Subject: RE: ACTION REQUESTED: Due-outs from DD meeting

From: To: Subject: RE: ACTION REQUESTED: Due-outs from DD meeting Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:20:17 +0000 Importance: Normal No problem From: Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 11:20 AM To: Subject: RE: ACTION REQUESTED: Due-outs from DD meeting Sony, had to run to a meeting. Ok so those are the drives, is working on now. Perfect. Thank you. Supervisory Special Agent/Forensic Examiner Unit Chief Digital Forensics Analysis Unit Operational Technology Division Federal Bureau of Investigation - NYO voicemail - Cell - OTD Desk On Aug 20, 2019 11:18AM, wrote: I tried calling you back, those drives were in his safe during the first search warrant, we did not have the authority to seize them at the time. When we came back a week later they were missing. The individual that took them was contacted and brought them over right away. The drives are not encrypted to my knowledge, they are with being processed. We are going through the taint process due to the potential for privileged information. From: Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 10:53 AM To: Subject: Fwd: ACTION REQUESTED: Due-outs from DD meeting This is the question Pm tying to answer. Do you know what hard drives are being discussed and where they are? Supervisory Special AgenUForensic Examiner Unit Chief Digital Forensics Analysis Unit Operational Technology Division Federal Bureau of Investigation NYO voicemail Cell OTD Desk EFTA00147266 Forwarded messa le From: Date: Aug 20, 2019 9:33 AM Sub'ect: Fwd: ACTION RE UESTED: Due-outs from DD meetin To: Cc: From: Date: Aug 20, 2019 9:24 AM Subject: ACTION REQUESTED: Due-outs from DD meetin To: Forwarded messa: e All, Cc: This morning the DD was interested in a set of specific evidence related to the Epstein investigation. ADIC mentioned to the DD about evidence that was received from a 3rd parties residence (mid to late July). The residence owner turned it over uickly and stated that he didn't want to have anything to do with it after it was placed there by an associate. indicated that the drives recovered appeared to be encrypted. The evidence sheets provided to the EAD do indicate media that was received on 8/16, but no mention of encryption, or whether they were associated with this residence. Can we get some clarification? The DD, as well as ADIC and CID, are inquiring about the prioritization of the exploitation of that media, specifically since it may lead to co- conspirators which has the attention of the AG. EAD is requesting that OTD be on standby for additional questions as this appears to be a focus today. V/r, emor Technical Advisor- Digital Systems Science and Technology Branch Federal Bureau of Investigation Office: Cell: This communication is UNCLASSIFIED but may contain information that is Law Enforcement Sensitive and/or For Official Use Only. The contents of this communication are considered to be draft, deliberative, and pre- decisional in nature and are intended solely for the personal review of the captioned recipients. Please forgive typographical errors attributed to unintended technical or human causation. EFTA00147267