Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
S/CN=72708F8BC5354F44958B87907FFOBCDB
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments: Interview of
_
pdf
AUL"
Ok sorry for the delay.
For
there is only the attachment; no notes were taken for the 302 authored
Yes, the 302 regardin=
just the short notes along with the invoice.
There were no notes fora I apologize for the confusion in labeling that attached.
Ok I figured out thMconfusion. The
terview is attached
because he was present for the interview
lected in the 302.
sent. l-nay, may ]. , ZULU SU/ Pm
listed at the top
This is really helpful, and I think we're down to the last few. A couple follow-up questions / clarifications —
Fo
), I don't think we received notes from 7/6/19 — the attachments included a copy of
her ID but not any writing. It's possible there weren't other written notes — the 302, attached, is very short — but just let
us know either way?
Similarly, just want to confirm that the notes for
are just the short contact info notes, with his attorney info and a
property invoice — both the notes and the 302 are a ached for reference. I think that's right but just want to confirm.
I also didn't see notes foe
though let us know if it's in a longer write-up in one of the files or if we otherwise
missed it, that's also totally possible.
And lust a clarification, it looks like the other attached document is listed as'
which I assume is
It also has the nam
(?) at the top, which maybe where that confusion comes from — I
know you were looking into that. I think both those names just show up on that one doc.
Also totally happy to chat via phone if that's easiest to run through these. Thanks again!
EFTA00153838
Hi all,
I've attached the notes you've requested. I've also attaches
02 and notes; that interview was not in
the batch we gave you. You'll see below where I've typed "attached" to reflect w at notes we have. Interviews where
this is not written simply meant there were no notes to attach likely because the interview/contact was brief (I double
checked all to be sure). Let me know if there is anything else you come across that we've missed sending.
Also, could you send over the notes from the last two phone interviews with
we have them on our end.
Thanks,
From
,
:
Just want to make sure
Thanks very much again for getting us so many 302s recently, we really appreciate it. Collectively, there have been more
than 120 interviews in this case, which is incredible. We've now completed a full review and cross-reference of all our
materials, so wanted to address a handful of loose ends. In terms of reports, I think currently we're down to only missing
three, all of which we have interview notes for but no 302s:
And then there are a larger number of interviews where we have a 302 but not hand-written notes. My guess is that for
some of these, and possibly most, there aren't notes because the "interviews" were so short that they just got typed up,
but we wanted to check. Also most of them were interviews conducted by other agents (where it was agents other than
one or both of you, I've indicated below). But if you could please double check to see if there are interview notes for the
following, and in particular the few that are in bold? And let us know if any questions or issues. They are:
EFTA00153839
Thanks again!
EFTA00153840