Subject: RE: CNN -.MN
To: Subject: RE: CNN -.MN Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:30:25 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image00 Ljpg = and her younger sister= were interviewed by the FBI during the MM investigation. with her. From: Sent: Monday, July 29, 201910:31 AM To: Subject: RE: CNN -1= Let's see what comes back with first. re working with attorney to set up a time to meet On Jul 29, 2019 10:29 AM. wrote: I was planning to tell her because it's part of an ongoing investigation we can't discuss, but wasn't sure if she came back with 'how is this part of the current case' how I would answer. From Sent: Monday, July 29, 201910:26 AM To: Subject: Re: CNN -I= Does the team know this victim? Does she show up in Sentinel? The 2006.2007 reference may be because interviewed her as part of their investigation. New York Field Office Criminal - Branch C From: Sent: Friday, July 26, 201912A2:18 PM To Subject: FW: CNN -1= see below. Does this make any sense to you both? Thanks From
Summary
To: Subject: RE: CNN -.MN Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:30:25 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image00 Ljpg = and her younger sister= were interviewed by the FBI during the MM investigation. with her. From: Sent: Monday, July 29, 201910:31 AM To: Subject: RE: CNN -1= Let's see what comes back with first. re working with attorney to set up a time to meet On Jul 29, 2019 10:29 AM. wrote: I was planning to tell her because it's part of an ongoing investigation we can't discuss, but wasn't sure if she came back with 'how is this part of the current case' how I would answer. From Sent: Monday, July 29, 201910:26 AM To: Subject: Re: CNN -I= Does the team know this victim? Does she show up in Sentinel? The 2006.2007 reference may be because interviewed her as part of their investigation. New York Field Office Criminal - Branch C From: Sent: Friday, July 26, 201912A2:18 PM To Subject: FW: CNN -1= see below. Does this make any sense to you both? Thanks From
Persons Referenced (2)
“...ssaulted and her then-16-year-old sister molested by Epstein and his companion, Ghislaine Maxwell, in 1996. then 26, claims that she was employed by Epstein, a multimillionaire financier who lived in...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...in New York. We've seen reports that a who says she was sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein in 1996, reported her assault to the FBI in 1996. Can you please verify this d...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
referenceRelated Documents (6)
EFTA01905212
EFTA01838551
reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that
reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, [REDACTED - Survivor], Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science
GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]
GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...
EFTA01682184
Epstein Reputation Management Email Reveals Paid SEO/Hacking Campaign to Suppress Negative Coverage
The email provides concrete details about a paid operation to manipulate search results for Jeffrey Epstein, including payments, specific tactics, and references to high‑profile associates. It suggest Epstein hired a contractor (Mike) for $2,500 plus a pending $7,500 to run SEO and hacking services. The operation involved removing negative articles, altering Wikipedia, replacing mug‑shot images, a
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.