Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00157378DOJ Data Set 9Other

IflisAws

From: To: Cc: IflisAws rpm ffall WIMMI DSAWS). • • /USANYSI Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] • RE: Epsten Evidence status Date: Friday, July 29, 2020 2:20:46 PM Attachments: ZeroByte Files.xlsx In addition to the pending questions below, we've been advised by the vendor that is reviewing the initial seven devices (that were provided on a per-device extraction basis, as previously discussed) that those materials include approximately 71,000 documents that are zero bytes (i.e., empty files). They are listed in the attached spreadsheet. Is that accurate? Or does that reflect some issue with the extraction process? thanks, From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 18:08 To: M. (NY) (FBI) a> Cc: (NY) (FBI) a>: I. (NY) (FBI) a M. (USANYS)< E>: (USANYS) • M. (USANYS) [Contractor] Subject: RE: Epstein Evidence status This is very helpful, thank you. Comparing this to the prior spreadsheet, and leaving aside the "Nothing for Southern" designations as well as the

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00157378
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: To: Cc: IflisAws rpm ffall WIMMI DSAWS). • • /USANYSI Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] • RE: Epsten Evidence status Date: Friday, July 29, 2020 2:20:46 PM Attachments: ZeroByte Files.xlsx In addition to the pending questions below, we've been advised by the vendor that is reviewing the initial seven devices (that were provided on a per-device extraction basis, as previously discussed) that those materials include approximately 71,000 documents that are zero bytes (i.e., empty files). They are listed in the attached spreadsheet. Is that accurate? Or does that reflect some issue with the extraction process? thanks, From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 18:08 To: M. (NY) (FBI) a> Cc: (NY) (FBI) a>: I. (NY) (FBI) a M. (USANYS)< E>: (USANYS) • M. (USANYS) [Contractor] Subject: RE: Epstein Evidence status This is very helpful, thank you. Comparing this to the prior spreadsheet, and leaving aside the "Nothing for Southern" designations as well as the

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Cc: IflisAws rpm ffall WIMMI DSAWS). /USANYSI Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] • RE: Epsten Evidence status Date: Friday, July 29, 2020 2:20:46 PM Attachments: ZeroByte Files.xlsx In addition to the pending questions below, we've been advised by the vendor that is reviewing the initial seven devices (that were provided on a per-device extraction basis, as previously discussed) that those materials include approximately 71,000 documents that are zero bytes (i.e., empty files). They are listed in the attached spreadsheet. Is that accurate? Or does that reflect some issue with the extraction process? thanks, From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 18:08 To: M. (NY) (FBI) a> Cc: (NY) (FBI) a>: I. (NY) (FBI) a M. (USANYS)< E>: (USANYS) • M. (USANYS) [Contractor] Subject: RE: Epstein Evidence status This is very helpful, thank you. Comparing this to the prior spreadsheet, and leaving aside the "Nothing for Southern" designations as well as the NYC numbers that look like they're for the desktops that held the actual drives we're looking at (such as NYCO24385, 387, 389, 391, and 393, and NYCO27909), I think there are just three additional devices listed here that weren't on the spreadsheet you previously sent. I have those as: NYCO24328 (row 10) NYCO24367 (row 62) NYCO27910 (row 96) Could you please confirm that I have those additions correct, and that I'm not missing any? And it looks like all of those were included in the drive you provided today. I also see there are some drives that are still being processed, including NYCO24376 through 380 and several drives in NYCO24395 — could you please let us know what that means? Thanks very much, and we'll circle back if any issues with anything we received today, which should 3503-056 Page I of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_0000220 1 EFTA00157378 get to in the next day or two. thanks again, Original Message---- From: M, (NY) (FBI) mr > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 14:44 To: a (USANYS) <I M=> Cc: M. (NY) (FBI) < >; ME, "c > Subject: Epstein Evidence status I. (NY) (FBI) Here is the up to date spreadsheet. I color coded things to hopefully make it easier. There are 5 items I have to get you (as we discussed this morning) Those should take another day or 2, so looking at Monday/Tuesday for that. Any questions, let me know. NYC CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner (office) (cell) 3503-056 Page 2 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002202 EFTA00157379

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.