Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00155090DOJ Data Set 9Other

CID) (FBI)'

To: CID) (FBI)' Subject: : as ang - uestions for the Director Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:31:55 +0000 Importance: Normal FBI Miami's case officially became pending inactive due to the deal that then US Attorney Alex Acosta made with Epstein and his lawyers. FBI Miami was still investigating the case and were not in agreement with the non-prosecution agreement Epstein was given. FBI Miami Agents did follow-up on information received in 2011 when a victim who originally was not spoken with came forward. FBI Miami took the case to a different district in Florida and the USAO declined to move forward with a prosecution. In 2016, civil attorneys for victims approached SDNY AUSAs regarding a civil suit they were pursuing claiming violations of the CVRA and presenting information that Epstein should be the subject of a criminal investigation, wanting SONY to investigate further. Nothing came from this meeting and no investigation was opened at that time. Hope this answers your

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00155090
Pages
6
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

To: CID) (FBI)' Subject: : as ang - uestions for the Director Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:31:55 +0000 Importance: Normal FBI Miami's case officially became pending inactive due to the deal that then US Attorney Alex Acosta made with Epstein and his lawyers. FBI Miami was still investigating the case and were not in agreement with the non-prosecution agreement Epstein was given. FBI Miami Agents did follow-up on information received in 2011 when a victim who originally was not spoken with came forward. FBI Miami took the case to a different district in Florida and the USAO declined to move forward with a prosecution. In 2016, civil attorneys for victims approached SDNY AUSAs regarding a civil suit they were pursuing claiming violations of the CVRA and presenting information that Epstein should be the subject of a criminal investigation, wanting SONY to investigate further. Nothing came from this meeting and no investigation was opened at that time. Hope this answers your

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: CID) (FBI)' Subject: : as ang - uestions for the Director Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:31:55 +0000 Importance: Normal FBI Miami's case officially became pending inactive due to the deal that then US Attorney Alex Acosta made with Epstein and his lawyers. FBI Miami was still investigating the case and were not in agreement with the non-prosecution agreement Epstein was given. FBI Miami Agents did follow-up on information received in 2011 when a victim who originally was not spoken with came forward. FBI Miami took the case to a different district in Florida and the USAO declined to move forward with a prosecution. In 2016, civil attorneys for victims approached SDNY AUSAs regarding a civil suit they were pursuing claiming violations of the CVRA and presenting information that Epstein should be the subject of a criminal investigation, wanting SONY to investigate further. Nothing came from this meeting and no investigation was opened at that time. Hope this answers your questions. Let me know if you have any follow-up questions with the above. Happy to chat as well if need be. Special Agent FBI New York Fie O ice Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking Desl From (CID) (FBI) Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2024 7:55 AM To: (NY) (FBI) Subject: Re: OCA Tasking - Questions for the Director Another follow up. . If you don't know the answer, I can ask Miami: OCA has received the EM approved Epstein summary, but they had a follow-up question: What happened in the Miami case? Did it close after two years, and why? And nothing between - 2007 - 2018? Respectfully, Unit Chief Crimes Against Children & Human Trafficking Unit Criminal Investigative Division Desk: Mobile EFTA00155090 Fromili (NY) (FBI) Sent: e nes ay, u y 10, 2024 4:00:2/ PM To: CID) (FBI) Subject: RE: OCA Tasking - Questions or a fret or Hey See attached. Let me know if you have questions. From: CID) (FBI)MPI Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 6:14 PM To: NY) (FBI) Subject: Re: OCA Tasking - Questions for the Director Hey I got help up. You still want to chat? Respectfully, Unit Chief Crimes Against Children & Human Trafficking Unit Criminal Investigative Division Desk: Mobile From (NY) (FBI) Sen • 024 2:03:24 PM To: (CID) (FBI) Cc: (NY) (FBI) < SuFAct: Re: OCA Tasking - Questions for the Director Yea absolutely. No rush. Thanks! Special Agent FBI New York Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking From (CID) (FBI) Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 2:02:29 PM To: NY) (FBI Cc: NY) (FBI) Subject: RE: OCA Tasking - Questions for the Director Would it be okay if I catch you a bit later (around 5pm)? We have a panel discussion coming up at the PCOR conference so I won't be able to step away until after. EFTA00155091 Respectfully, Unit Chief Crimes Against Children & Human Trafficking Unit Crimin InvectinativP Division Desk: Mobile From: (NY) (FBI) > Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 1:56 PM To: CID) (FBI) Cc: (NY) (FBI) Subject: RE: 0CA Tasking Questions or t e Director I know we have some write ups from having to do regular reports so let me see what I already have and see what else we need to pull together to give the full overview. I'll work on getting this to you as soon as possible. If you have a minute to chat, I have a couple questions. Special Agent FBI New York Field Office Child Ex loitation Human Trafficking Desk: From: (CID) (FBI Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 1:46 PM To: IV) (FBI) < Cc: NY) (FBI) - Subject: FW: 0CA Tasking - Questions for the Director I know I told you I hoped I wouldn't have to bother you again, MM. Please see the below tasker. Would you be able to get a timeline to me by Thursday morning? Bullet points for the timeline / summary would be great and I can put it in whatever format they want. If you have something already written up, feel free to send it my way and I can always pull out what we need. Thank you! Respectfully, Unit Chief Crimes Against Children & Human Trafficking Unit Criminal Investi alive Division Desk: Mobil From: CID) (FBI) Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 1:23 PM EFTA00155092 To (CID) (FBI) (CID) (FBI Cc: (CID) (FBI) (CID) (FBI) Subject: FW: OCA Tasking - Questions for the Director Good afternoon, Regarding the Epstein flight logs request, we have a follow up: The Director's Office asking if they could get a timeline of the whole investigation as well as a summary of what we investigated (and when). They said it would be just for the Director's Office as background. It will not be for public dissemination. Please provide a timeline as well as the summary by COB Thursday, July 11, 2024. Thank you, I'rutram.\ualssl Criminal Investigative Division Violent Crimes Against Children Section — Front Office Desk From: (CID) (FBI) Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 1:19 PM To: (CID) (FBI- Cc: CID) (FBI) (CID) (FBI) FIQ-DIV06-VCACS-FRONT-OFFICE Subject: RE: OCA Tasking - Questions for the Director Good afternoon VCACS, CID) (FBI (CID) (FBI) (CID) (FBI) Thank you for the information below regarding the Epstein flight logs. The Director's Office asking if they could get a timeline of the whole investigation as well as a summary of what we investigated (and when). They said it would be just for the Director's Office as background. It will not be for public dissemination. Please provide a timeline as well as the summary by COB Thursday, July 11, 2024. Thank you, Management & Program Analyst Criminal Investigative Division Federal Bureau of Investigation Desk: From: (CID) (FBI) Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 5:07 PM To: CID) (FBI) EFTA00155093 Cc: CID FBI (CID) (FBI) (CID) (FBI) (CD) (FBI) (CID) (FBI) (CID) (FBI) Subject: RE: OCA Tasking - Questions for the Director Hi, Please see the following response approved by A/SC "The FBI conducted a full and thorough investigation into the allegations that Epstein and others produced, possessed and/or distributed CSAM. This investigation included a review of the flight logs as well as dozens of pieces of evidence. The flight logs were used as exhibits during the trial and therefore are public record (with the exception of the names of minor victims which were redacted). Should OCA require any other background information, please let us know. There is no additional information which we feel is appropriate to comment on in a public hearing, though." Thank you, Program Analyst Criminal Investigative Division Violent Crimes Against Children Section — Front Office Desk: (- From: HQ_DIV06_OCA Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 11:10 AM To: HQ-DIVO6-VCACS-FRONT-OFFIC Cc: (CID) (FBI) CID) (FBI) (FBI) Subject: OCA Tasking - Questions for the Director CID) (FBI) Good afternoon VCACS, HQ_DIV06_OCA CID) This is a tasking from OCA - The director has an upcoming engagement with a member of congress where they believe the member will ask about the Epstein Flight Logs. They want to make sure the Director has a solid response when this question comes up and have asked us to send the latest information on an answer to the below questions. If your section could answer the questions below, please let me know. If your section believes that we shouldn't be providing any specifics or confirming any information, please let me know as well. o What specifically has the FBI done to investigate the claims that Epstein's and others participated in produced, possessed, and distributed to CSAM? o Is there any information that can be provided on requests for Epstein's flight logs? This is a time sensitive request, so please provide a response by COB Today if possible. *For some reference on recent Epstein conversations w/ Congress - during Director Wray's Senate Appropriations (June 4tH) hearing the question regarding Epstein came up. The interaction can be found attached in the PDF and below: EFTA00155094 JOHN KENNEDY: OK. Here's my second question. We know that Jeffrey Epstein, who is now deceased and Ms. Maxwell, his associate who is in prison were engaged in a conspiracy of sex trafficking with minors. So were others. It's been widely reported. What's the FBI doing to investigate the other people that were involved in these sex trafficking rings? CHRISTOPHER WRAY: Well, I'm not sure that I can, um, confirm any specific individual being investigated. JOHN KENNEDY: Well, let me put it this way. Let me give you some facts. Widely reported. Jeffrey Epstein had video surveillance in all of his homes and on his private island. And there has been -- there -- there have been articles after articles from witnesses who have said he videotaped sex acts with prominent people because he was trying to cur -- with young girls that he had procured to try to incur favor with those prominent people and potentially for what? To be able to blackmail them. Now that's a fact. And -- and the FBI and other federal agencies have raided his houses. Do you have those tapes? CHRISTOPHER WRAY: Again, I can't discuss the specifics of our law enforcement operations related to Mr. Epstein or Ms. Maxwell, but obviously, we had very active investigation related to both of them. But whether it extends to other people, I'm not sure that's something that I can comment on. Management & Program Analyst Criminal Investigative Division Federal Bureau of Investigation Desk: EFTA00155095

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreference

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN RE:

IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Non-Prosecution Agreement IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein with one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure expressed in this Agreement; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation of Epstein's background and offenses including; knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to commit an offense against the United States, in violation of Titl

6p
House OversightUnknown

Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein allegedly leaked confidential Epstein prosecution details to NYT reporter

Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein allegedly leaked confidential Epstein prosecution details to NYT reporter The passage suggests possible prosecutorial misconduct and unauthorized media leaks in the Jeffrey Epstein case, providing names, dates, and alleged actions that could be followed up. However, similar allegations have been reported before, limiting novelty and impact. Key insights: Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein discussed confidential prosecution strategy with NYT reporter Landon Thomas.; Weinstein allegedly disclosed specifics about alleged phone luring and interstate travel for underage sex.; Weinstein reportedly warned the reporter not to trust Epstein's defense attorneys and framed the conversation as hypothetical.

1p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

Document references alleged Epstein non‑prosecution deal, FBI evidence, and pressure on U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Acosta during his 2017 labor‑secreta...

The passage links high‑level officials (Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Acosta, FBI, and the Trump administration) to a possible non‑prosecution agreement and alleged interference in a Mentions a non‑prosecution deal for Jeffrey Epstein referenced in an FLBI FOIA release. Claims FBI had sufficient evidence to prosecute but was allegedly overruled by political pressure. Alleges U.S.

3p
House OversightUnknown

Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict

Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict The passage provides concrete names (Jeffrey Sloman, Acosta, Lefkowitz, Starr) and dates (2008, 2013) showing possible obstruction of victim notifications in the Epstein case, suggesting a lead for investigating DOJ and FBI decision‑making. While it ties high‑level officials, the claim of pressure from Epstein’s attorneys is not yet corroborated, limiting the score to the high‑mid range. Key insights: Jeffrey Sloman, top aide to U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, planned to notify Epstein victims after a plea deal was signed.; Lefkowitz warned Acosta that the office had promised not to contact victims or potential claimants.; Federal prosecutors resumed the FBI investigation and interviewed witnesses in NY and NM while plea negotiations continued.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers to downplay federal charges and secure a lenient plea

The passage alleges that senior U.S. attorneys and a federal prosecutor (Andrew Acosta, Paul Villafafia) worked with Epstein’s legal team to limit federal prosecution, manipulate venue, and keep victi Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to strike references to a defendant’s prior sexual c U.S. Attorney Paul Villafafia negotiated with Epstein’s lawyers while an FBI investigation was act

1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014046

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.