Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00154363DOJ Data Set 9Other

Exhibit N

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00154363
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Exhibit N EFTA00154363 December C 2020 The Honorable Alison Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Ghblaine Marvell Your Honor, Ghislaine has been a friend of mine for over 25 years. I met her through my deceased husband who was an old friend of hers. They met I think, first in Hong Kong in the early 1990s. My husband died some three years ago leaving me - without any notice - both destitute and effectively homeless. I had nowhere I could stay apart from a room at my mother's house in the countryside in England where I had not lived for over 30 years. I am still involved in an ongoing and messy probate. Ghislaine, without judgment or prejudice, offered me a roof over my bead in her home in London free of charge or bill payments until I could get back on my feet so to speak. I had nothing to give her and she had nothing to gain from me living there. Given those circumstances I thi

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Exhibit N EFTA00154363 December C 2020 The Honorable Alison Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Ghblaine Marvell Your Honor, Ghislaine has been a friend of mine for over 25 years. I met her through my deceased husband who was an old friend of hers. They met I think, first in Hong Kong in the early 1990s. My husband died some three years ago leaving me - without any notice - both destitute and effectively homeless. I had nowhere I could stay apart from a room at my mother's house in the countryside in England where I had not lived for over 30 years. I am still involved in an ongoing and messy probate. Ghislaine, without judgment or prejudice, offered me a roof over my bead in her home in London free of charge or bill payments until I could get back on my feet so to speak. I had nothing to give her and she had nothing to gain from me living there. Given those circumstances I think it says a great deal about Ghislaine's moral character in particular her loyalty and kindness towards someone who could offer her nothing in return. When another friend subsequently offered to pay rent for me this was still at a substantially lower than market rate. I want to conclude by saying that never in my wildest dreams do I think Ghislaine could be guilty of the terrible charges against. Lace anyone charged with any crime, she is innocent unless proven guilty and has a right to due process and humane treatment and should be treated accordingly. Yours respectfully, EFTA00154364

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: 773

The transcript details a segment of Ghislaine Maxwell's jury trial where the jury requests supplies and a definition for 'enticement'. The prosecution and defense discuss how to respond, with the judge referencing previous cases (United States v. Almonte and United States v. Dupigny) to define 'entice' as 'to attract, induce, or lure using hope or desire'.

58p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court of Appeals Mandate and Judgment: 22-1426

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her arguments on appeal regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations, jury impartiality, and sentencing. The court found no errors in the district court's conduct of the case. The mandate was issued on December 2, 2024.

9p
OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: SDNY PRESS GUIDANCE I U.S. v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, FRIDAY,

From: [=. To: ' Cc: ' Subject: RE: SDNY PRESS GUIDANCE I U.S. v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2021 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:54:50 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.png Just checking back on this. Thx! From Sent: Friday, November 26, 2021 10:34 AM To: I= '; Cc: Subject: RE: SDNY PRESS GUIDANCE I U.S. v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2021 Awesome, thanks. Are we able to provide a time if I also include the following? 9:30 a.m. — Jury charge followed by opening statements in U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell — the defendant is charged in connection to conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to entice minors to travel to engage in criminal sexual activity — before Judge Alison Nathan (Courtroom 318, 40 Foley Square [overflow Courtrooms 110, 506, 905, and 906 of the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse]). From: Sent: Friday. November 26.2021 10:26 AM To: Cc: Subject: RE: SDNY PRESS GUIDANCE I U.S. v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2021 I don't think so. From

3p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 188

The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, notifying her of a superseding indictment in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The superseding indictment adds new charges and alleges a conspiracy that continued until 2004, rather than 1997. The government has already produced relevant discovery materials and is providing additional guidance to the defense to aid in trial preparation.

5p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Letter to the Judge: 618

The letter is from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan, proposing limited redactions to an Opinion and Order filed under temporary seal in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. The letter responds to a court order and includes an attachment under temporary seal. It was copied to counsel of record.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 472

The letter is a request from Patrick J. Smith, attorney for Jordana H. Feldman, to Judge Alison J. Nathan to add Feldman to the ECF docket in the case United States v. Maxwell. Feldman intends to move to quash a subpoena directed to her. The request was approved by the judge.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.