contact me at counsel by phone at I email at The JPM Stipulation and referenced sections herein can be found at www.epsteinSSFJPM.com under the Case Documents tab. I also want to take this opportunity to let you know that the U.S. Virgin Islands ("GVI") has established a mental health fund (the "Mental Health Fund") to provide a financial resource for mental health services for survivors of Jeffrey Epstein that I will be administering. As a Class Member of both the Epstein DB Fund and the Epstein JPM Fund, you are eligible to apply for approved mental health treatment as recommended by a mental health provider. Information about the Mental Health Fund and instructions for submitting an application and treatment plan can be found at the dedicated website set up for this fund: www.USVIMentalHealthFund.com. The Mental Health Fund will launch on January 16, 2024. Respectfully, Simone Lelchuk EFTA00146703

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:08-CV-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS' MOTION TO JOIN UNDER RULE 21 AND MOTION TO AMEND UNDER RULE 15 This cause is before the Court on Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4's Corrected Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action ("Rule 21 Motion") (DE 280), and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Protective Motion Pursuant to Rule 15 to Amend Their Pleadings to Conform to Existing Evidence and to Add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as Petitioners ("Rule 15 Motion") (DE 311). Both motions are ripe for review. For the following reasons, the Court concludes that they should be denied. I. Background This is an action by two unnamed petitioners, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, seeking to prosecute a claim under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 377

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen

12p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.